Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate a fact-checked academic personal homepage from a CV, optionally augmented by an existing manual homepage and an assets directory. Produces editable structured source files (profile.yml + publications.bib + bio.md + news.md) and a single-file HTML page. Uses Codex MCP for independent factual review against DBLP / arXiv. Optionally uses Gemini multimodal for screenshot critique when available. Use when the user says '做个学术主页', '从CV生成主页', 'aris-homepage', 'generate academic homepage from CV
.claude/skills/wanshuiyin-homepage-generator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1406% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 149% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 171% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 252% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 48% | 0% |
> The only personal-site generator that fact-checks your CV before publishing. > Cross-model adversarial review: the LLM that drafts your homepage never grades it. A deterministic Python pass checks your publication claims against DBLP on every render; an optional fresh Codex thread then reviews the prose and framing.
Generate a single-file HTML academic homepage. Optimized for PhD candidates, postdocs, and early-career researchers with public publications. v1 ships the theory-minimal persona (text-heavy academic page in the Zhxie / Avicenna lineage); active-researcher (paper thumbnails + news ticker variant) is planned.
Use when the user says 做个学术主页 · from CV generate homepage · aris-homepage · PhD personal site · GitHub Pages homepage.
Do NOT use for: portfolio sites needing image galleries; newsletter-funnel sites needing audience metrics; pure blog sites (use Jekyll/Hugo); tenured-faculty pages with student/teaching as top-level sections (use academicpages).
A real-world dogfood example: https://wanshuiyin.github.io/ — homepage generated by this skill from a CV + the maintainer's previous manual page. Use it as a style and capability reference; do not copy any names, affiliations, advisors, awards, paper titles, or filenames into your own examples or tests (see Privacy below).
> This repo ships no installer — there is no aris-homepage executable on any platform. Every invocation is python <path>/aris_homepage.py, and the path is relative to wherever you are standing (note the cd ./site below). On Windows also read WINDOWS_en.md / WINDOWS.md.
bash# Step 1 — bootstrap workspace from CV python tools/aris_homepage.py init --from-cv ./cv.pdf --out ./site cd ./site # Step 2 — calling LLM agent (Claude / your agent) reads .aris-homepage/EXTRACTION_HANDOFF.md, # then writes the extraction JSON to .aris-homepage/extraction.json. # This step is NOT automated by the CLI — it's a designed handoff so the agent # can use richer context (manual homepage URL, asset folder, your judgement). # Step 3 — persist the extracted JSON into editable source files # (we cd'd into ./site above, so the script is one level up now) python ../tools/aris_homepage.py finalize # Step 4 — review + tweak $EDITOR profile.yml publications.bib bio.md news.md EXTRACTION_REVIEW.md # Step 5 — render with fact-check (writes index.html + audit-report.md) python ../tools/aris_homepage.py render --persona theory-minimal
> Windows note. Beyond the invocation form above, Windows has its own traps: the python3 alias stub, silent .py file association, non-ASCII pdftotext paths, and the SSL certificate store. WINDOWS_en.md / WINDOWS.md walk through all of them.
The init CLI only handles the CV → text conversion. The other two inputs are consumed by the calling LLM agent when it fills extraction.json. Recommend supplying all three for best results:
| Input | How to supply | Purpose | |---|---|---| | CV | --from-cv cv.docx/pdf/txt on the CLI | The factual source — identity, education, jobs, publications, awards | | GitHub repos (v1.1) | --from-repos owner/repo,owner/repo2 on the CLI | The project-evidence source — stars / releases / topics / README per repo; merged into News + featured projects (issue #2) | | Manual homepage | Provide URL in the prompt; the agent uses WebFetch | The editorial source — section ordering, topic groupings, tone, link priorities, photo URL | | Assets directory | Provide path in the prompt; the agent inspects + copies into assets/ | The visual source — headshot, paper thumbnails, project logos |
Reconciliation rule: the CV is authoritative for facts (paper venues, dates, author lists), the manual homepage is authoritative for how you present yourself (what to group, what to surface, what voice), and the assets folder provides visuals. If the three sources conflict, do not silently merge — write the conflict to EXTRACTION_REVIEW.md for user resolution.
