Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Multi-route literature expansion + metadata normalization for evidence-first surveys. **Trigger**: evidence collector, literature engineer, 文献扩充, 多路召回, snowballing, cited by, references, 元信息增强, provenance. **Use when**: Workflow 需要按锁定的 retrieval policy 扩充候选文献并补齐可追溯 metadata。
.claude/skills/willoscar-literature-engineer/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 18% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 47% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -31% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 40% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 38% | 0% |
Goal: build a large, verifiable candidate pool for downstream dedupe/rank, mapping, notes, citations, and drafting.
This skill is intentionally evidence-first: if you can't reach the target size with verifiable IDs/provenance, the correct behavior is to block and ask for more exports / enable network, not to fabricate.
Always read:
references/domain_pack_overview.md — how domain packs drive topic-specific behaviorDomain packs (loaded by topic match):
assets/domain_packs/llm_agents.json — pinned classic/survey arXiv IDs for LLM agent topicsUse scripts/run.py only for:
Do not treat run.py as the place for:
queries.mdkeywords, exclude, max_results, time windowpapers/import.(csv|json|jsonl|bib)papers/arxiv_export.(csv|json|jsonl|bib)papers/imports/*.(csv|json|jsonl|bib)papers/snowball/*.(csv|json|jsonl|bib)papers/papers_raw.jsonltitle (str), authors (liststr]), year (int|""), url (str)arxiv_id and/or doiabstract (str; may be empty in offline mode)source (str) + provenance (listdict])papers/papers_raw.csv (human scan)papers/retrieval_report.md (route counts, missing-meta stats, next actions)provenance.retrieval_policy.minimum_records, use that value; survey profiles may instead derive a stricter pool target from core_size.arxiv_id or doi, plus url).uv run python .codex/skills/literature-engineer/scripts/run.py --helpuv run python .codex/skills/literature-engineer/scripts/run.py --help.queries.md.papers/import.(csv|json|jsonl|bib), papers/arxiv_export.(csv|json|jsonl|bib), papers/imports/*.(csv|json|jsonl|bib).papers/snowball/*.(csv|json|jsonl|bib).--online and/or --snowball.ref.bib can include must-cite anchors even when keyword search misses them.r.jina.ai proxy so the pipeline can still self-boot without manual exports.0 records due to transient network errors, a simple rerun is often sufficient (the pipeline should not fabricate).papers/imports/ then run:uv run python .codex/skills/literature-engineer/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>uv run python .codex/skills/literature-engineer/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace> --input path/to/a.bib --input path/to/b.jsonluv run python .codex/skills/literature-engineer/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace> --onlineuv run python .codex/skills/literature-engineer/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace> --snowballSymptom:
papers/papers_raw.jsonl is below the explicit or profile-derived minimum declared by the locked Workflow.Causes:
Solutions:
papers/imports/ (multiple routes/queries).papers/snowball/.--online --snowball.Symptom:
arxiv_id and doi.Solutions:
--online to backfill arXiv IDs.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | 3,961 | 5,490 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 256 | 1,817 | +610% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 27,289 | 5,114 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,211 | 1,733 | -72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 4,461 | 4,973 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 273 | 1,792 | +556% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 22,534 | 19,538 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,709 | 4,857 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 13,827 | 23,210 | +68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,984 | 6,328 | +112% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 19,450 | 5,602 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,282 | 1,718 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,459 | 4,829 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,993 | 2,357 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 14,663 | 4,286 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,349 | 2,317 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 10,928 | 5,014 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,568 | 2,311 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,740 | 3,574 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,604 | 2,088 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 16,102 | 2,021 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,546 | 1,749 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,736 | 5,021 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,411 | 2,514 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 13,156 | 6,418 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,209 | 2,856 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 7,674 | 1,262 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,169 | 1,642 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 9,226 | 2,661 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,486 | 2,049 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 18,852 | 2,743 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 925 | 1,830 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,245 | 1,597 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,447 | 1,686 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 13,249 | 1,665 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,151 | 1,724 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 13,063 | 6,318 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,987 | 2,362 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,250 | 2,318 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,941 | 1,785 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 7,758 | 2,673 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,353 | 1,862 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 7,015 | 1,806 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,254 | 1,736 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 17 counted toward the lift figure. The other 5 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +45 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 17 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.