Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.
.claude/skills/sickn33-agent-qa-debug-fix/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -50% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 29% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -32% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 77% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
Repair a failed Agent QA run from recorded evidence and the relevant local source. Treat the classifier as a hypothesis, make the smallest justified change, and verify the narrowest affected behavior without rewriting a test merely to conceal a real defect.
agent_qa_get_runagent_qa_get_run_stepsagent_qa_get_run_artifactagent_qa_get_run_logsagent_qa_get_run_execution_logsagent_qa_classify_failure and treat its category as a hypothesis, not a verdict.agent_qa_validate_test, agent_qa_validate_suite, and agent_qa_validate_definition before rerunning edited YAML..agent-qa artifacts and state that MCP evidence was unavailable.textUser: Fix the failed staging checkout run, but do not touch production. Expected handling: collect the failed run evidence, classify it, inspect the implicated local definition and application code, patch only the evidenced cause, validate, rerun the single staging test, and report changed files plus remaining uncertainty.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 14,414 | 13,182 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 149 | 974 | +554% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 24,034 | 21,372 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 292 | 951 | +226% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 19,168 | 19,886 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 197 | 930 | +372% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 21,847 | 10,490 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,285 | 1,657 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 34,788 | 28,682 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,213 | 5,669 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 10,951 | 13,093 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 866 | 2,019 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 18,077 | 14,053 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,017 | 2,111 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 11,331 | 7,504 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 877 | 1,139 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 13,441 | 8,451 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,286 | 1,329 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 11,564 | 8,230 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,022 | 1,322 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 20,584 | 10,918 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,341 | 1,631 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 19,621 | 9,831 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,220 | 1,506 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 13,476 | 9,313 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,291 | 1,410 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 11,176 | 11,279 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 995 | 1,758 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 16,075 | 11,183 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,655 | 1,753 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 15,743 | 8,217 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,726 | 1,297 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,952 | 11,998 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,608 | 1,964 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→fail | 10,666 | 9,762 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 845 | 1,468 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,410 | 7,372 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,049 | 1,198 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 14,775 | 10,668 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,488 | 1,733 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 16,339 | 10,338 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,769 | 1,575 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 17,022 | 10,092 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,931 | 1,582 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.