Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →tobihagemann/resolve-findings
Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs /turboplan. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to "resolve findings", "apply evaluated findings", or "dispatch findings to implementation".
Passed 9 of 17 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 17 without it.
and 6 more in the full report
7 fixed5 passed either way10 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
The user has explicitly selected the Plan path to address their complex findings. Which reference document must be read before proceeding with the phases?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Reads references/plan-path.md before executing the plan phases. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Choose a path for evaluated findings and run it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs $turboplan.
At the start, use update_plan to track each step, restating any remaining steps of a parent workflow alongside them:
Present a summary of accepted findings (Apply verdict): count by complexity (mechanical fixes vs. architectural or design changes). Then use request_user_input to let the user choose:
$turboplan for drafting, refinement, approval, implementation, and finalize$apply-findings, then $finalizeSuggest Plan when findings include complex or architectural changes. Suggest Direct when all findings are mechanical fixes.
Add a Get a second opinion option whenever the findings would establish a pattern others will follow, change an interface, or commit to a data shape, and whenever neither path earns the suggestion with conviction. It runs the $consult-claude skill for which path the findings warrant on technical merit. Then resolve the path with that answer in hand, re-asking when the choice stays the user's.
Read the reference file for the confirmed path and follow its phases:
State the chosen path before continuing with the reference file.
Then call update_plan to mark this step completed and continue with the next step of the active workflow.
test cases passed, vs 4 / 17 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.