Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Gather comprehensive biological target intelligence from 9 parallel research paths covering protein info, structure, interactions, pathways, expression, variants, drug interactions, and literature. Features collision-aware searches, evidence grading (T1-T4), explicit Open Targets coverage, and mandatory completeness auditing. Use when users ask about drug targets, proteins, genes, or need target validation, druggability assessment, or comprehensive target profiling.
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-target-research/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-13 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
Gather complete target intelligence by exploring 9 parallel research paths. Supports targets identified by gene symbol, UniProt accession, Ensembl ID, or gene name.
KEY PRINCIPLES:
get_tool_info before calling unfamiliar toolsBEFORE calling ANY tool for the first time, verify its parameters:
python# Always check tool params to prevent silent failures tool_info = tu.tools.get_tool_info(tool_name="Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways") # Reveals: takes `id` not `uniprot_id`
| Tool | WRONG Parameter | CORRECT Parameter | |------|-----------------|-------------------| | Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways | uniprot_id | id | | ensembl_get_xrefs | gene_id | id | | GTEx_get_median_gene_expression | gencode_id only | gencode_id + operation="median" | | OpenTargets_* | ensemblID | ensemblId (camelCase) |
GTEx often requires versioned Ensembl IDs. If ENSG00000123456 returns empty:
python# Step 1: Get gene info with version gene_info = tu.tools.ensembl_lookup_gene(id=ensembl_id, species="human") version = gene_info.get('version', 1) # Step 2: Try versioned ID versioned_id = f"{ensembl_id}.{version}" # e.g., "ENSG00000123456.12" result = tu.tools.GTEx_get_median_gene_expression( gencode_id=versioned_id, operation="median" )
Apply when users:
DO NOT show the search process or tool outputs to the user. Instead:
[TARGET]_target_report.md[Researching...] in each section[Researching...] with actual content[TARGET]_methods_appendix.mdCRITICAL: Grade every claim by evidence strength.
| Tier | Symbol | Criteria | Examples | |------|--------|----------|----------| | T1 | ★★★ | Direct mechanistic evidence, human genetic proof | CRISPR KO, patient mutations, crystal structure with mechanism | | T2 | ★★☆ | Functional studies, model organism validation | siRNA phenotype, mouse KO, biochemical assay | | T3 | ★☆☆ | Association, screen hits, computational | GWAS hit, DepMap essentiality, expression correlation | | T4 | ☆☆☆ | Mention, review, text-mined, predicted | Review article, database annotation, computational prediction |
Evidence grades MUST appear in:
markdown--- **Evidence Quality for this Section**: Strong - Mechanistic (T1): 12 papers - Functional (T2): 8 papers - Association (T3): 15 papers - Mention (T4): 23 papers **Data Gaps**: No CRISPR data; mouse KO phenotypes limited ---
Every piece of information MUST include its source:
markdownEGFR mutations cause lung adenocarcinoma [★★★: PMID:15118125, activating mutations in patients]. *Source: ClinVar, CIViC*
Execute 9 research paths (Path 0 is always first):
Target Query (e.g., "EGFR" or "P00533")
│
├─ IDENTIFIER RESOLUTION (always first)
│ └─ Check if GPCR → GPCRdb_get_protein
│
├─ PATH 0: Open Targets Foundation (ALWAYS FIRST - fills gaps in all other paths)
│
├─ PATH 1: Core Identity (names, IDs, sequence, organism)
│ └─ InterProScan_scan_sequence for novel domain prediction (NEW)
├─ PATH 2: Structure & Domains (3D structure, domains, binding sites)
│ └─ If GPCR: GPCRdb_get_structures (active/inactive states)
├─ PATH 3: Function & Pathways (GO terms, pathways, biological role)
├─ PATH 4: Protein Interactions (PPI network, complexes)
├─ PATH 5: Expression Profile (tissue expression, single-cell)
├─ PATH 6: Variants & Disease (mutations, clinical significance)
│ └─ DisGeNET_search_gene for curated gene-disease associations
├─ PATH 7: Drug Interactions (known drugs, druggability, safety)
│ ├─ Pharos_get_target for TDL classification (Tclin/Tchem/Tbio/Tdark)
│ ├─ BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot for known ligands (NEW)
│ ├─ PubChem_search_assays_by_target_gene for HTS data (NEW)
│ ├─ If GPCR: GPCRdb_get_ligands (curated agonists/antagonists)
│ └─ DepMap_get_gene_dependencies for target essentiality
└─ PATH 8: Literature & Research (publications, trends)CRITICAL: Resolve ALL identifiers before any research path.