If you have no manual homepage yet: skip it. The generator falls back to CV-only structure with sensible academic defaults.
> Coming in v1.1: native CLI flags --manual-homepage URL and --assets-dir PATH will fetch + stage these inputs automatically. For v1, the calling agent handles them.
init and doctor run from anywhere; the paths below assume the repo root. finalize, render and check act on the site workspace — cd into it first, which is why the script is one level up in those lines.
bashpython tools/aris_homepage.py init --from-cv <file> [--from-repos owner/repo,...] [--include-private] [--out DIR] [--force|--merge] # Step 1. Extract CV to plain text (via textutil / python-docx / pdftotext). # Step 1b. (v1.1) If --from-repos given, snapshot each repo via `gh` CLI # (GraphQL metadata + REST README, truncated 20KB) → # .aris-homepage/github_repos.json. Private repos skipped unless # --include-private. # Step 2. Emit .aris-homepage/EXTRACTION_HANDOFF.md describing what the calling # LLM agent should write to .aris-homepage/extraction.json # (handoff doc auto-includes guidance on github_repos.json if present). # --force: backup *.bak-TIMESTAMP and overwrite. # --merge is parsed but not implemented — it exits with a clear message. # NOTE: --manual-homepage / --assets-dir do not exist yet; for now the # calling agent handles those sources via prompt context. python ../tools/aris_homepage.py finalize # or from elsewhere: --out DIR # Ingest .aris-homepage/extraction.json → profile.yml + publications.bib + # bio.md + news.md + EXTRACTION_REVIEW.md. python ../tools/aris_homepage.py render --persona theory-minimal [--out index.html] [--override-all] [--no-audit] [--offline] # Run fact-check (unless --no-audit) and render. Hard-fail blocks ship unless # --override-all (loudly logged in audit-report.md). python ../tools/aris_homepage.py check [--strict] # Fact-check only; updates audit-report.md. --strict treats WARN as FAIL. python tools/aris_homepage.py doctor # Environment + dependency diagnostic (Python, pyyaml, textutil, DBLP reachability).
After finalize, your working dir contains these editable files. Edit them in your IDE; they are the source of truth — re-run render after each change.
| File | Role | |---|---| | profile.yml | Structured facts: identity, affiliations, education, research, links, awards, talks, teaching, featured projects, publication metadata, audit overrides | | publications.bib | BibTeX entries — paper truth source | | bio.md | 1-3 paragraph self-introduction in Markdown | | news.md | Reverse-chronological news bullets; supports inline <img> for embedded badges | | assets/ | Optional local images (photo, paper thumbnails) — remote https:// URLs also accepted in profile.yml | | EXTRACTION_REVIEW.md | LLM extraction confidence flags — read this before the first render | | .aris-homepage/ | Internal cache (DBLP responses, extraction handoff JSON); safe to delete | | audit-report.md | Generated by render / check — your evidence trail |
profile.yml has many optional fields; the complete reference lives in PROFILE_SCHEMA.md in this skill directory. Keep that as the single source of truth for fields.
