Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →sickn33/to-issues
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
8 fixed12 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
After all vertical slice tickets for epic #200 have been successfully published to Linear, what action should be taken on parent epic #200?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response states that parent epic #200 should remain open and unmodified. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use when this workflow matches the user request: Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
Source: mattpocock/skills (MIT).
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues. Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
test cases passed, vs 12 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.