pythondef resolve_target_ids(tu, query): """ Resolve target query to ALL needed identifiers. Returns dict with: query, uniprot, ensembl, ensembl_version, symbol, entrez, chembl_target, hgnc """ ids = { 'query': query, 'uniprot': None, 'ensembl': None, 'ensembl_versioned': None, # For GTEx 'symbol': None, 'entrez': None, 'chembl_target': None, 'hgnc': None, 'full_name': None, 'synonyms': [] } # [Resolution logic based on input type] # ... (see current implementation) # CRITICAL: Get versioned Ensembl ID for GTEx if ids['ensembl']: gene_info = tu.tools.ensembl_lookup_gene(id=ids['ensembl'], species="human") if gene_info and gene_info.get('version'): ids['ensembl_versioned'] = f"{ids['ensembl']}.{gene_info['version']}" # Also get synonyms for literature collision detection ids['full_name'] = gene_info.get('description', '').split(' [')[0] # Get UniProt alternative names for synonyms if ids['uniprot']: alt_names = tu.tools.UniProt_get_alternative_names_by_accession(accession=ids['uniprot']) if alt_names: ids['synonyms'].extend(alt_names) return ids
~35% of approved drugs target GPCRs. After identifier resolution, check if target is a GPCR:
pythondef check_gpcr_target(tu, ids): """ Check if target is a GPCR and retrieve specialized data. Call after identifier resolution. """ symbol = ids.get('symbol', '') # Build GPCRdb entry name entry_name = f"{symbol.lower()}_human" gpcr_info = tu.tools.GPCRdb_get_protein( operation="get_protein", protein=entry_name ) if gpcr_info.get('status') == 'success': # Target is a GPCR - get specialized data # Get structures with receptor state structures = tu.tools.GPCRdb_get_structures( operation="get_structures", protein=entry_name ) # Get known ligands (critical for binder projects) ligands = tu.tools.GPCRdb_get_ligands( operation="get_ligands", protein=entry_name ) # Get mutation data mutations = tu.tools.GPCRdb_get_mutations( operation="get_mutations", protein=entry_name ) return { 'is_gpcr': True, 'gpcr_family': gpcr_info['data'].get('family'), 'gpcr_class': gpcr_info['data'].get('receptor_class'), 'structures': structures.get('data', {}).get('structures', []), 'ligands': ligands.get('data', {}).get('ligands', []), 'mutations': mutations.get('data', {}).get('mutations', []), 'ballesteros_numbering': True # GPCRdb provides this } return {'is_gpcr': False}
GPCRdb Report Section (add to Section 2 for GPCR targets):
markdown### 2.x GPCR-Specific Data (GPCRdb) **Receptor Class**: Class A (Rhodopsin-like) **GPCR Family**: Adrenoceptors **Structures by State**: | PDB ID | State | Resolution | Ligand | Year | |--------|-------|------------|--------|------| | 3SN6 | Active | 3.2Å | Agonist (BI-167107) | 2011 | | 2RH1 | Inactive | 2.4Å | Antagonist (carazolol) | 2007 | **Known Ligands**: 45 agonists, 32 antagonists, 8 allosteric modulators **Key Binding Site Residues** (Ballesteros-Weinstein): 3.32, 5.42, 6.48, 7.39
Before literature search, detect naming collisions:
pythondef detect_collisions(tu, symbol, full_name): """ Detect if gene symbol has naming collisions in literature. Returns negative filter terms if collisions found. """ # Search by symbol in title results = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles( query=f'"{symbol}"[Title]', limit=20 ) # Check if >20% are off-topic off_topic_terms = [] for paper in results.get('articles', []): title = paper.get('title', '').lower() # Check if title mentions biology/protein/gene context bio_terms = ['protein', 'gene', 'cell', 'expression', 'mutation', 'kinase', 'receptor'] if not any(term in title for term in bio_terms): # Extract potential collision terms # e.g., "JAK" might collide with "Just Another Kinase" jokes # e.g., "WDR7" might collide with other WDR family members in certain contexts pass # Build negative filter collision_filter = "" if off_topic_terms: collision_filter = " NOT " + " NOT ".join(off_topic_terms) return collision_filter
Objective: Populate baseline data for Sections 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 before specialized queries.
CRITICAL: Open Targets provides the most comprehensive aggregated data. Query ALL these endpoints:
| Endpoint | Section | Data Type | |----------|---------|-----------| | OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensemblId | 8 | Diseases/phenotypes | | OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblId | 9 | Druggability assessment | | OpenTargets_get_target_safety_profile_by_ensemblId | 10 | Safety liabilities | | OpenTargets_get_target_interactions_by_ensemblId | 6 | PPI network | | OpenTargets_get_target_gene_ontology_by_ensemblId | 5 | GO annotations | | OpenTargets_get_publications_by_target_ensemblId | 11 | Literature | | OpenTargets_get_biological_mouse_models_by_ensemblId | 8/10 | Mouse KO phenotypes | | OpenTargets_get_chemical_probes_by_target_ensemblId | 9 | Chemical probes | | OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblId | 9 | Known drugs |
pythondef path_0_open_targets(tu, ids): """ Open Targets foundation data - fills gaps for sections 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11. ALWAYS run this first. """ ensembl_id = ids['ensembl'] if not ensembl_id: return {'status': 'skipped', 'reason': 'No Ensembl ID'} results = {} # 1. Diseases & Phenotypes (Section 8) diseases = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['diseases'] = diseases if diseases else {'note': 'No disease associations returned'} # 2. Tractability (Section 9) tractability = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['tractability'] = tractability if tractability else {'note': 'No tractability data returned'} # 3. Safety Profile (Section 10) safety = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_safety_profile_by_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['safety'] = safety if safety else {'note': 'No safety liabilities identified'} # 4. Interactions (Section 6) interactions = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_interactions_by_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['interactions'] = interactions if interactions else {'note': 'No interactions returned'} # 5. GO Annotations (Section 5) go_terms = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_gene_ontology_by_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['go_terms'] = go_terms if go_terms else {'note': 'No GO annotations returned'} # 6. Publications (Section 11) publications = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_publications_by_target_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['publications'] = publications if publications else {'note': 'No publications returned'} # 7. Mouse Models (Section 8/10) mouse_models = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_biological_mouse_models_by_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['mouse_models'] = mouse_models if mouse_models else {'note': 'No mouse model data returned'} # 8. Chemical Probes (Section 9) probes = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_chemical_probes_by_target_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['chemical_probes'] = probes if probes else {'note': 'No chemical probes available'} # 9. Associated Drugs (Section 9) drugs = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblId( ensemblId=ensembl_id ) results['drugs'] = drugs if drugs else {'note': 'No approved/trial drugs found'} return results
CRITICAL: Always document when a query returns empty:
markdown### 9.3 Chemical Probes **Status**: No validated chemical probes available for this target. *Source: OpenTargets_get_chemical_probes_by_target_ensemblId returned empty* **Implication**: Tool compound development would be needed for chemical biology studies.
