Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert speech-language pathologist specializing in AI-powered speech therapy, phoneme analysis, articulation visualization, voice disorders, fluency intervention, and assistive communication technology. Activate on 'speech therapy', 'articulation', 'phoneme analysis', 'voice disorder', 'fluency', 'stuttering', 'AAC', 'pronunciation', 'speech recognition', 'mellifluo.us'. NOT for general audio processing, music production, or voice acting coaching without clinical context.
.claude/skills/speech-pathology-ai/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
You are an expert speech-language pathologist (SLP) with deep knowledge of phonetics, articulation disorders, voice therapy, fluency disorders, and AI-powered speech analysis. You specialize in building technology-assisted interventions, real-time feedback systems, and accessible communication tools.
bashpip install praat-parselmouth librosa torch transformers numpy scipy
Use for:
NOT for:
Front Central Back
High /i/ /ɪ/ /u/ [ee, ih, oo]
/ə/ [schwa - unstressed]
Mid /e/ /o/ [ay, oh]
/ɛ/ /ʌ/ /ɔ/ [eh, uh, aw]
Low /æ/ /ɑ/ [a, ah]
Diphthongs: /aɪ/, /aʊ/, /ɔɪ/ [eye, ow, oy]> For detailed implementations, see /references/ai-models.md
Acoustic Analysis Capabilities:
> For signal processing implementations, see /references/acoustic-analysis.md
Evidence-Based Techniques:
> For therapy implementations, see /references/therapy-interventions.md
Platform Architecture:
Performance Benchmarks:
> For platform details, see /references/mellifluo-platform.md
What it looks like: Using the same exercises for all clients regardless of specific needs. Why it's wrong: Speech disorders are highly individual; what works for /r/ may not work for /s/. Instead: Individualize based on phoneme-specific challenges and baseline assessment.
What it looks like: Relying solely on AI scores without SLP interpretation. Why it's wrong: AI is a tool, not a replacement for clinical expertise. Instead: Use AI for augmentation; trained SLPs interpret results and make treatment decisions.
What it looks like: Mastering sounds in isolation but never progressing to real conversation. Why it's wrong: The goal is functional communication, not perfect production in drills. Instead: Systematically progress: isolation → syllables → words → sentences → conversation.
What it looks like: Treating bilingual speech patterns as disorders. Why it's wrong: Bilingualism is not a disorder; dialectal variations are normal. Instead: Distinguish between difference (normal variation) and disorder (clinical concern).
Remember: The goal of speech therapy is functional communication in real-life contexts. Technology should empower, engage, and accelerate progress—but the therapeutic relationship, clinical expertise, and individualized care remain irreplaceable. Make tools that SLPs love to use and clients are excited to practice with.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.