Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Run Fireworks-hosted open-weight model councils that compare responses and synthesize a final answer.
.claude/skills/sickn33-llm-council/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 189% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 208% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 251% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 292% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 235% | 0% |
Read the detailed guide before executing this skill. It retains the complete procedure and reference material. Treat its safety, prerequisites, and validation requirements as mandatory. For focused work, load the relevant sections; for end-to-end work, read the guide completely.
Use when this workflow matches the user request: Use this skill for its documented workflow.
_Source: dair-ai/dair-academy-plugins (MIT)._
This skill implements Karpathy's LLM Council concept where multiple open-weight LLMs deliberate on a query, powered entirely by Fireworks AI:
All inference runs through Fireworks AI using open-weight models. The speed and pricing of Fireworks makes it practical to run multi-model deliberation that would be slow or expensive on other providers.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | pass→pass | 21,403 | 19,314 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,114 | 9,643 | +134% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 14,702 | 16,976 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,781 | 9,265 | +233% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 10,367 | 7,987 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,163 | 7,496 | +247% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 6,442 | 5,845 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 968 | 6,392 | +560% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 6,697 | 6,229 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,093 | 6,304 | +477% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 8,665 | 7,117 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,564 | 6,448 | +312% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,877 | 7,410 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,540 | 7,336 | +189% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 11,248 | 2,143 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,044 | 6,305 | +208% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 9,834 | 4,065 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,921 | 6,749 | +251% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 9,140 | 1,527 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,577 | 6,174 | +292% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 10,516 | 1,678 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,861 | 6,228 | +235% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 5,698 | 1,772 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 933 | 6,202 | +565% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,076 | 1,508 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,846 | 6,187 | +235% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 14,143 | 5,189 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,351 | 6,839 | +191% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 12,671 | 4,943 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,992 | 6,766 | +240% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 27,511 | 2,343 | -91% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,100 | 6,381 | +480% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 1,644 | 3,482 | +112% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 226 | 6,543 | +2795% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 13,781 | 6,627 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,330 | 7,060 | +203% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 3,066 | 2,548 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 486 | 6,305 | +1197% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 6,114 | 1,761 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,033 | 6,201 | +500% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 4,918 | 2,372 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 770 | 6,364 | +726% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 8,007 | 1,503 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,298 | 6,155 | +374% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The publisher has shipped newer versions since this run, so these numbers describe v1, not the version currently listed.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.