Objective: Robust structure coverage using 3-step chain.
Do NOT rely solely on PDB text search. Use this chain:
pythondef path_structure_robust(tu, ids): """ Robust structure search using 3-step chain. """ structures = {'pdb': [], 'alphafold': None, 'domains': [], 'method_notes': []} # STEP 1: UniProt PDB Cross-References (most reliable) if ids['uniprot']: entry = tu.tools.UniProt_get_entry_by_accession(accession=ids['uniprot']) pdb_xrefs = [x for x in entry.get('uniProtKBCrossReferences', []) if x.get('database') == 'PDB'] for xref in pdb_xrefs: pdb_id = xref.get('id') # Get details for each PDB pdb_info = tu.tools.get_protein_metadata_by_pdb_id(pdb_id=pdb_id) if pdb_info: structures['pdb'].append(pdb_info) structures['method_notes'].append(f"Step 1: {len(pdb_xrefs)} PDB cross-refs from UniProt") # STEP 2: Sequence-based PDB Search (catches missing annotations) if ids['uniprot'] and len(structures['pdb']) < 5: sequence = tu.tools.UniProt_get_sequence_by_accession(accession=ids['uniprot']) if sequence and len(sequence) < 1000: # Reasonable length for search similar = tu.tools.PDB_search_similar_structures( sequence=sequence[:500], # Use first 500 AA if long identity_cutoff=0.7 ) if similar: for hit in similar[:10]: # Top 10 similar if hit['pdb_id'] not in [s.get('pdb_id') for s in structures['pdb']]: structures['pdb'].append(hit) structures['method_notes'].append(f"Step 2: Sequence search (identity ≥70%)") # STEP 3: Domain-based Search (for multi-domain proteins) if ids['uniprot']: domains = tu.tools.InterPro_get_protein_domains(uniprot_accession=ids['uniprot']) structures['domains'] = domains if domains else [] # For large proteins with domains, search by domain sequence windows if len(structures['pdb']) < 3 and domains: for domain in domains[:3]: # Top 3 domains domain_name = domain.get('name', '') # Could search PDB by domain name domain_hits = tu.tools.PDB_search_by_keyword(query=domain_name, limit=5) if domain_hits: structures['method_notes'].append(f"Step 3: Domain '{domain_name}' search") # AlphaFold (always check) alphafold = tu.tools.alphafold_get_prediction(uniprot_accession=ids['uniprot']) structures['alphafold'] = alphafold if alphafold else {'note': 'No AlphaFold prediction'} # IMPORTANT: Document limitations if not structures['pdb']: structures['limitation'] = "No direct PDB hit does NOT mean no structure exists. Check: (1) structures under different UniProt entries, (2) homolog structures, (3) domain-only structures." return structures
markdown### 4.1 Experimental Structures (PDB) **Total PDB Entries**: 23 structures *(Source: UniProt cross-references)* **Search Method**: 3-step chain (UniProt xrefs → sequence search → domain search) | PDB ID | Resolution | Method | Ligand | Coverage | Year | |--------|------------|--------|--------|----------|------| | 1M17 | 2.6Å | X-ray | Erlotinib | 672-998 | 2002 | | 3POZ | 2.8Å | X-ray | Gefitinib | 696-1022 | 2010 | **Note**: "No direct PDB hit" ≠ "no structure exists". Check homologs and domain structures.
pythondef path_expression(tu, ids): """ Expression data with GTEx versioned ID fallback. """ results = {'gtex': None, 'hpa': None, 'failed_tools': []} # GTEx with fallback ensembl_id = ids['ensembl'] versioned_id = ids.get('ensembl_versioned') # Try unversioned first gtex_result = tu.tools.GTEx_get_median_gene_expression( gencode_id=ensembl_id, operation="median" ) # Fallback to versioned if empty if not gtex_result or gtex_result.get('data') == []: if versioned_id: gtex_result = tu.tools.GTEx_get_median_gene_expression( gencode_id=versioned_id, operation="median" ) if gtex_result and gtex_result.get('data'): results['gtex'] = gtex_result results['gtex_note'] = f"Used versioned ID: {versioned_id}" if not results.get('gtex'): results['failed_tools'].append({ 'tool': 'GTEx_get_median_gene_expression', 'tried': [ensembl_id, versioned_id], 'fallback': 'See HPA data below' }) else: results['gtex'] = gtex_result # HPA (always query as backup) hpa_result = tu.tools.HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source(ensembl_id=ensembl_id) results['hpa'] = hpa_result if hpa_result else {'note': 'No HPA RNA data'} return results
HPA provides comprehensive protein expression data including tissue-level, cell-level, and cell line expression.