Core schema groups (read PROFILE_SCHEMA.md for the exact field shapes):
identity: name, name_native (bilingual), title, email, wechat, office, photo (local path or remote URL)affiliations: current + past arrays with role / institution / department / start / endeducation · research (summary + interests) · links (scholar / github / dblp / orcid / etc.)featured_projects: first-class section for flagship OSS work — logo, stats grid, link cluster, sub-projects, open problemsawards · talks · teaching · blogs_tutorials (rendered combined with talks)professional_services: conference reviewer / journal reviewer / editorial board listselected_publications: flat list OR ordered topic groups ([{group: "Topic Title", keys: [bibkey1, ...]}])publications: preamble (intro sentence before first H3)publications_meta.<bibkey>: thumbnail, description (blue blurb box), awards (list of badges), co_first (equal-contribution markers), links (arXiv / paper / code / slides / openreview / etc. — any key supported)audit.overrides.<bibkey>: per-paper bypass — any non-empty, unexpired object skips that paper's DBLP checks. reason is recorded, not enforced; expires: YYYY-MM-DD becomes a hard failure once pastship: persona, accent_color, lang, awards_heading (override "Awards" → custom string)Runs automatically during every render (unless --no-audit). Three outcomes per claim:
| Outcome | Trigger | Effect | |---|---|---| | PASS | Title hits DBLP and nothing below fires. Year and venue are only compared when both the BibTeX entry and the DBLP hit carry them | Listed under ## ✅ Verified in audit-report | | WARN (soft) | DBLP returns 0 hits OR ≥2 ambiguous; entry has an arXiv eprint but no DBLP record; BibTeX entry has no title | Render proceeds; logged in audit-report | | FAIL (hard) | DBLP venue ≠ the BibTeX booktitle/journal; year mismatch; a best paper / spotlight / oral / outstanding badge with no arxiv/paper/pdf/project/openreview link; bibkey in selected_publications missing from publications.bib; expired override | Verdict = BLOCKED and render exits without writing the HTML; audit-report.md is still written. --override-all to ship anyway |
Override two-layer:
audit.overrides.<bibkey> — any non-empty, unexpired override object skips the DBLP checks for that paper entirely (it is not enforced per-field). reason: is recorded in the report but not required; expires: is, once past, a hard failurepython ../tools/aris_homepage.py render --override-all (every override loudly logged)Honest scope of fact-check: DBLP lookups cover only the papers listed in selected_publications; the award-badge sweep covers every entry in publications_meta. It catches venue/year mismatch and award badges asserted without a link. It does not check author lists at all, and it never compares the title DBLP returned — the title is only the search query. Does NOT verify: workshop papers without DBLP entries, industry tech reports, blog/talk content, OSS star counts, or arbitrary claims in the bio. Treat the audit as a diagnostic floor, not a guarantee.
Two distinct review layers; do not confuse them:
Layer 1 — automated factual audit (default; skipped only with --no-audit) render and check run a deterministic Python pipeline that queries DBLP (with a 4-attempt backoff + local cache at .aris-homepage/dblp-cache.json). Nothing queries arXiv: a DBLP miss is a WARN either way, and an eprint / archiveprefix field already in your BibTeX only changes how that warning is labelled. No external LLM needed. This is the floor of fact-check, and it works with zero AI-runtime dependencies beyond Python + the calling shell.
Layer 2 — optional adversarial LLM review (recommended for high-stakes) If the calling agent has access to Codex MCP (mcp__codex__codex), run a fresh-thread Codex review after render to scrutinize: bio prose tone, claim phrasing, sub-project list, schema consistency. Codex acts as the cross-family reviewer (ARIS's adversarial-review invariant).
If the calling agent has access to Gemini (mcp__gemini__analyzeFile or mcp__gemini-cli__ask-gemini with model: auto-gemini-3), additionally use it to critique a Chrome-headless screenshot of the rendered HTML for visual issues (layout collisions, font sizes, image proportions).
Minimum required runtime: Python + the calling shell. The skill renders + fact-checks fully without Codex or Gemini. Codex strengthens the review; Gemini adds visual-design feedback. Neither is required to generate or ship the homepage.
| Runtime | What you get | |---|---| | Python only | Layer-1 DBLP fact-check; full render | | + Codex MCP | + Adversarial LLM review of prose / claims / schema | | + Gemini multimodal | + Visual-design critique of rendered screenshot |
┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐
cv.{pdf,docx} ─►│ Step 1: extract → cv.txt │
│ Step 1b: if --manual-homepage, WebFetch │
│ Step 1c: if --assets-dir, link to workspace│
└─────────────────┬──────────────────────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Step 2: LLM agent fills extraction.json │
│ (JSON-schema-constrained output) │
└─────────────────┬────────────────────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Step 3: aris_homepage.py finalize │
│ → profile.yml + publications.bib │
│ + bio.md + news.md + EXTRACTION_REVIEW │
└─────────────────┬────────────────────────┘
│
✋ USER EDITS IN IDE ✋
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Step 4: render (with Layer-1 DBLP audit) │
│ ↳ Python DBLP fact-check │
│ ↳ Python builds per-section HTML │
│ ↳ inject into homepage-<persona>.html │
│ ↳ (optional) Codex MCP adversarial pass│
│ ↳ (optional) Gemini screenshot critique│
└─────────────────┬────────────────────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ index.html + audit-report.md │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘pyyaml (pip install pyyaml, may need --break-system-packages on modern macOS)bibtexparser dependencytextutil on macOS (bundled) OR python-docx (pip install python-docx)pdftotext (install via brew install poppler / apt install poppler-utils)https://dblp.org/search/publ/api (rate-limited 4-attempt backoff + local cache in .aris-homepage/dblp-cache.json)python tools/aris_homepage.py doctor checks all of the above.
