Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when reviewing CI configuration, bundle analysis workflows, or pull requests that add dependencies and assets. Distinguish bundle-size budgets from runtime budgets such as Lighthouse or Core Web Vitals so teams can enforce both.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -34% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -9% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 68% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 204% | 0% |
Without automated enforcement, performance degrades gradually — each PR adds a small library, each feature adds a few KB, and within months the app that loaded in 2 seconds now takes 5. Performance budgets make regressions visible at PR time rather than after user complaints. Catching 'this PR added 200KB to the bundle' in review is far cheaper than debugging a slow production site.
Does this project have performance budgets defined? Check package.json and CI configuration for size or Lighthouse thresholds.
Set up bundle size limits with size-limit and Lighthouse CI assertions in the CI pipeline.
Explain performance budgets, how to choose appropriate thresholds, and how to enforce them with size-limit and Lighthouse CI.
Inspect CI workflows, package.json, and Lighthouse or bundle-size config for explicit thresholds. Flag repos where budgets are missing, too loose to catch regressions, or unenforced on pull requests. Check whether production RUM and alerting are wired to detect regressions after release.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/en/rules/testing/performance-budget
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.