Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →AI-powered time-resolved cryo-EM analysis for capturing protein dynamics, drug-binding kinetics, and conformational transitions for dynamics-based drug discovery.
.claude/skills/time-resolved-cryoem-agent/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 146% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 38% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 17% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 30% | 0% |
<!--
#
#
-->
The Time-Resolved Cryo-EM Agent leverages time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy to capture protein dynamics, drug-binding kinetics, and conformational transitions. It integrates AI-powered analysis with experimental time-resolved data to enable dynamics-based drug discovery, moving beyond static structures to understand drug mechanisms in motion.
| Method | Timescale | Resolution | Application | |--------|-----------|------------|-------------| | Rapid Mixing | ms-s | 3-4 Å | Ligand binding | | Temperature Jump | μs-ms | 3-5 Å | Transitions | | Photocaging | μs-ms | 3-5 Å | Triggered reactions | | Flow-Mixing | 10ms-s | 3-4 Å | Enzyme kinetics |
User: "Analyze time-resolved cryo-EM data of this kinase to understand drug binding kinetics and identify targetable intermediate states."
Agent Action:
bashpython3 Skills/Structural_Biology/Time_Resolved_CryoEM_Agent/analyze_dynamics.py \ --timepoints "0ms,10ms,50ms,100ms,500ms,1s" \ --particle_stacks timepoint_particles/ \ --protein_sequence kinase.fasta \ --ligand drug_compound.sdf \ --kinetics_model two_state \ --extract_intermediates true \ --output kinase_dynamics/
| Input | Format | Purpose | |-------|--------|---------| | Particle Stacks | MRC per timepoint | Time-resolved data | | Timepoint Labels | CSV | Time assignments | | Protein Sequence | FASTA | Structure reference | | Ligand Structure | SDF | Binding analysis | | Initial Model | Optional PDB | 3D classification |
| Output | Description | Format | |--------|-------------|--------| | Conformational States | Per-timepoint structures | .pdb | | Kinetics Parameters | kon, koff, Kd | .json | | State Populations | Fraction vs time | .csv | | Conformational Movie | Trajectory animation | .mp4 | | Intermediate Structures | Transient states | .pdb | | Energy Landscape | Free energy surface | .png | | Drug Design Targets | State-specific pockets | .json |
| Parameter | Definition | Drug Design Relevance | |-----------|------------|----------------------| | kon | Association rate | Target engagement speed | | koff | Dissociation rate | Residence time | | Kd | Equilibrium constant | Affinity | | t1/2 | Half-life | Duration of action | | Conformational Rate | State transition speed | Mechanism insight |
Conformational Sorting:
Kinetics Modeling:
Intermediate Detection:
| Application | Dynamic Insight | Design Strategy | |-------------|-----------------|-----------------| | Slow Binding | Long residence time | Optimize koff | | Allosteric Drugs | State stabilization | Target intermediate | | Covalent Inhibitors | Binding trajectory | Optimize approach | | Conformational Selection | State preference | Pre-organize ligand | | Induced Fit | Protein reorganization | Accommodate flexibility |
| Method | Software | Best For | |--------|----------|----------| | 3DVA | cryoSPARC | Principal motions | | Multi-body | RELION | Domain movements | | cryoDRGN | cryoDRGN | Continuous heterogeneity | | 3D Classification | Various | Discrete states |
| Mixing Method | Dead Time | Applications | |---------------|-----------|--------------| | Rapid On-Grid | ~10 ms | Fast binding | | Blot-Free | ~1 ms | Very fast kinetics | | Microfluidic | ~50 ms | Enzyme catalysis | | Spray-Mixing | ~10 ms | Protein-protein |
| Mechanism | Model | Parameters | |-----------|-------|------------| | Two-State | A ⇌ B | kon, koff | | Induced Fit | A + L ⇌ AL ⇌ AL | Multiple rates | | Conformational Selection | A ⇌ A + L ⇌ AL | Pre-equilibrium | | Sequential | A → B → C | Multiple intermediates |
| Method | Purpose | Complementarity | |--------|---------|-----------------| | SPR | Binding kinetics | Validate rates | | ITC | Thermodynamics | Validate ΔG | | NMR | Dynamics | Solution behavior | | MD Simulation | Mechanism | Molecular detail |
| Target | Dynamic Insight | Design Implication | |--------|-----------------|-------------------| | Kinases | DFG-in/out transition | State-selective inhibitors | | GPCRs | Activation pathway | Biased agonists | | Transporters | Alternating access | Mechanism-based design | | ATPases | Catalytic cycle | Allosteric inhibitors |
AI Group - Biomedical AI Platform
<!-- AUTHOR_SIGNATURE: 9a7f3c2e-MD-BABU-MIA-2026-MSSM-SECURE -->
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 20,839 | 26,830 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,237 | 7,637 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 17,647 | 31,137 | +76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,311 | 8,155 | +146% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 31,065 | 24,167 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,230 | 7,185 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 16,227 | 12,445 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,945 | 4,071 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 13,467 | 5,637 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,200 | 2,564 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 32,040 | 19,369 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,440 | 5,791 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 13,347 | 9,526 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,197 | 3,229 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 15,128 | 12,125 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,496 | 3,752 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 5,266 | 6,234 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 828 | 2,727 | +229% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 12,767 | 10,771 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,307 | 3,679 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,840 | 10,743 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,510 | 3,771 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 4,826 | 10,355 | +115% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 878 | 3,467 | +295% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 12,258 | 14,838 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,073 | 3,691 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 14,724 | 10,216 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,258 | 3,254 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 9,850 | 10,050 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,790 | 3,512 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 10,538 | 2,966 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,772 | 2,252 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 7,119 | 7,403 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,257 | 3,072 | +144% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 14,056 | 6,094 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,246 | 2,726 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 5,947 | 6,820 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,128 | 2,953 | +162% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 10,180 | 1,797 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,707 | 1,970 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 10,703 | 3,460 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,036 | 2,326 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 18,408 | 14,516 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,824 | 3,976 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 7/26/2026 | +5% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.