Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →wasabeef/多角色辯論探討權衡方案
多角色辯論探討權衡方案。「角色間討論」「探討權衡」「從不同角度討論」等觸發。
Passed 15 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 22 without it.
2 fixed17 passed either way2 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our team is deciding on JWT access token expiration duration for a mobile banking API. Security wants ultra-short expiration to minimize leakage windows, while Performance wants longer expiration to reduce token refresh backend traffic. Generate a 2-role debate using Security and Performance roles, covering initial stances, mutual rebuttals, compromise exploration, and a phased rollout conclusion.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes a Security position citing OWASP guidelines for token lifecycle management. | Missed | Passed |
| Includes a Performance rebuttal proposing refresh token mechanisms. | Passed | Passed |
| Specifies a compromise solution containing a phased rollout roadmap. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
不同專業角色進行辩論，考虑權衡取舍並導出最優解的命令。
/role-debate <角色 1>,<角色 2> [議題]
/role-debate <角色 1>,<角色 2>,<角色 3> [議題]
# 安全性 vs 性能的權衡
/role-debate security,performance
"關于 JWT 令牌的有效期設置"
# 可用性 vs 安全性的平衡
/role-debate frontend,security
"關于雙因素認證的 UX 優化"
# 技術選型的辩論
/role-debate architect,mobile
"關于 React Native vs Flutter 的選擇"
# 三方辩論
/role-debate architect,security,performance
"關于微服務化的必要性"
test cases passed, vs 15 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.