Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 169% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 34% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 33% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 20% | 0% |
Use when this workflow matches the user request: Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
_Source: mattpocock/skills (MIT)._
Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
CONTEXT.md and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading themThis is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
git remote -v and .git/config — is this a GitHub repo? Which one?AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md at the repo root — does either exist? Is there already an ## Agent skills section in either?CONTEXT.md and CONTEXT-MAP.md at the repo rootdocs/adr/ and any src/*/docs/adr/ directoriesdocs/agents/ — does this skill's prior output already exist?.scratch/ — sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in useSummarise what's present and what's missing. Then walk the user through the three decisions one at a time — present a section, get the user's answer, then move to the next. Don't dump all three at once.
Assume the user does not know what these terms mean. Each section starts with a short explainer (what it is, why these skills need it, what changes if they pick differently). Then show the choices and the default.
Section A — Issue tracker.
> Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like to-issues, triage, to-prd, and qa read from and write to it — they need to know whether to call gh issue create, write a markdown file under .scratch/, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.
Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a git remote points at GitHub, propose that. If a git remote points at GitLab (gitlab.com or a self-hosted host), propose GitLab. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:
gh CLI)glab CLI).scratch/<feature>/ in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)If — and only if — the user picked GitHub or GitLab, ask one follow-up:
> Explainer: Open-source repos often receive feature requests as pull requests, not just issues — a PR is an issue with attached code. If you turn this on, /triage pulls external PRs into the same queue and runs them through the same labels and states as issues (collaborators' in-flight PRs are left alone). Leave it off if PRs aren't a request surface for you.
docs/agents/issue-tracker.md. For local-markdown and other trackers, skip this question — there are no PRs.Section B — Triage label vocabulary.
> Explainer: When the triage skill processes an incoming issue, it moves it through a state machine — needs evaluation, waiting on reporter, ready for an AFK agent to pick up, ready for a human, or won't fix. To do that, it needs to apply labels (or the equivalent in your issue tracker) that match strings you've actually configured. If your repo already uses different label names (e.g. bug:triage instead of needs-triage), map them here so the skill applies the right ones instead of creating duplicates.
The five canonical roles:
needs-triage — maintainer needs to evaluateneeds-info — waiting on reporterready-for-agent — fully specified, AFK-ready (an agent can pick it up with no human context)ready-for-human — needs human implementationwontfix — will not be actionedDefault: each role's string equals its name. Ask the user if they want to override any. If their issue tracker has no existing labels, the defaults are fine.
Section C — Domain docs.
> Explainer: Some skills (improve-codebase-architecture, diagnosing-bugs, tdd) read a CONTEXT.md file to learn the project's domain language, and docs/adr/ for past architectural decisions. They need to know whether the repo has one global context or multiple (e.g. a monorepo with separate frontend/backend contexts) so they look in the right place.
Confirm the layout:
CONTEXT.md + docs/adr/ at the repo root. Most repos are this.CONTEXT-MAP.md at the root pointing to per-context CONTEXT.md files (typically a monorepo).Show the user a draft of:
## Agent skills block to add to whichever of CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)docs/agents/issue-tracker.md, docs/agents/triage-labels.md, docs/agents/domain.mdLet them edit before writing.
Pick the file to edit:
CLAUDE.md exists, edit it.AGENTS.md exists, edit it.Never create AGENTS.md when CLAUDE.md already exists (or vice versa) — always edit the one that's already there.
If an ## Agent skills block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.
The block:
markdown## Agent skills ### Issue tracker [one-line summary of where issues are tracked, plus whether external PRs are a triage surface]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`. ### Triage labels [one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`. ### Domain docs [one-line summary of layout — "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
Then write the three docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:
For "other" issue trackers, write docs/agents/issue-tracker.md from scratch using the user's description.
Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit docs/agents/*.md directly later — re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.