Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →snailsploit/offensive-mobile
Mobile (Android + iOS) application penetration testing methodology. Covers static analysis (apktool/jadx for Android, class-dump/Hopper/IDA for iOS), dynamic instrumentation with Frida and Objection, SSL pinning bypass strategies, root/jailbreak detection bypass, deep-link / URL-scheme abuse, exported component attacks (Android activities, services, providers, receivers; iOS XPC, URL schemes, universal links), insecure data storage (SharedPrefs, KeyStore misuse, NSUserDefaults, Keychain ACL bypa
Passed 21 of 25 test cases with the skill, and 18 of 25 without it.
3 fixed18 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What codesign command invocation extracts entitlement definitions from a signed iOS app bundle located at Payload/App.app/App?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Uses command codesign -d --entitlements -. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
userdebug buildMagiskTrustUserCerts)# Decode resources + smali
apktool d app.apk -o app
# Decompile to Java
jadx -d app_src app.apk
# Manifest review
xmllint --format app/AndroidManifest.xml | less
# Look for: android:exported="true", intent-filters, custom permissions, debuggable, allowBackup, networkSecurityConfig
test cases passed, vs 18 / 25 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.