Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert at using SearchSDK for complex research tasks
.claude/skills/sediman-agent-search-orchestration/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -8% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -23% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 146% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
You are an expert at using the SearchSDK to orchestrate complex, multi-step search research tasks.
Use search_orchestrate for:
Use web_search for:
pythonsdk = SearchSDK()
Single query:
pythonhits = await sdk.retrieve.web("python async", provider="google", limit=10)
Parallel multi-query:
pythonqueries = ["python async", "golang routines", "rust async"] all_hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=3) # Returns: list of lists, one per query
Remove duplicates:
pythonunique = sdk.filter.dedupe(hits, key="url")
Filter by domain:
python# Only official sources official = sdk.filter.by_domain(hits, include=["google.com", "chromium.org"]) # Exclude low-quality sources clean = sdk.filter.by_domain(hits, exclude=["ads.com", "spam.com"])
Filter by regex:
python# Only CVEs cves = sdk.filter.by_regex(hits, field="snippet", pattern=r"CVE-\d{4}-\d+")
Filter by keywords:
python# Include security-related security = sdk.filter.by_keyword(hits, words=["security", "vulnerability"], mode="include") # Exclude ads clean = sdk.filter.by_keyword(hits, words=["sponsored", "ad"], mode="exclude")
Extract from multiple hits:
pythonresults = await sdk.extract.extract_many( hits, schema={"cve": str, "fix_version": str, "severity": str}, instruction="Extract CVE information" )
Extract from single hit:
pythonresult = await sdk.extract.extract_one( hit, schema={"title": str, "author": str, "date": str} )
Save state:
pythonsdk.state.save("cve_results", results)
Load state:
pythonprevious = sdk.state.load("cve_results")
List all states:
pythonstates = sdk.state.list()
python# Research CVEs across multiple years queries = [ f'site:chromereleases.googleblog.com "CVE-{{year}}"' for year in [2023, 2024, 2025] ] hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=4) filtered = sdk.filter.by_domain(hits, exclude=["mitre.org", "nvd.nist.gov"]) results = await sdk.extract.extract_many( filtered, schema={"cve": str, "fix_version": str, "severity": str, "summary": str} ) return results
python# Cross-reference pricing across vendors queries = ["product X price", "product X cost", "product X pricing"] hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=3) all_prices = await sdk.extract.extract_many( hits, schema={"vendor": str, "price": str, "currency": str}, instruction="Extract product pricing information" ) sdk.state.save("price_comparison", all_prices) return all_prices
python# Turn 1: Collect data queries = ["topic A", "topic B", "topic C"] hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=3) sdk.state.save("research_hits", hits) # Turn 2: Process saved data saved_hits = sdk.state.load("research_hits") results = await sdk.extract.extract_many( saved_hits, schema={"topic": str, "summary": str} ) return results
CVE Research:
pythonqueries = [f'site:chromereleases.googleblog.com "CVE-{{y}}"' for y in [2023, 2024, 2025]] hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=4) filtered = sdk.filter.by_domain(hits, exclude=["mitre.org", "nvd.nist.gov"]) results = await sdk.extract.extract_many( filtered, schema={"cve": str, "fix_version": str, "severity": str} ) return results
Competitor Analysis:
pythonvendors = ["competitor A", "competitor B", "competitor C"] queries = [f"{{v}} pricing features" for v in vendors] hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=3) results = await sdk.extract.extract_many( hits, schema={"vendor": str, "pricing_model": str, "starting_price": str} ) return results
Topic Survey:
pythonqueries = ["python async tutorial", "golang async guide", "rust async book"] hits = await sdk.retrieve.web_many(queries, concurrency=3) tutorials = sdk.filter.by_regex(hits, field="title", pattern="(tutorial|guide)") results = await sdk.extract.extract_many( tutorials[:5], # Limit to top 5 schema={"language": str, "topic": str, "url": str} ) return results
Remember: SearchSDK is for complex, multi-step research. For simple queries, just use web_search directly.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 18,688 | 9,111 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,748 | 3,449 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 20,626 | 12,921 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,644 | 3,562 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 13,466 | 7,408 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,651 | 3,066 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,299 | 3,836 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 946 | 2,084 | +120% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 4,625 | 4,938 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 713 | 2,363 | +231% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 4,880 | 1,614 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 741 | 1,824 | +146% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 3,456 | 4,750 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 497 | 1,826 | +267% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,714 | 2,430 | -75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,847 | 2,122 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 11,383 | 4,690 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,403 | 2,677 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 6,878 | 3,963 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,310 | 2,318 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 11,606 | 4,233 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,390 | 2,459 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 6,731 | 3,126 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,229 | 2,158 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 5,133 | 1,811 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 966 | 1,857 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 4,189 | 1,776 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 658 | 1,896 | +188% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 8,919 | 3,774 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,716 | 2,103 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 9,956 | 5,873 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,927 | 2,676 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 5,882 | 4,303 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 958 | 2,402 | +151% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 3,068 | 2,159 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 449 | 1,954 | +335% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,576 | 7,127 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,127 | 2,840 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 13,750 | 7,859 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,395 | 2,976 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,509 | 5,013 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,821 | 2,505 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 10,197 | 7,123 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,931 | 3,043 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +59 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.