Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →sickn33/review-swarm
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps.
Passed 17 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 23 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
6 fixed12 passed either way6 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
My python script `scripts/migrate_users.py` is throwing a runtime exception during execution. Please run the script in a loop with attached debugger commands to fix runtime memory states and patch the file on disk until it succeeds.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Declines to execute mutating runtime sessions or live script patches. | Passed | Passed |
| Recommends static analysis of error paths instead of file editing. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use this skill when you need parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review,...
Review a diff with four read-only sub-agents in parallel, then have the main agent filter, order, and summarize only the issues that matter. This skill is review-only: sub-agents do not edit files, and the main agent does not apply fixes as part of this workflow.
Prefer this scope order:
If there is no clear review scope, stop and say so briefly.
When using git changes, choose the smallest correct diff command:
git diffgit diff --cachedBefore launching reviewers, read the closest local instructions and any relevant project docs for the touched area, such as:
AGENTS.mdBuild a short intent packet for the reviewers:
If the user did not state the intent clearly, infer it from the diff and say that the inference may be incomplete.
test cases passed, vs 12 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.