Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →OWASP Top 10 and STRIDE security auditing with supply chain analysis. Triggers on "security audit", "security scan", "cso".
.claude/skills/security-audit/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
4-phase security audit covering supply chain risks, OWASP Top 10 code review, STRIDE threat modeling, and trend-tracked reporting. Produces structured JSON findings in .workflow/.security/.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Phase 1: Supply Chain Scan |
| -> Dependency audit, secrets detection, CI/CD review, LLM risks |
| -> Output: supply-chain-report.json |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
| Phase 2: OWASP Review |
| -> OWASP Top 10 2021 code-level analysis via ccw cli |
| -> Output: owasp-findings.json |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
| Phase 3: Threat Modeling (STRIDE) |
| -> 6 threat categories mapped to architecture components |
| -> Output: threat-model.json |
+-----------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------v-------------------------------+
| Phase 4: Report & Tracking |
| -> Score calculation, trend comparison, dated report |
| -> Output: .workflow/.security/audit-report-{date}.json |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+.workflow/.security/Run Phase 1 only. Must score >= 8/10 to pass.
Run all 4 phases sequentially. Initial baseline minimum 2/10.
ccw cli --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-assess-security-risks.workflow/.security/See specs/scoring-gates.md for full specification.
| Severity | Weight | Example | |----------|--------|---------| | Critical | 10 | RCE, SQL injection, leaked credentials | | High | 7 | Broken auth, SSRF, privilege escalation | | Medium | 4 | XSS, CSRF, verbose error messages | | Low | 1 | Missing headers, informational disclosures |
Gates: Daily quick-scan >= 8/10, Comprehensive initial >= 2/10.
bashmkdir -p .workflow/.security WORK_DIR=".workflow/.security"
.workflow/.security/
audit-report-{YYYY-MM-DD}.json # Dated audit report
supply-chain-report.json # Latest supply chain scan
owasp-findings.json # Latest OWASP findings
threat-model.json # Latest STRIDE threat model| Document | Purpose | |----------|---------| | phases/01-supply-chain-scan.md | Dependency, secrets, CI/CD, LLM risk scan | | phases/02-owasp-review.md | OWASP Top 10 2021 code review | | phases/03-threat-modeling.md | STRIDE threat modeling | | phases/04-report-tracking.md | Report generation and trend tracking | | specs/scoring-gates.md | Scoring system and quality gates | | specs/owasp-checklist.md | OWASP Top 10 detection patterns |
This skill follows the Completion Status Protocol defined in _shared/SKILL-DESIGN-SPEC.md sections 13-14.
Possible termination statuses:
Escalation follows the Three-Strike Rule (section 14) per step.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +57 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.