Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →syncable-dev/memtrace-change-impact-analysis
Compute what a planned source-code change will break — blast radius, affected processes, cross-repo callers, temporal stability, and Cortex decision-memory constraints — and produce a risk-rated change plan.
Passed 8 of 13 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 13 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
8 fixed5 passed either way8 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am about to edit `UserProfileController.updateAvatar`. Which search tool identifies its exact scope path and file path?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Uses find_symbol to look up the exact scope path and file path | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Pre-change risk assessment workflow. Before modifying code, this workflow maps the full blast radius, identifies affected processes, checks recent change history for instability signals, checks Cortex decision memory for recorded decisions/bans/contracts, and produces a risk-rated change plan.
Use this workflow when the change spans multiple symbols or needs a risk-rated plan. For a quick raw upstream/downstream radius around one known symbol, call get_impact directly.
Find the target symbol(s):
find_symbol if the user named specific functions/classesfind_code if the user described behaviour ("the authentication middleware")Collect symbol names (name, scope_path, file_path) for all targets — graph tools use names, not internal IDs.
For each symbol, call get_symbol_context (repo_id, symbol, file_path):
Decision: If cross-repo API callers exist, this change requires coordination with other teams. Flag this immediately.
For each target, call get_impact (repo_id, target) with direction: "both", depth: 5:
Decision:
| Risk | Action |
|---|---|
| Low | Proceed with standard testing |
| Medium | Review all direct callers; test affected processes |
| High | Plan incremental migration; consider feature flags |
| Critical | Full migration strategy; backward-compatible changes required |
test cases passed, vs 4 / 13 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.