Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Reviews a contract's termination provisions against the standard termination taxonomy — grounds (for-convenience vs for-cause), cure periods, notice mechanics, survival, termination fees, and transition/wind-down assistance — marking each branch present or missing and flagging the gaps, rather than just summarizing what the clause says. Use when reviewing or redlining the termination section of a commercial agreement for completeness. Do NOT use for extracting clauses into a schema, drafting a new clause from scratch, or reviewing an unrelated clause (indemnity, auto-renewal, pricing).
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 277% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 270% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | 273% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | 281% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | 271% | 0% |
Review a contract's termination provisions for completeness against a fixed taxonomy, not just readability. A capable model can read a termination clause and summarize it, but by default it describes what is present and stays quiet about what is absent — so a clause that never mentions survival, cure, or wind-down reads as fine. This skill makes the review systematic: walk every branch of the taxonomy, mark each one present or missing, and flag the gaps explicitly.
Activate when the request supplies a termination clause or section and asks you to review, redline, or check it — "review this termination provision", "what's missing from this termination clause", "does this cover everything before we sign".
Do not activate to extract clauses into a schema (that is a data-extraction task), to draft a fresh clause from nothing, or to review a different clause type (indemnification, auto-renewal, limitation of liability, pricing).
Check the clause against all six. For each, state present (with the specific terms) or missing / not addressed, then collect the gaps.
A clause that provides only one is incomplete: flag the missing right (e.g. cause-only with no convenience exit, or convenience-only with no breach remedy).
Do not narrate the clause. Produce a branch-by-branch checklist: each of the six branches marked present (with the terms found) or missing, followed by a short, prioritized list of the gaps to flag. If every branch is addressed, say so plainly — "no missing termination provisions" — rather than padding.
A branch counts as addressed only if the clause actually governs it. Silence is not coverage: if the clause never mentions data return, transition assistance is missing even though nothing in the clause is wrong.
For the full per-branch sub-checklist (every item a reviewer drills into within a branch), see references/termination-checklist.md.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.