pythondef get_hpa_comprehensive_expression(tu, gene_symbol): """ Get comprehensive expression data from Human Protein Atlas. Provides: - Tissue expression (protein and RNA) - Subcellular localization - Cell line expression comparison - Tissue specificity """ # 1. Search for gene to get IDs gene_info = tu.tools.HPA_search_genes_by_query(search_query=gene_symbol) if not gene_info: return {'error': f'Gene {gene_symbol} not found in HPA'} # 2. Get tissue expression with specificity tissue_search = tu.tools.HPA_generic_search( search_query=gene_symbol, columns="g,gs,rnat,rnatsm,scml,scal", # Gene, synonyms, tissue specificity, subcellular format="json" ) # 3. Compare expression in cancer cell lines vs normal tissue cell_lines = ['a549', 'mcf7', 'hela', 'hepg2', 'pc3'] cell_line_expression = {} for cell_line in cell_lines: try: expr = tu.tools.HPA_get_comparative_expression_by_gene_and_cellline( gene_name=gene_symbol, cell_line=cell_line ) cell_line_expression[cell_line] = expr except: continue return { 'gene_info': gene_info, 'tissue_data': tissue_search, 'cell_line_expression': cell_line_expression, 'source': 'Human Protein Atlas' }
HPA Expression Output for Report:
markdown### Tissue Expression Profile (Human Protein Atlas) | Tissue | Protein Level | RNA nTPM | Specificity | |--------|---------------|----------|-------------| | Brain | High | 45.2 | Enriched | | Liver | Medium | 23.1 | Enhanced | | Kidney | Low | 8.4 | Not detected | **Subcellular Localization**: Cytoplasm, Plasma membrane ### Cancer Cell Line Expression | Cell Line | Cancer Type | Expression | vs Normal | |-----------|-------------|------------|-----------| | A549 | Lung | High | Elevated | | MCF7 | Breast | Medium | Similar | | HeLa | Cervical | High | Elevated | *Source: Human Protein Atlas via `HPA_search_genes_by_query`, `HPA_get_comparative_expression_by_gene_and_cellline`*
Why HPA for Target Research:
markdown### 8.3 Clinical Variants (ClinVar) #### Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) | Variant | Clinical Significance | Condition | Review Status | PMID | |---------|----------------------|-----------|---------------|------| | p.L858R | Pathogenic | Lung cancer | 4 stars | 15118125 | | p.T790M | Pathogenic | Drug resistance | 4 stars | 15737014 | **Total Pathogenic SNVs**: 47 #### Copy Number Variants (CNVs) - Reported Separately | Type | Region | Clinical Significance | Frequency | |------|--------|----------------------|-----------| | Amplification | 7p11.2 | Pathogenic | Common in cancer | *Note: CNV data separated as it represents different mutation mechanism*
DisGeNET provides curated gene-disease associations with evidence scores. Requires: DISGENET_API_KEY
pythondef get_disgenet_associations(tu, ids): """ Get gene-disease associations from DisGeNET. Complements Open Targets with curated association scores. """ symbol = ids.get('symbol') if not symbol: return {'status': 'skipped', 'reason': 'No gene symbol'} # Get all disease associations for gene gda = tu.tools.DisGeNET_search_gene( operation="search_gene", gene=symbol, limit=50 ) if gda.get('status') != 'success': return {'status': 'error', 'message': 'DisGeNET query failed'} associations = gda.get('data', {}).get('associations', []) # Categorize by evidence strength strong = [] # score >= 0.7 moderate = [] # score 0.4-0.7 weak = [] # score < 0.4 for assoc in associations: score = assoc.get('score', 0) disease_name = assoc.get('disease_name', '') umls_cui = assoc.get('disease_id', '') entry = { 'disease': disease_name, 'umls_cui': umls_cui, 'score': score, 'evidence_index': assoc.get('ei'), 'dsi': assoc.get('dsi'), # Disease Specificity Index 'dpi': assoc.get('dpi') # Disease Pleiotropy Index } if score >= 0.7: strong.append(entry) elif score >= 0.4: moderate.append(entry) else: weak.append(entry) return { 'total_associations': len(associations), 'strong_associations': strong, 'moderate_associations': moderate, 'weak_associations': weak[:10], # Limit weak 'disease_pleiotropy': len(associations) # How many diseases linked }
DisGeNET Report Section (add to Section 8 - Disease Associations):
markdown### 8.x DisGeNET Gene-Disease Associations (NEW) **Total Diseases Associated**: 47 **Disease Pleiotropy Index**: High (gene linked to many disease types) #### Strong Associations (Score ≥0.7) | Disease | UMLS CUI | Score | Evidence Index | |---------|----------|-------|----------------| | Non-small cell lung cancer | C0007131 | 0.85 | 0.92 | | Glioblastoma | C0017636 | 0.78 | 0.88 | #### Moderate Associations (Score 0.4-0.7) | Disease | UMLS CUI | Score | DSI | |---------|----------|-------|-----| | Breast cancer | C0006142 | 0.62 | 0.45 | *Note: DisGeNET score integrates curated databases, GWAS, animal models, and literature*
Evidence Tier Assignment:
NIH's Illuminating the Druggable Genome (IDG) portal provides TDL classification for all human proteins:
