Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Extract exactly 8 context-sensitive keywords from Chinese, English, or mixed text and turn them into a distributed weighted Graph View with no center goal node. Use when Codex needs keyword extraction, blacklist filtering, co-occurrence edges, node definitions/notes, weighted graph JSON, or an online Graph View tool for text analysis.
.claude/skills/twhsi-keyword-graph-view/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 21% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -45% | 0% |
Create a centerless keyword network from raw text. The output should contain 8 keyword nodes, weighted undirected edges, and a short definition/note for every node.
https://keyword-graph-view.twhsi.chatgpt.site/ when the user wants an interactive Graph View.assets/web-app/ when the user wants to inspect, adapt, or redeploy the validated website source.Return graph JSON with this shape when the user asks for data or a reusable artifact:
json{ "meta": { "model": "keyword_graph_view", "keyword_count": 8, "layout": "distributed_weighted_network" }, "nodes": [ { "id": "k0", "label": "keyword", "count": 5, "score": 1, "weight": 9, "definition": "Context-specific definition", "note": "Longer note for side panel display", "evidence": ["source sentence"] } ], "edges": [ { "id": "e0", "source": "k0", "target": "k1", "weight": 7, "relation": "co_occurs" } ] }
W1) through blue, cyan, green, yellow, and orange to red (W9); increase line thickness with weight.Treat the blacklist as both phrase removal and token filtering. Default blacklist terms should include common structural words and Mandalart-center words such as:
text中心目標 主目標 main goal goal 中心 目標
Preserve the user's blacklist in the output metadata when useful.
Use scripts/extract_keyword_graph.py for deterministic text-to-graph JSON:
bashpython3 scripts/extract_keyword_graph.py input.txt --blacklist blacklist.txt --out graph.json
Patch the script only when the project needs a new schema or scoring behavior; otherwise prefer running it with options.
Run the bundled app locally only when interactive verification or customization is needed:
bashcd assets/web-app npm install npm run dev
Before publishing a modified app, run npm test and npm run lint.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 18,198 | 24,412 | +34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,487 | 3,934 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 18,379 | 17,409 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,363 | 4,084 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 26,295 | 18,610 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,004 | 4,639 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 16,872 | 20,263 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,501 | 4,973 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 4,517 | 3,350 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 773 | 1,348 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 11,709 | 11,446 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,397 | 3,245 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 6,915 | 2,720 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,112 | 1,320 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 3,691 | 1,659 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 644 | 1,131 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 7,451 | 2,448 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,193 | 1,280 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 15,093 | 2,925 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,479 | 1,367 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 14,275 | 6,728 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,166 | 2,179 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 18,049 | 13,585 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,672 | 3,122 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 11,215 | 3,640 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,581 | 1,462 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 11,533 | 3,866 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,645 | 1,478 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 8,340 | 1,761 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,216 | 1,129 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 18,335 | 8,904 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,874 | 2,210 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 4,489 | 2,223 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 734 | 1,245 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 14,573 | 3,060 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,209 | 1,376 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,589 | 7,600 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,981 | 2,028 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 16,152 | 6,925 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,210 | 1,896 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 10,100 | 1,270 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,404 | 1,061 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 13,478 | 6,738 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,306 | 2,008 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.