Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Access SETI (Space Exploration Telecommunications Infrastructure) APIs. This skill provides Java SDK examples.
.claude/skills/team-telnyx-telnyx-seti-java/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -36% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -30% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -33% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -11% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -13% | 0% |
<!-- Auto-generated from Telnyx OpenAPI specs. Do not edit. -->
text<!-- Maven --> <dependency> <groupId>com.telnyx.sdk</groupId> <artifactId>telnyx</artifactId> <version>6.36.0</version> </dependency> // Gradle implementation("com.telnyx.sdk:telnyx:6.36.0")
javaimport com.telnyx.sdk.client.TelnyxClient; import com.telnyx.sdk.client.okhttp.TelnyxOkHttpClient; TelnyxClient client = TelnyxOkHttpClient.fromEnv();
All examples below assume client is already initialized as shown above.
All API calls can fail with network errors, rate limits (429), validation errors (422), or authentication errors (401). Always handle errors in production code:
javaimport com.telnyx.sdk.errors.TelnyxServiceException; try { var result = client.messages().send(params); } catch (TelnyxServiceException e) { System.err.println("API error " + e.statusCode() + ": " + e.getMessage()); if (e.statusCode() == 422) { System.err.println("Validation error — check required fields and formats"); } else if (e.statusCode() == 429) { // Rate limited — wait and retry with exponential backoff Thread.sleep(1000); } }
Common error codes: 401 invalid API key, 403 insufficient permissions, 404 resource not found, 422 validation error (check field formats), 429 rate limited (retry with exponential backoff).
GET /10dlc/enum/{endpoint}
javaimport com.telnyx.sdk.models.messaging10dlc.Messaging10dlcGetEnumParams; import com.telnyx.sdk.models.messaging10dlc.Messaging10dlcGetEnumResponse; Messaging10dlcGetEnumResponse response = client.messaging10dlc().getEnum(Messaging10dlcGetEnumParams.Endpoint.MNO);
Returns the results of the various black box tests
GET /seti/black_box_test_results
javaimport com.telnyx.sdk.models.seti.SetiRetrieveBlackBoxTestResultsParams; import com.telnyx.sdk.models.seti.SetiRetrieveBlackBoxTestResultsResponse; SetiRetrieveBlackBoxTestResultsResponse response = client.seti().retrieveBlackBoxTestResults();
Returns: black_box_tests (arrayobject]), product (string), record_type (string)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 17,345 | 7,315 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,668 | 2,338 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 12,891 | 4,697 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,625 | 1,835 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 14,210 | 6,278 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,082 | 2,055 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 5,298 | 1,610 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,054 | 942 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 5,275 | 1,285 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,028 | 891 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 5,382 | 2,085 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,059 | 1,074 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 4,883 | 1,456 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 876 | 916 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 8,738 | 1,738 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,795 | 980 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 8,630 | 1,933 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,663 | 1,018 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 2,604 | 1,516 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 400 | 930 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 8,884 | 1,119 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,712 | 866 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 2,542 | 1,533 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 385 | 900 | +134% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 4,180 | 23,919 | +472% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 614 | 850 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 2,619 | 1,590 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 395 | 934 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 15,470 | 2,668 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,013 | 1,189 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 10,824 | 1,654 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,784 | 965 | -46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 8,552 | 2,452 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,483 | 1,167 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 11,628 | 1,995 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,071 | 1,030 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 9,348 | 1,979 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,600 | 1,019 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 10,504 | 1,797 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,949 | 983 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 7,656 | 5,826 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,516 | 1,812 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 6,969 | 3,148 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,321 | 1,252 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 9,683 | 7,493 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,799 | 2,176 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +57 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.