pythondef get_pharos_target_info(tu, ids): """ Get Pharos/TCRD target development level and druggability. TDL Classification: - Tclin: Approved drug targets - Tchem: Targets with small molecule activities (IC50 < 30nM) - Tbio: Targets with biological annotations - Tdark: Understudied proteins """ gene_symbol = ids.get('symbol') uniprot = ids.get('uniprot') # Try by gene symbol first if gene_symbol: result = tu.tools.Pharos_get_target( gene=gene_symbol ) elif uniprot: result = tu.tools.Pharos_get_target( uniprot=uniprot ) else: return {'status': 'error', 'message': 'Need gene symbol or UniProt'} if result.get('status') == 'success' and result.get('data'): target = result['data'] return { 'name': target.get('name'), 'symbol': target.get('sym'), 'tdl': target.get('tdl'), # Tclin/Tchem/Tbio/Tdark 'family': target.get('fam'), # Kinase, GPCR, etc. 'novelty': target.get('novelty'), 'description': target.get('description'), 'publications': target.get('publicationCount'), 'interpretation': interpret_tdl(target.get('tdl')) } return None def interpret_tdl(tdl): """Interpret Target Development Level for druggability.""" interpretations = { 'Tclin': 'Approved drug target - highest confidence for druggability', 'Tchem': 'Small molecule active - good chemical tractability', 'Tbio': 'Biologically characterized - may require novel modalities', 'Tdark': 'Understudied - limited data, high novelty potential' } return interpretations.get(tdl, 'Unknown') def search_disease_targets(tu, disease_name): """Find targets associated with a disease via Pharos.""" result = tu.tools.Pharos_get_disease_targets( disease=disease_name, top=50 ) if result.get('status') == 'success': targets = result['data'].get('targets', []) # Group by TDL for prioritization by_tdl = {'Tclin': [], 'Tchem': [], 'Tbio': [], 'Tdark': []} for t in targets: tdl = t.get('tdl', 'Unknown') if tdl in by_tdl: by_tdl[tdl].append(t) return by_tdl return None
Pharos Report Section (add to Section 9 - Druggability):
markdown### 9.x Pharos/TCRD Target Classification (NEW) **Target Development Level**: Tchem **Protein Family**: Kinase **Novelty Score**: 0.35 (moderately studied) **Publication Count**: 12,456 **TDL Interpretation**: Target has validated small molecule activities with IC50 < 30nM. Good chemical starting points exist. **Disease Targets Analysis** (for disease-centric queries): | TDL | Count | Examples | |-----|-------|----------| | Tclin | 12 | EGFR, ALK, RET | | Tchem | 45 | KRAS, SHP2, CDK4 | | Tbio | 78 | Novel kinases | | Tdark | 23 | Understudied | *Source: Pharos/TCRD via `Pharos_get_target`*
CRISPR knockout data from cancer cell lines to validate target essentiality:
pythondef assess_target_essentiality(tu, ids): """ Is this target essential for cancer cell survival? Negative effect scores = gene is essential (cells die upon KO) """ gene_symbol = ids.get('symbol') if not gene_symbol: return {'status': 'error', 'message': 'Need gene symbol'} deps = tu.tools.DepMap_get_gene_dependencies( gene_symbol=gene_symbol ) if deps.get('status') == 'success': return { 'gene': gene_symbol, 'data': deps.get('data', {}), 'interpretation': 'Negative scores indicate gene is essential for cell survival', 'note': 'Score < -0.5 is strongly essential, < -1.0 is extremely essential' } return None def get_cancer_type_essentiality(tu, gene_symbol, cancer_type): """Check if gene is essential in specific cancer type.""" # Get cell lines for cancer type cell_lines = tu.tools.DepMap_get_cell_lines( cancer_type=cancer_type, page_size=20 ) return { 'gene': gene_symbol, 'cancer_type': cancer_type, 'cell_lines': cell_lines.get('data', {}).get('cell_lines', []), 'note': 'Query individual cell lines for dependency scores via DepMap portal' }
DepMap Report Section (add to Section 9 - Druggability):
markdown### 9.x Target Essentiality (DepMap) (NEW) **Gene Essentiality Assessment**: | Context | Effect Score | Interpretation | |---------|--------------|----------------| | Pan-cancer | -0.42 | Moderately essential | | Lung cancer | -0.78 | Strongly essential | | Breast cancer | -0.21 | Weakly essential | **Selectivity**: Differential essentiality suggests cancer-type selective target **Cell Lines Tested**: 1,054 cancer cell lines from DepMap *Interpretation*: Score < -0.5 indicates strong dependency. This target is more essential in lung cancer than other cancer types - suggesting lung-selective targeting may be feasible. *Source: DepMap via `DepMap_get_gene_dependencies`*
For uncharacterized proteins, run InterProScan to predict domains and function:
pythondef predict_protein_domains(tu, sequence, title="Query protein"): """ Run InterProScan for de novo domain prediction. Use when: - Protein has no InterPro annotations - Novel/uncharacterized protein - Custom sequence analysis """ result = tu.tools.InterProScan_scan_sequence( sequence=sequence, title=title, go_terms=True, pathways=True ) if result.get('status') == 'success': data = result.get('data', {}) # Job may still be running if data.get('job_status') == 'RUNNING': return { 'job_id': data.get('job_id'), 'status': 'running', 'note': 'Use InterProScan_get_job_results to retrieve when ready' } # Parse completed results return { 'domains': data.get('domains', []), 'domain_count': data.get('domain_count', 0), 'go_annotations': data.get('go_annotations', []), 'pathways': data.get('pathways', []), 'sequence_length': data.get('sequence_length') } return None def check_interproscan_job(tu, job_id): """Check status and get results for InterProScan job.""" status = tu.tools.InterProScan_get_job_status(job_id=job_id) if status.get('data', {}).get('is_finished'): results = tu.tools.InterProScan_get_job_results(job_id=job_id) return results.get('data', {}) return status.get('data', {})
