Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Migrates React projects and components from Radix UI to Base UI. Use when asked to migrate from radix, move to base-ui, convert radix primitives, or switch a shadcn project's base library. Handles single components ("migrate accordion") and whole projects.
.claude/skills/shadcn-migrate-radix-to-base/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 77% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 42% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 38% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 85% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 39% | 0% |
You migrate shadcn wrappers, hand-rolled radix compositions, and their consumers to @base-ui/react, keeping the project buildable at every step. Be precise; never guess a mapping. When a prop or part is not in these reference files, check node_modules/@base-ui/react/**/*.d.ts before transforming, and record gaps in the report.
npx shadcn@latest info --json (or the project's runner): gives thecurrent base, STYLE (e.g. radix-lyra), tailwind version, aliases, installed components, and package manager. Trust it over inference.
pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lock, yarn.lock, package-lock.json) and use IT for every install. Never leave a stale lockfile.
typecheck/build so pre-existing failures are never attributed to you.
@base-ui/react alongside radix. Radix packages are removed onlyafter the LAST component is migrated (both coexist fine).
known style (radix-<style>), the shadcn CLI itself is the golden-pair executor:
origin, using the components.json style VERBATIM in the URL (https://ui.shadcn.com/r/styles/<style>/<component>.json, files0].content). This works for prefixed styles (radix-nova) AND legacy unprefixed ones (new-york, new-york-v4, default), which are all still served.
components.json style radix-<style> ->base-<style> now. PROGRESSIVE mode: do NOT flip yet (the project is still mostly radix; the flip happens once, after the last component); fetch base variants directly by URL instead (https://ui.shadcn.com/r/styles/base-<style>/<component>.json).
--overwrite delivers the base variant with the project's exact icon/font/preset resolution. Never bulk --all --overwrite; go component by component, or you drown in unrelated registry version drift. PROGRESSIVE mode: never use --overwrite (it destroys the original that consumers still import); write the fetched base variant content to <component>-base.tsx instead.
onto it (their customizations must SURVIVE; --overwrite would destroy them). Mechanical implementation that works at scale: git merge-file user.tsx radix-golden.tsx base-golden.tsx (three-way merge, radix golden as ancestor) auto-resolves most files; hand-resolve conflicts with the reference tables.
merged "clean": grep -n "radix-ui\|@radix-ui\|IconPlaceholder" per file. The registry sometimes reorders functions between variants, which makes three-way merges report zero conflicts while leaving stale radix hunks in place. A clean merge is NOT proof of a clean file. This is more reliable than reconstructing transforms; use it whenever the pair exists. Consumer/app code has no CLI mechanism: always hand-migrate it against consumer-props.md.
replay. These have no base counterpart (there is no base-new-york), and retargeting onto a base-<style> variant would restyle the user's app. Use the radix golden ONLY to detect customizations, then run the transformation engine on the user's OWN file: rewire primitives, keep their exact classes, apply class-mapping renames. Their look stays theirs. At the end of a legacy whole-project migration, FLAG (do not fix): the style name still reads as radix to the CLI, so future shadcn add will deliver radix variants; the user decides whether to switch style or add manually.
projects, unknown styles: transform using universal-patterns.md (imports in BOTH forms: radix-ui and @radix-ui/react-*; asChild->render with the worked example; Portal>Positioner>Popup; the positioner FORWARD rule; part renames), the per-family props tables (overlays.md, menus.md, form-controls.md, disclosure.md, display-misc.md), class-mapping.md for data-attribute/CSS-var rewrites, and wrapper-shapes.md for exact target shapes (tooltip arrow, SubContent defaults, select anatomy).
Progressive (default). "Migrate accordion" = one component, strangler-fig:
<component>-base.tsx,consumers split between old/new imports. The files ARE the state; resume, never restart.
button), STOP and recommend migrating those first, bottom-up.
