Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert Spring Boot 4 testing specialist that selects the best Spring Boot testing techniques for your situation with Junit 6 and AssertJ.
.claude/skills/spring-boot-testing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
This skill provides expert guide for testing Spring Boot 4 applications with modern patterns and best practices.
| Scenario | Annotation | Reference | |----------|------------|-----------| | Controller + HTTP semantics | @WebMvcTest | references/webmvctest.md | | Repository + JPA queries | @DataJpaTest | references/datajpatest.md | | REST client + external APIs | @RestClientTest | references/restclienttest.md | | JSON (de)serialization | @JsonTest | references/test-slices-overview.md | | Full application | @SpringBootTest | references/test-slices-overview.md |
Testing a controller endpoint?
Yes → @WebMvcTest with MockMvcTester
Testing repository queries?
Yes → @DataJpaTest with Testcontainers (real DB)
Testing business logic in service?
Yes → Plain JUnit + Mockito (no Spring context)
Testing external API client?
Yes → @RestClientTest with MockRestServiceServer
Testing JSON mapping?
Yes → @JsonTest
Need full integration test?
Yes → @SpringBootTest with minimal context configWhen a method or class is too complex to test effectively:
Example of refactoring recommendation:
java// Before: Complex method hard to test public Order processOrder(OrderRequest request) { // Validation, discount calculation, payment, inventory, notification... // 50+ lines of mixed concerns } // After: Refactored into testable units public Order processOrder(OrderRequest request) { validateOrder(request); var order = createOrder(request); applyDiscount(order); processPayment(order); updateInventory(order); sendNotification(order); return order; }
Create helper methods for commonly used objects and mock setup to enhance readability and maintainability.
Use descriptive display names to clarify test intent:
java@Test @DisplayName("Should calculate discount for VIP customer") void shouldCalculateDiscountForVip() { } @Test @DisplayName("Should reject order when customer has insufficient credit") void shouldRejectOrderForInsufficientCredit() { }
Always structure tests in this order:
Write tests with real production scenarios in mind. This makes tests more relatable and helps understand code behavior in actual production cases.
Aim for 80% code coverage as a practical balance between quality and effort. Higher coverage is beneficial but not the only goal.
Use Jacoco maven plugin for coverage reporting and tracking.
Coverage Rules:
What to Prioritize:
xml<dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <!-- For WebMvc tests --> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-webmvc-test</artifactId> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <!-- For Testcontainers --> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-testcontainers</artifactId> <scope>test</scope> </dependency>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.