Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Turn a CSV of operational data (sales, usage, signups, support tickets) into a multi-page styled PDF executive report with narrative + matplotlib charts. The LLM analyzes the data, picks what's interesting, writes the prose, and emits a structured render request that becomes a polished PDF. Use when given a CSV and asked for a report, summary, or analysis.
.claude/skills/skrun-dev-csv-to-executive-report/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -23% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -1% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -3% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -9% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -26% | 0% |
You are a data analyst writing a report for a CEO who has 4 minutes to read it. Given a CSV, you produce a multi-page PDF with a clean narrative, well-chosen charts, and a summary table — the kind of artifact that gets forwarded with "great work, please make this a monthly thing."
analyze_csv with the user's csv_path. The tool returns: { columns, dtypes, row_count, numeric_stats (per numeric col: min/max/mean/sum), sample_rows (first 10) }
[label, value] pairs that capture the most useful single-glance facts. Examples: [["Total revenue", "$42,300"], ["MoM growth", "+23%"], ["Top segment", "Enterprise (47%)"], ["Records", "1,247 rows"], ["Period", "Q2 2026"]]
render_pdf — pass report_title, period, narrative_sections (array of { heading, body }), charts (array as defined in the tool schema), summary_table (array of [label, value]).report_path: from the tool responsepage_count: from the tool responsesummary: copy the headline narrative section's body (single paragraph)$XX,XXX. If counts, write commas-separated.page_count: 1.analyze_csv tool returns { error: "..." }. In that case, do not call render_pdf — return outputs with page_count: 0 and summary: "Could not parse CSV: <error message>".| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 6,613 | 3,927 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 404 | 1,277 | +216% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 8,615 | 9,459 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,327 | 2,658 | +100% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 5,329 | 3,367 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 272 | 1,192 | +338% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 30,652 | 3,430 | -89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 577 | 1,278 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 10,564 | 6,436 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,058 | 1,550 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 27,977 | 5,022 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,195 | 1,309 | -79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→fail | 8,858 | 6,082 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,418 | 1,381 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 13,277 | 3,951 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,454 | 1,197 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 7,561 | 2,502 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,237 | 1,455 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 7,485 | 7,529 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,339 | 1,858 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→fail | 10,374 | 3,477 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,820 | 1,655 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 6,051 | 2,007 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 989 | 1,367 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 10,103 | 3,780 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,626 | 1,200 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 9,466 | 4,984 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,538 | 1,271 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 2,141 | 6,356 | +197% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 373 | 1,633 | +338% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,788 | 2,582 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,773 | 1,472 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 5,949 | 12,904 | +117% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 253 | 1,589 | +528% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 12,944 | 4,284 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,251 | 1,733 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 13,459 | 6,794 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,196 | 2,180 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 10,165 | 3,665 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,748 | 1,619 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 4,853 | 18,266 | +276% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 765 | 2,873 | +276% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 5,632 | 10,182 | +81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,184 | 2,876 | +143% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 11 counted toward the lift figure. The other 11 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -5 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 11 comparable cases. 4 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.