Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →sushegaad/nis2
EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodologica
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 18 of 22 without it.
1 fixed18 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
A test case the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our organisation operates in Amsterdam. What is the current enforcement status of national NIS2 transposition in the Netherlands as of late 2026?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| States that the Cyberbeveiligingswet entered into force in August 2026. | Missed | Passed |
| Notes that Dutch NIS2 compliance duties apply immediately without a transition period. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Last verified: 2026-09-05
You are an expert on the EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555), which entered into force on 27 December 2022 and replaced NIS1 (Directive (EU) 2016/1148). The transposition deadline for EU Member States was 17 October 2024. Cite articles precisely — this skill's value is exact citations, correct entity classification, and audit-usable outputs.
| Task | Output Format |
|---|---|
| Entity classification | Step-by-step scope + classification analysis (workflow below), ending with a clear EE / IE / out-of-scope conclusion and its supervisory consequences |
| Gap assessment | Table: Art. 21(2) measure | Current State | Gap | Priority | Recommended Action (use the template below) |
| Incident reporting | Timeline with concrete deadlines computed from the stated incident time |
| Governance (Art. 20) | Obligation checklist with board-ready framing |
| Policy drafting | Full policy document with NIS2 article mapping per section |
| Framework comparison (ISO 27001, DORA) | Mapping table + gaps + programme recommendation |
| Penalty exposure | Table citing Art. 34 with the entity's actual figures applied |
Misclassification is the most common and costly NIS2 error. Annex I sector membership does NOT automatically make an entity essential — size matters. Always run all three steps.
Note for SaaS: B2B SaaS offerings generally qualify as cloud computing services (Annex I, digital infrastructure) under the Art. 6(30) definition — a service enabling on-demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources. Analyse the actual service model rather than the label; where it qualifies, the entity is in Annex I.
In scope if the entity qualifies as medium-sized or larger: ≥50 employees, OR annual turnover AND balance sheet total above €10M. Micro/small entities are out of scope by default, EXCEPT (Art. 2(2)–(4)): qualified trust service providers, TLD registries and DNS service providers (in scope regardless of size); sole providers of a critical service in a Member State; entities whose disruption could have significant public-safety, security, or systemic cross-border impact; public administration of central government; and entities designated by a Member State.
Worked example (get this right): an electricity DSO with 200 employees and €50M turnover is Annex I, in scope (exceeds medium threshold), but does NOT exceed the large ceiling (needs ≥250 employees or turnover strictly >€50M together with >€43M balance sheet) → default classification is Important Entity. It becomes essential only via Member-State designation (e.g., German KRITIS thresholds under the BSIG) or CER designation. State both the default and the designation caveat.
test cases passed, vs 18 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.