When to use InterProScan:
InterProScan Report Section (for novel proteins):
markdown### Domain Prediction (InterProScan) (NEW) *Used for uncharacterized protein analysis* **Predicted Domains**: | Domain | Database | Start-End | E-value | InterPro Entry | |--------|----------|-----------|---------|----------------| | Protein kinase domain | Pfam | 45-305 | 1.2e-89 | IPR000719 | | SH2 domain | SMART | 320-410 | 3.4e-45 | IPR000980 | **Predicted GO Terms**: - GO:0004672 protein kinase activity - GO:0005524 ATP binding **Predicted Pathways**: - Reactome: Signal Transduction *Source: InterProScan via `InterProScan_scan_sequence`*
BindingDB provides experimental binding affinity data (Ki, IC50, Kd) for target-ligand pairs:
pythondef get_bindingdb_ligands(tu, uniprot_id, affinity_cutoff=10000): """ Get ligands with measured binding affinities from BindingDB. Critical for: - Identifying chemical starting points - Understanding existing chemical matter - Assessing tractability with small molecules Args: uniprot_id: UniProt accession (e.g., P00533 for EGFR) affinity_cutoff: Maximum affinity in nM (lower = more potent) """ # Get ligands by UniProt result = tu.tools.BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot( uniprot=uniprot_id, affinity_cutoff=affinity_cutoff ) if result: ligands = [] for entry in result: ligands.append({ 'smiles': entry.get('smile'), 'affinity_type': entry.get('affinity_type'), # Ki, IC50, Kd 'affinity_nM': entry.get('affinity'), 'monomer_id': entry.get('monomerid'), 'pmid': entry.get('pmid') }) # Sort by affinity (most potent first) ligands.sort(key=lambda x: float(x['affinity_nM']) if x['affinity_nM'] else float('inf')) return { 'total_ligands': len(ligands), 'ligands': ligands[:20], # Top 20 most potent 'best_affinity': ligands[0]['affinity_nM'] if ligands else None } return {'total_ligands': 0, 'ligands': [], 'note': 'No ligands found in BindingDB'} def get_ligands_by_structure(tu, pdb_id, affinity_cutoff=10000): """Get ligands for a protein by PDB structure ID.""" result = tu.tools.BindingDB_get_ligands_by_pdb( pdb_ids=pdb_id, affinity_cutoff=affinity_cutoff, sequence_identity=100 ) return result def find_compound_targets(tu, smiles, similarity_cutoff=0.85): """Find other targets for a compound (polypharmacology).""" result = tu.tools.BindingDB_get_targets_by_compound( smiles=smiles, similarity_cutoff=similarity_cutoff ) return result
BindingDB Report Section (add to Section 9 - Druggability):
markdown### Known Ligands (BindingDB) (NEW) **Total Ligands with Binding Data**: 156 **Best Reported Affinity**: 0.3 nM (Ki) #### Most Potent Ligands | SMILES | Affinity Type | Value (nM) | Source PMID | |--------|---------------|------------|-------------| | CC(=O)Nc1ccc(cc1)c2... | Ki | 0.3 | 15737014 | | CN(C)C/C=C/C(=O)Nc1... | IC50 | 0.8 | 15896103 | | COc1cc2ncnc(Nc3ccc... | Kd | 2.1 | 16460808 | **Chemical Tractability Assessment**: - ✅ **Tchem-level target**: Multiple ligands with <30nM affinity - ✅ **Diverse chemotypes**: Multiple scaffolds identified - ✅ **Published literature**: Ligands have PMID references *Source: BindingDB via `BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot`*
Affinity Interpretation for Druggability: | Affinity Range | Interpretation | Drug Development Potential | |----------------|----------------|---------------------------| | <1 nM | Ultra-potent | Clinical compound likely | | 1-10 nM | Highly potent | Drug-like | | 10-100 nM | Potent | Good starting point | | 100-1000 nM | Moderate | Needs optimization | | >1000 nM | Weak | Early hit only |
PubChem BioAssay provides HTS screening data and dose-response curves:
pythondef get_pubchem_assays_for_target(tu, gene_symbol): """ Get bioassays targeting a gene from PubChem. Provides: - HTS screening results - Dose-response data (IC50/EC50) - Active compound counts """ # Search assays by target gene assays = tu.tools.PubChem_search_assays_by_target_gene( gene_symbol=gene_symbol ) assay_info = [] if assays.get('data', {}).get('aids'): for aid in assays['data']['aids'][:10]: # Top 10 assays # Get assay details summary = tu.tools.PubChem_get_assay_summary(aid=aid) targets = tu.tools.PubChem_get_assay_targets(aid=aid) assay_info.append({ 'aid': aid, 'summary': summary.get('data', {}), 'targets': targets.get('data', {}) }) return { 'total_assays': len(assays.get('data', {}).get('aids', [])), 'assay_details': assay_info } def get_active_compounds_from_assay(tu, aid): """Get active compounds from a specific bioassay.""" actives = tu.tools.PubChem_get_assay_active_compounds(aid=aid) return { 'aid': aid, 'active_cids': actives.get('data', {}).get('cids', []), 'count': len(actives.get('data', {}).get('cids', [])) }
PubChem BioAssay Report Section:
