Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Ultra-dense token optimizer skill for prompt caching, log pruning, AST-based inspection, and minified JSON payloads.
.claude/skills/sickn33-zipai-optimizer/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 25% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 81% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 43% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -29% | 0% |
| case-23 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -22% | 0% |
Use this skill when the request needs context-window-aware triage, prompt caching optimizations, concise technical output, ambiguity handling, or selective reading of logs, source files, JSON/YAML payloads, VCS output, or MCP tool results.
[ISSUE], [SUGGESTION], [NITPICK].grep -nE "^(class|def|async def|function|const|let|var).*=" (or language equivalents) to view class and function headers first, then target specific ranges with view_file.str_replace or single-hunk diffs). Never reprint unchanged surrounding code or perform full-file reprints.key: val), short bullet lists, and compact tables. Avoid paragraphs of text.file.py#L12-18).User request:
> Use @zipai-optimizer for this task: Ultra-dense token optimizer skill for prompt caching, log pruning, AST-based inspection, and minified JSON payloads.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-14 | pass→pass | 8,935 | 2,376 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,404 | 1,438 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 3,537 | 18,878 | +434% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 577 | 1,647 | +185% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 8,479 | 18,026 | +113% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,136 | 2,692 | +137% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 10,385 | 7,636 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,880 | 2,355 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 2,412 | 2,658 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 354 | 1,510 | +327% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 14,049 | 4,643 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,278 | 1,763 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 10,712 | 2,076 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,629 | 1,473 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 17,498 | 4,714 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,634 | 1,815 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 14,257 | 2,621 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,139 | 1,593 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 17,104 | 5,296 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,465 | 1,902 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→fail | 4,718 | 2,256 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 763 | 1,493 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 10,751 | 2,909 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,825 | 1,646 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 5,465 | 3,760 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 962 | 1,738 | +81% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 14,135 | 2,813 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,139 | 1,556 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 6,676 | 2,125 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 988 | 1,414 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,881 | 3,140 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,681 | 1,678 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→fail | 2,227 | 2,514 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 389 | 1,544 | +297% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 12,903 | 2,659 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,147 | 1,523 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 23,204 | 13,625 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,652 | 3,158 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 8,991 | 7,573 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,524 | 2,315 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 21,721 | 10,047 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,250 | 2,554 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 10,947 | 3,072 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,900 | 1,583 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 11,379 | 2,768 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,975 | 1,536 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 4 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The publisher has shipped newer versions since this run, so these numbers describe v1, not the version currently listed.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.