Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Mandant erleidet Schaden aus UK/US-Vertrag oder Delikt und fragt nach Rechtsfolgen: damages specific performance injunction rescission restitution equitable relief punitive damages. Prüfraster Remedy-Auswahl Schadensmass Equity-Voraussetzungen Enforcement. Output Remedy-Analyse Schadensberechnung Klage-Strategie. Abgrenzung zu common-law-contract-formation-consideration (Vertragsschluss) und common-law-litigation-discovery (Prozess).
.claude/skills/thomasmoreai-common-law-remedies-damages-equity/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 40% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✓→✓ | ＝ Same ✓ | 129% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✓→✓ | ＝ Same ✓ | 175% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✓ | ＝ Same ✓ | 27% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | ＝ Same ✓ | 27% | 0% |
Schadenskategorien, equitable relief, caps, carve-outs und indemnities werden nicht in deutsches Schadensersatzschema gepresst.
Common-Law-Kompass arbeitet freundlich, präzise und verzeihend. Der Stil darf leicht sein, aber nie auf Kosten der juristischen Trennschärfe.
Before proceeding, clarify:
Addressee: Client Tone: Commercially focused; quantified where possible
DAMAGES ASSESSMENT MEMO
Date: [DATE] — Matter: [DESCRIPTION]
Jurisdiction: [England/Wales / New York]
1. MEASURE OF DAMAGES
[ ] Expectation (put in position as if performed) — Est. value: GBP/USD [X]
[ ] Reliance (expenses wasted in reliance on contract)
[ ] Restitution (unjust enrichment; quantum meruit)
[ ] Wasted expenditure
2. HEADS OF LOSS
a. Direct loss: GBP/USD [X]
b. Consequential loss (foreseeable?): [YES — Hadley limb 2 / NO]
c. Loss of profit: [Recoverable if communicated: ...]
d. Non-pecuniary / distress: [Limited in commercial contracts]
3. REMOTENESS
Hadley v Baxendale test: [limb 1 / limb 2 — communicated?]
Achilleas assumption of responsibility: [relevant / not relevant]
4. MITIGATION
Claimant mitigated?: [YES / NO — steps taken: ...]
Deduction for failure to mitigate: [est. GBP/USD X]
5. EQUITABLE RELIEF AVAILABLE?
[ ] Injunction — American Cyanamid test: [serious issue / damages inadequate / balance of convenience]
[ ] Specific performance — unique goods/property: [YES / NO]
[ ] Account of profits — breach fiduciary duty: [applicable / not]
6. TOTAL ESTIMATED RECOVERY
Low: GBP/USD [X] — High: GBP/USD [Y]| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-16 | pass→pass | 10,146 | 14,468 | +43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,678 | 3,842 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 8,660 | 16,110 | +86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,455 | 4,008 | +175% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | 22,129 | 22,734 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,159 | 5,288 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 16,853 | 16,279 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,049 | 4,275 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 19,516 | 17,504 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,499 | 4,432 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 18,851 | 27,741 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,597 | 4,956 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 13,423 | 16,684 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,349 | 4,331 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 11,556 | 17,928 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,109 | 4,397 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 13,281 | 12,267 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,005 | 3,418 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 5,504 | 13,184 | +140% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,008 | 3,766 | +274% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 13,498 | 18,096 | +34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,306 | 4,398 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 5,931 | 6,394 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,126 | 2,511 | +123% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 3,918 | 9,863 | +152% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 768 | 3,250 | +323% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,678 | 8,206 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,308 | 2,807 | +115% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 13,364 | 19,538 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,040 | 4,303 | +111% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 13,246 | 22,362 | +69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,515 | 4,546 | +81% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 18,534 | 17,730 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,763 | 4,573 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 8,100 | 17,321 | +114% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,391 | 4,296 | +209% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 2,831 | 4,536 | +60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 527 | 2,098 | +298% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 16,089 | 15,543 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,351 | 4,071 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 10,259 | 17,430 | +70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,059 | 4,299 | +109% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,631 | 17,950 | +108% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,615 | 4,007 | +148% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +5 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.