Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate and validate Kubernetes YAML manifests with best practices for Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, and security policies.
.claude/skills/williamzujkowski-kubernetes-manifest-generator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 52% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 432% | 0% |
Trigger conditions:
Not for:
Time normalization:
NOW_ET using NIST/time.gov semantics (America/New_York, ISO-8601): 2025-10-26T01:33:54-04:00NOW_ET for all citation access datesInput validation:
workload_name must be DNS-1123 compliant (lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens)workload_type must be one of: deployment, statefulset, daemonset, job, cronjobcontainer_image must include tag (not :latest for production)replicas must be ≥1 (≥3 recommended for production)resources.requests must be ≤ resources.limits if both specifiedSource freshness:
Decision thresholds:
Step 1: Generate core Kubernetes manifests
Step 2: Validate and output
Abort conditions:
All T1 steps plus:
Step 1: Add health checks
Step 2: Apply security hardening
Step 3: Add resource management
Step 4: Network security
Step 5: Validate and report
Abort conditions:
All T1 + T2 steps plus:
Step 1: Advanced workload features
Step 2: Complete GitOps structure
Output:
Workload type selection:
Resource sizing defaults:
Health check defaults:
Ambiguity handling:
Required fields (all tiers):
yamlkubernetes_manifests: deployment: "Deployment YAML with metadata, spec, containers" service: "Service YAML (if port specified)" validation_results: syntax_valid: boolean kubectl_dry_run: "command output or error" best_practices_report: checks_passed: integer checks_failed: integer recommendations: ["array of improvement suggestions"]
Additional T2 fields:
yamlsecurity_config: service_account: "ServiceAccount YAML" rbac_role: "Role or ClusterRole YAML" rbac_binding: "RoleBinding YAML" network_policy: "NetworkPolicy YAML" pod_security_standard: "restricted | baseline | privileged" autoscaling: hpa: "HorizontalPodAutoscaler YAML (if applicable)" metrics: ["cpu", "memory", "custom"]
Additional T3 fields:
yamladvanced_features: pvc: "PersistentVolumeClaim YAML (if StatefulSet)" pdb: "PodDisruptionBudget YAML" affinity_rules: "Pod affinity configuration" gitops_structure: kustomization: "Kustomization.yaml for base" namespace: "Namespace YAML with ResourceQuota" service_monitor: "Prometheus ServiceMonitor CRD (if applicable)"
yaml# T1 Example: Basic Deployment apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: web-api labels: app: web-api version: v1.0.0 spec: replicas: 3 selector: matchLabels: app: web-api template: metadata: labels: app: web-api spec: containers: - name: api image: myregistry/web-api:1.0.0 ports: - containerPort: 8080 resources: requests: {cpu: 100m, memory: 128Mi} limits: {cpu: 200m, memory: 256Mi}
(Service manifest generated alongside Deployment)
Token budgets (enforced):
Safety checks:
Auditability:
Determinism:
Validation requirements:
kubectl apply --dry-run=client -f -Official Documentation (accessed 2025-10-26T01:33:54-04:00):
Validation Tools:
Best Practices:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-11 | pass→pass | 4,688 | 5,707 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 978 | 3,765 | +285% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 11,956 | 8,187 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,049 | 4,640 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 20,017 | 12,033 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,685 | 5,466 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 23,005 | 15,614 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,005 | 6,508 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 20,790 | 12,375 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,884 | 5,524 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 9,664 | 9,270 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,210 | 4,606 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 21,503 | 22,244 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,356 | 7,425 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,369 | 14,646 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,186 | 5,927 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 7,068 | 9,016 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,669 | 4,685 | +181% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 12,120 | 11,891 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,611 | 5,397 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 6,944 | 9,178 | +32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,263 | 4,366 | +246% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 3,069 | 6,150 | +100% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 703 | 3,738 | +432% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 12,546 | 14,426 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,598 | 5,566 | +114% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 10,383 | 12,664 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,091 | 5,473 | +162% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 13,410 | 12,449 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,799 | 5,381 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 8,972 | 5,457 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,564 | 3,464 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 3,896 | 4,164 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 662 | 3,339 | +404% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 18,987 | 18,564 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,092 | 7,129 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,134 | 16,045 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,099 | 6,518 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 3,047 | 7,619 | +150% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 577 | 4,098 | +610% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 3,565 | 5,267 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 688 | 3,534 | +414% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 12,975 | 5,862 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,522 | 3,693 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.