Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →vibeeval/differential-review
Security-focused differential code review with blast radius analysis, risk-adaptive depth (DEEP/FOCUSED/SURGICAL), git history correlation, and structured finding format. Adapted from Trail of Bits.
Passed 19 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 23 without it.
and 2 more in the full report
4 fixed15 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A PR modifies 450 lines of code across three microservices in a small repository. Should we perform a high-level diff-only review, or what depth level is appropriate for a change under 5,000 lines?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends line-by-line analysis of every changed file for small codebases. | Missed | Passed |
| Requires tracing control flow through changed paths. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Security-focused code review that adapts depth to codebase size and change risk. Goes beyond style -- finds vulnerabilities, logic errors, and blast radius.
Before reading any code:
# What changed?
git diff --stat <base>...<head>
# How much changed?
git diff --shortstat <base>...<head>
# Which files are security-sensitive?
git diff --name-only <base>...<head> | grep -iE '(auth|crypto|token|secret|permission|middleware|validator|sanitiz)'
Classify the change:
test cases passed, vs 15 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.