Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Neuroscience research workflows: neuroanatomy, neural circuits, neurotransmitter biology, neurological/psychiatric disease genetics, neural-protein function. Uses Allen Brain Atlas, WormBase (C. elegans connectome), UniProt for neural proteins, PubMed for primary literature. Use for brain-region biology, neural development, neurodegeneration mechanisms (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS), and synaptic-protein characterization.
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-neuroscience/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-23 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
KEY PRINCIPLES: LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS — use PubMed/EuropePMC for neuroanatomy facts, WormBase for C. elegans connectome data, UniProt for neural protein properties. Verify claims with literature before answering. Use Python computation for quantitative neuroscience problems.
When uncertain about any neuroscience fact — brain region function, neural circuit connectivity, ion channel properties, neurotransmitter receptor subtypes — SEARCH databases first. A PubMed-verified answer is always more reliable than reasoning from memory. This is especially critical for neuroanatomy, where structures have precise boundaries and connectivity patterns that are easy to confuse.
Brain region functions, boundaries, and connectivity are precise anatomical facts. When asked about specific regions, nuclei, or tracts:
WormBase_get_gene for gene expression, neuron identity, connectivity dataAlliance_search_genes for orthologs| Feature | UMN Lesion | LMN Lesion | |---------|-----------|-----------| | Tone | Increased (spastic) | Decreased (flaccid) | | Reflexes | Hyperreflexia, Babinski+ | Hyporeflexia/areflexia | | Atrophy | Minimal (disuse) | Prominent, early | | Fasciculations | Absent | Present | | Distribution | Pyramidal pattern | Specific nerve/root |
UniProt_search for SNCA, LRRK2, PARK7| Tool | Use For | Key Parameters | |------|---------|---------------| | PubMed_search_articles | Neuroanatomy facts, clinical neurology, circuit studies | query, limit | | EuropePMC_search_articles | Broader literature including preprints | query, limit | | WormBase_get_gene | C. elegans neurons, connectome, gene expression | query | | DANDI_search_datasets/DANDI_get_dataset/DANDI_list_assets | Published neurophysiology data (NWB format): spikes, LFP, imaging, behavior | query; dandiset_id | | AllenCellTypes_search_specimens | Single-neuron electrophysiology + morphology specimens (firing rate, input resistance, tau, reconstructions); filter by species/brain region | species (e.g. "Homo Sapiens", "Mus musculus"), brain_structure, limit | | Alliance_search_genes | Cross-species gene search (mouse, fly, fish, worm) | query | | UniProt_search | Neural proteins (ion channels, receptors, disease genes) | query, organism | | proteins_api_search | Protein features, domains, variants | query | | NCBIGene_search | Gene info, orthologs, expression | query | | ClinVar_search_variants | Neurological disease variants | gene, condition | | gwas_search_associations | Neurological trait associations | query | | Orphanet_search_diseases | Rare neurological diseases | query | | kegg_get_pathway_info | Neural signaling pathways | pathway_id | | OpenTargets_multi_entity_search_by_query_string | Drug targets in neurological diseases | query |
For C. elegans neural circuit questions, ALWAYS use WormBase_get_gene to look up specific synapse and connectivity data. Do not guess neural connections from general knowledge.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 16 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +4 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 16 comparable cases. 6 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The publisher has shipped newer versions since this run, so these numbers describe v1, not the version currently listed.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.