markdown### PubChem BioAssay Data (NEW) **Assays Targeting This Gene**: 45 | AID | Assay Type | Active Compounds | Target Info | |-----|------------|------------------|-------------| | 1053104 | Dose-response | 12 | EGFR kinase | | 504526 | HTS | 234 | EGFR binding | | 651564 | Confirmatory | 8 | EGFR cellular | **Total Active Compounds Across Assays**: ~500 *Source: PubChem via `PubChem_search_assays_by_target_gene`, `PubChem_get_assay_active_compounds`*
pythondef path_literature_collision_aware(tu, ids): """ Literature search with collision detection and filtering. """ symbol = ids['symbol'] full_name = ids.get('full_name', '') uniprot = ids['uniprot'] synonyms = ids.get('synonyms', []) # Step 1: Detect collisions collision_filter = detect_collisions(tu, symbol, full_name) # Step 2: Build high-precision seed queries seed_queries = [ f'"{symbol}"[Title] AND (protein OR gene OR expression)', # Symbol in title f'"{full_name}"[Title]' if full_name else None, # Full name in title f'"UniProt:{uniprot}"' if uniprot else None, # UniProt accession ] seed_queries = [q for q in seed_queries if q] # Add key synonyms for syn in synonyms[:3]: seed_queries.append(f'"{syn}"[Title]') # Step 3: Execute seed queries and collect PMIDs seed_pmids = set() for query in seed_queries: if collision_filter: query = f"({query}){collision_filter}" results = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(query=query, limit=30) for article in results.get('articles', []): seed_pmids.add(article.get('pmid')) # Step 4: Expand via citation network (for sparse targets) if len(seed_pmids) < 30: expanded_pmids = set() for pmid in list(seed_pmids)[:10]: # Top 10 seeds # Get related articles related = tu.tools.PubMed_get_related(pmid=pmid, limit=20) for r in related.get('articles', []): expanded_pmids.add(r.get('pmid')) # Get citing articles citing = tu.tools.EuropePMC_get_citations(pmid=pmid, limit=20) for c in citing.get('citations', []): expanded_pmids.add(c.get('pmid')) seed_pmids.update(expanded_pmids) # Step 5: Classify papers by evidence tier papers_by_tier = {'T1': [], 'T2': [], 'T3': [], 'T4': []} # ... classification logic based on title/abstract keywords return { 'total_papers': len(seed_pmids), 'collision_filter_applied': collision_filter if collision_filter else 'None needed', 'seed_queries': seed_queries, 'papers_by_tier': papers_by_tier }
For each critical tool, implement retry with exponential backoff:
pythondef call_with_retry(tu, tool_name, params, max_retries=3): """ Call tool with retry logic. """ for attempt in range(max_retries): try: result = getattr(tu.tools, tool_name)(**params) if result and not result.get('error'): return result except Exception as e: if attempt < max_retries - 1: time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff else: return {'error': str(e), 'tool': tool_name, 'attempts': max_retries} return None
| Primary Tool | Fallback 1 | Fallback 2 | Failure Action | |--------------|------------|------------|----------------| | ChEMBL_get_target_activities | GtoPdb_get_target_ligands | OpenTargets drugs | Note in report | | intact_get_interactions | STRING_get_protein_interactions | OpenTargets interactions | Note in report | | GO_get_annotations_for_gene | OpenTargets GO | MyGene GO | Note in report | | GTEx_get_median_gene_expression | HPA_get_rna_expression | Note as unavailable | Document in report | | gnomad_get_gene_constraints | OpenTargets constraint | - | Note in report | | DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions | OpenTargets drugs | GtoPdb | Note in report |
NEVER silently skip failed tools. Always document:
markdown### 7.1 Tissue Expression **GTEx Data**: Unavailable (API timeout after 3 attempts) **Fallback Data (HPA)**: | Tissue | Expression Level | Specificity | |--------|-----------------|-------------| | Liver | High | Enhanced | | Kidney | Medium | - | *Note: For complete GTEx data, query directly at gtexportal.org*
| Section | Minimum Data | If Not Met | |---------|--------------|------------| | 6. PPIs | ≥20 interactors | Document which tools failed + why | | 7. Expression | Top 10 tissues with TPM + HPA RNA summary | Note "limited data" with specific gaps | | 8. Disease | Top 10 OT diseases + gnomAD constraints + ClinVar summary | Separate SNV/CNV; note if constraint unavailable | | 9. Druggability | OT tractability + probes + drugs + DGIdb + GtoPdb fallback | "No drugs/probes" is valid data | | 11. Literature | Total count + 5-year trend + 3-5 key papers with evidence tiers | Note if sparse (<50 papers) |
Before finalizing the report, run this checklist:
markdown## Completeness Audit (REQUIRED) ### Data Minimums Check - [ ] PPIs: ≥20 interactors OR explanation why fewer - [ ] Expression: Top 10 tissues with values OR explicit "unavailable" - [ ] Diseases: Top 10 associations with scores OR "no associations" - [ ] Constraints: All 4 scores (pLI, LOEUF, missense Z, pRec) OR "unavailable" - [ ] Druggability: All modalities assessed; probes + drugs listed OR "none" ### Negative Results Documented - [ ] Empty tool results noted explicitly (not left blank) - [ ] Failed tools with fallbacks documented - [ ] "No data" sections have implications noted ### Evidence Quality - [ ] T1-T4 grades in Executive Summary disease claims - [ ] T1-T4 grades in Disease Associations table - [ ] Key papers table has evidence tiers - [ ] Per-section evidence summaries included ### Source Attribution - [ ] Every data point has source tool/database cited - [ ] Section-end source summaries present
