Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →shanraisshan/vibe-to-agentic-framework
The conceptual framework behind the presentation — what "Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering" means, why the journey is structured the way it is, and how every slide fits the narrative arc
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 22 without it.
and 39 more in the full report
17 fixed4 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 17 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What is the maximum journey level assigned to the alternative video presentation script file 1-video-workflow.html?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response states that 1-video-workflow.html caps at Medium level. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This skill teaches the conceptual model behind the presentation. Every slide and section exists to tell a single story: how a developer incrementally moves from unstructured "vibe coding" (Low level) to high-level agentic engineering (High level).
Vibe Coding (Low level) is when a developer uses Claude Code with no structure — no project context, no conventions, no reusable knowledge. Every prompt is a coin flip. Claude might create random endpoints, ignore existing patterns, skip tests, and produce inconsistent code. The codebase drifts toward entropy with every interaction.
Agentic Engineering (High level) is when Claude Code operates as a fully configured engineering system. It knows the project architecture (CLAUDE.md), follows scoped conventions (Rules), loads domain expertise on demand (Skills), delegates to specialized workers (Agents), orchestrates multi-step workflows (Commands), automates lifecycle events (Hooks), and connects to external tools (MCP Servers). Every prompt produces consistent, tested, production-quality code.
The journey between these two extremes is incremental and cumulative. Each best practice builds on the previous ones, and the presentation teaches them in the order a developer should adopt them.
The presentation uses a 4-level scoring system instead of a percentage bar:
| Level | Order | Color | Journey Bar Height | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 1 | Red/orange (hsl(0, 70%, 45%)) | 25% | Vibe coding territory — no structure |
| Medium | 2 | Yellow (hsl(40, 70%, 45%)) | 50% | Structured workflows, some automation |
| High | 3 | Light green (hsl(80, 70%, 45%)) | 75% | Domain knowledge, skills, custom agents |
| Pro | 4 | Deep green (hsl(120, 70%, 45%)) | 100% | Full agentic engineering, multi-agent teams |
The journey bar is hidden on slide 1 (title slide) and appears from slide 2 onward. Levels are set via data-level attributes on key transition slides and inherited by subsequent slides until the next level change. A .level-badge is JS-injected on the slide's h1 when the level changes (do not hardcode these in HTML).
Every technique is demonstrated on a realistic full-stack project. The presentation shows the transformation from a plain project (vibe coding) to one with full Claude Code configuration (agentic engineering):
Before (Vibe Coding):
todoapp/
├── backend/ # FastAPI (Python)
│ ├── main.py
│ ├── routes/
│ ├── models/
│ └── tests/
└── frontend/ # Next.js (TypeScript)
├── components/
├── pages/
test cases passed, vs 4 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.