<component>-base.tsx (original untouched;golden-pair content fetched by URL, or transformed by hand, per the strategy above); typecheck. Repoint consumers ONE AT A TIME (imports + the call-site props in consumer-props.md); typecheck each. When no consumer imports the original: delete it, rename -base -> original, flip imports back, final check, commit. When the LAST radix wrapper in the project is finalized, flip components.json to base-<style> and remove radix deps.
Whole project (only when explicitly asked): same per-component work in dependency order (leaf/shared wrappers like button and label first). After wrappers, sweep ALL app code against consumer-props.md — the call-site break surface is much larger than asChild. Then remove radix deps, install, full build.
(drawer), sonner, input-otp, react-day-picker (calendar), recharts (chart). Report them as intentionally untouched.
native <label>; VisuallyHidden -> sr-only; Direction -> Direction Provider (direction prop, not dir). Popover Anchor and NavigationMenu Indicator have no equivalent: inert passthrough + flag.
button.tsx migrates to the REAL @base-ui/react/button primitive, nevera hand-rolled useRender wrapper.
activation, menu items not closing on click, nav-menu 50ms delay). The target is idiomatic Base UI matching the shadcn base registry.
migrated. Pre-existing failures are named as pre-existing.
Typecheck per file, build per batch, full build at the end vs the baseline.
Reports live in a .migration/ directory at the project root, ONE FILE PER COMPONENT: .migration/<component>.md (e.g. .migration/accordion.md). Rules:
migrated. Re-running a component replaces its report; never touch other components' files.
file per component, each self-contained; shared consumer-sweep notes are repeated in every affected file.
.migration/project.md (dependency swap, app-code sweep summary, final build result).
maintained: scan the project's ui directory (the ui alias from shadcn info, e.g. components/ui or src/components/ui) for remaining radix imports when asked "what's left". End every run's summary with that derived count ("N wrappers remain on Radix").
Each .migration/<component>.md uses EXACTLY this structure (it is documented publicly; reports must match it):
md# <component> <date, strategy used (golden pair via CLI / merge / engine), one-line verdict> ## Changed <every file touched, with what changed and why; include file:line for anything notable. Confirm the leftover scan is clean: grep -n "radix-ui\|@radix-ui" on this component's files> ## Left alone <files that look related but were intentionally not touched, with the reason (cmdk/vaul/sonner are not radix; unrelated drift; etc.)> ## Behavior changes <differences that compile fine but act differently; flagged, never patched (tabs activation, menu close-on-click, delays...). Empty section if none> ## Verify by hand <short manual QA checklist for this primitive family: focus return on dialogs, keyboard nav + typeahead on menus/select, tooltip delay feel, slider commit events. Concrete steps, one minute of clicking>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 35,375 | 3,969 | -89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,565 | 2,548 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 3,821 | 6,195 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 364 | 2,764 | +659% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 4,560 | 3,740 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 296 | 2,575 | +770% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 8,552 | 4,644 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,856 | 3,293 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 10,637 | 4,694 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,245 | 3,180 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 11,515 | 3,385 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,137 | 2,952 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 13,737 | 7,917 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,736 | 4,120 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,535 | 8,367 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,979 | 3,658 | +85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 9,815 | 2,124 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,898 | 2,645 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 9,580 | 4,953 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,870 | 3,417 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,306 | 3,492 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,634 | 2,936 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 13,318 | 9,116 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,841 | 4,455 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 8,136 | 5,168 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,550 | 3,351 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 8,047 | 6,592 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,647 | 3,697 | +124% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 5,825 | 3,160 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,158 | 2,965 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 6,792 | 2,839 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,316 | 2,786 | +112% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 7,034 | 4,277 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,438 | 2,971 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 10,879 | 3,052 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,128 | 2,959 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 10,453 | 6,188 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,020 | 3,115 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 7,203 | 5,396 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,687 | 3,522 | +109% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 14,135 | 15,604 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,072 | 5,862 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 13,009 | 8,326 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,107 | 4,327 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.