markdown## 15. Data Gaps & Limitations | Section | Expected Data | Actual | Reason | Alternative Source | |---------|---------------|--------|--------|-------------------| | 6. PPIs | ≥20 interactors | 8 | Novel target, limited studies | Literature review needed | | 7. Expression | GTEx TPM | None | Versioned ID not recognized | See HPA data | | 9. Probes | Chemical probes | None | No validated probes exist | Consider tool compound dev | **Recommendations for Data Gaps**: 1. For PPIs: Query BioGRID with broader parameters; check yeast-2-hybrid studies 2. For Expression: Query GEO directly for tissue-specific datasets
File: [TARGET]_target_report.md
markdown# Target Intelligence Report: [TARGET NAME] **Generated**: [Date] | **Query**: [Original query] | **Status**: In Progress --- ## 1. Executive Summary [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: 2-3 sentences, disease claims must have T1-T4 grades --> ## 2. Target Identifiers [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: UniProt, Ensembl (versioned), Entrez, ChEMBL, HGNC, Symbol --> ## 3. Basic Information ### 3.1 Protein Description [Researching...] ### 3.2 Protein Function [Researching...] ### 3.3 Subcellular Localization [Researching...] ## 4. Structural Biology ### 4.1 Experimental Structures (PDB) [Researching...] <!-- METHOD: 3-step chain (UniProt xrefs → sequence search → domain search) --> ### 4.2 AlphaFold Prediction [Researching...] ### 4.3 Domain Architecture [Researching...] ### 4.4 Key Structural Features [Researching...] ## 5. Function & Pathways ### 5.1 Gene Ontology Annotations [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: Evidence codes mapped to T1-T4 --> ### 5.2 Pathway Involvement [Researching...] ## 6. Protein-Protein Interactions [Researching...] <!-- MINIMUM: ≥20 interactors OR explanation --> ## 7. Expression Profile ### 7.1 Tissue Expression (GTEx/HPA) [Researching...] <!-- NOTE: Use versioned Ensembl ID for GTEx if needed --> ### 7.2 Tissue Specificity [Researching...] <!-- MINIMUM: Top 10 tissues with TPM values --> ## 8. Genetic Variation & Disease ### 8.1 Constraint Scores [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: pLI, LOEUF, missense Z, pRec with interpretations --> ### 8.2 Disease Associations [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: Top 10 with OT scores; T1-T4 evidence grades --> ### 8.3 Clinical Variants (ClinVar) [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: Separate SNV and CNV tables --> ### 8.4 Mouse Model Phenotypes [Researching...] ## 9. Druggability & Pharmacology ### 9.1 Tractability Assessment [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: All modalities (SM, Ab, PROTAC, other) --> ### 9.2 Known Drugs [Researching...] ### 9.3 Chemical Probes [Researching...] <!-- NOTE: "No probes" is valid data - document explicitly --> ### 9.4 Clinical Pipeline [Researching...] ### 9.5 ChEMBL Bioactivity [Researching...] ## 10. Safety Profile ### 10.1 Safety Liabilities [Researching...] ### 10.2 Expression-Based Toxicity Risk [Researching...] ### 10.3 Mouse KO Phenotypes [Researching...] ## 11. Literature & Research Landscape ### 11.1 Publication Metrics [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: Total, 5y, 1y, drug-related, clinical --> ### 11.2 Research Trend [Researching...] ### 11.3 Key Publications [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: Table with PMID, title, year, evidence tier --> ### 11.4 Evidence Summary by Theme [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: T1-T4 breakdown per research theme --> ## 12. Competitive Landscape [Researching...] ## 13. Summary & Recommendations ### 13.1 Target Validation Scorecard [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: 6 criteria, 1-5 scores, evidence quality noted --> ### 13.2 Strengths [Researching...] ### 13.3 Challenges & Risks [Researching...] ### 13.4 Recommendations [Researching...] <!-- REQUIRED: ≥3 prioritized (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) --> ## 14. Data Sources & Methodology [Will be populated as research progresses...] ## 15. Data Gaps & Limitations [To be populated post-audit...]
| Tool | Parameter | Notes | |------|-----------|-------| | Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways | id | NOT uniprot_id | | ensembl_get_xrefs | id | NOT gene_id | | GTEx_get_median_gene_expression | gencode_id, operation | Try versioned ID if empty | | OpenTargets_* | ensemblId | camelCase, not ensemblID | | STRING_get_protein_interactions | protein_ids, species | List format for IDs | | intact_get_interactions | identifier | UniProt accession |
UniProt_get_entry_by_accession directlyUse this skill for comprehensive, multi-angle target analysis with guaranteed data completeness.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.