All examples in this skill must be generic unless explicitly marked as the public demo URL (wanshuiyin.github.io).
Never include in examples, schema docs, or tests:
/Users/..., ~/...)Use placeholders:
Dr. Example Researcher · Jane DoeExample University · Department of CScv.pdf · assets/photo.jpghttps://example.github.io/example2026paper (bibkey)advisor@example.eduThe public demo at wanshuiyin.github.io is the only exception — it's an authorized, named real-world example of generator output, not a source to copy data from.
python tools/aris_homepage.py init --from-cv produces editable scaffolding from any user's CV (single-file .docx or .pdf).python ../tools/aris_homepage.py render --persona theory-minimal (from the site workspace) produces a single HTML file ≤500KB (no images) or ≤2MB (with photo + thumbnails inline), or smaller still when images are referenced via remote URLs.python tools/aris_homepage.py doctor accurately reports environment readiness.active-researcher template (placeholder exists; theory-minimal is the only fully-shipping persona)lang: bilingual)--manual-homepage editorial-extraction helpers (currently the calling LLM agent reads the fetched HTML and reconciles)skills/interview-cheatsheet/SKILL.md — sister skill for ML interview cheat sheets (shared cross-model review pattern)skills/render-html/SKILL.md — Markdown → single-file HTML primitivetools/aris_homepage.py — implementationtools/templates/homepage-theory-minimal.html — templatePROFILE_SCHEMA.md (sibling file) — complete schema reference| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 7,047 | 7,577 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 397 | 5,979 | +1406% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 10,219 | 3,799 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,752 | 5,069 | +189% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 12,195 | 6,850 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,995 | 5,050 | +153% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 12,718 | 7,785 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,887 | 5,796 | +207% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 17,308 | 5,394 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,575 | 5,399 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 14,764 | 6,582 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,491 | 5,681 | +128% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 22,823 | 39,166 | +72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,122 | 5,278 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 12,625 | 5,288 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,052 | 5,552 | +171% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 10,751 | 5,710 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,568 | 5,527 | +252% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 22,971 | 5,377 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,754 | 5,546 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 16,413 | 3,164 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,403 | 5,128 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,469 | 6,713 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,333 | 5,750 | +146% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 17,864 | 4,377 | -75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,881 | 5,387 | +87% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 14,491 | 4,157 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,079 | 5,250 | +153% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 11,118 | 4,220 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,011 | 5,328 | +165% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 12,056 | 3,586 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,227 | 5,251 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 21,688 | 9,623 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,389 | 6,284 | +85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 10,598 | 6,931 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,605 | 5,812 | +262% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 10,109 | 5,262 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,584 | 5,493 | +247% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 12,572 | 3,598 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,921 | 5,123 | +167% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 14,370 | 5,933 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,386 | 5,588 | +134% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 9,878 | 6,923 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,454 | 5,829 | +301% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 18,046 | 3,295 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,977 | 5,161 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | fail→pass | 12,546 | 3,130 | -75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,083 | 5,075 | +144% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 15,263 | 7,207 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,535 | 5,886 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-26 | pass→pass | 10,386 | 4,509 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,570 | 5,340 | +240% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-27 | fail→pass | 13,673 | 5,153 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,417 | 5,495 | +127% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-28 | fail→pass | 15,204 | 2,335 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,115 | 4,941 | +134% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 28 cases were attempted, and 26 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +61 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 26 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/21/2026 | +68% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.