Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.
.claude/skills/shinpr-testing-principles/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 50% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 4% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 9% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -32% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 12% | 0% |
Use this cycle for new or changed executable behavior and reproducible bug fixes. For a behavior-preserving refactor, first confirm existing tests pass or add passing characterization tests, then refactor and rerun the same regression evidence.
RED: confirm the new test fails for the intended reason. GREEN: implement the smallest passing change. REFACTOR: improve structure while the test remains green. VERIFY: run the repository's applicable regression checks.
Mock-based tests are sufficient when data access is only a dependency of the behavior under test. Verify against the project's real database engine or its accepted equivalent when the subject is a query, repository implementation, schema constraint, or migration compatibility. Resolve the test environment from repository configuration; when no representative environment exists and adding one is outside the approved work, report the missing verification decision.
Cross-check data-access code against the schema source named in the Design Doc or repository configuration. Schema-source verification is required to prove table, column, type, constraint, or dialect compatibility; successful mocks prove behavior only at the mocked boundary.
A capability probe passes when it uses the consumer's boundary and asserts the exact property that consumer needs. Command success, import success, or object existence is setup evidence.
Follow the repository's established test paths, runner routing, and naming. When establishing an approved new convention, separate test types only when their setup, runner, or environment differs.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.