Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →wondelai/37signals-way
Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from "Getting Real", "Rework", and "Shape Up".
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
10 fixed11 passed either way0 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
The product team for the ShopEase e-commerce platform maintains a backlog of 450 Jira tickets, including feature ideas, user feedback, and enhancements. The team lead wants to set up a bi-weekly grooming session to categorize, score, and re-order these tickets. Recommend how the team should manage this backlog.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends abolishing the persistent backlog entirely. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A system for building profitable software without bloat, bureaucracy, or burnout, distilled from three books: Getting Real (build less), Rework (say no by default), and Shape Up (fix time, flex scope). Use it to shape work, bet on six-week cycles, run small autonomous teams, and ship on a predictable cadence.
Build less. The best products do fewer things exceptionally well — simplicity is the destination, not the starting point. Traditional development adds; the 37signals way subtracts: build half a product (not a half-assed product), say no by default, fix the time and flex the scope. Constraints are what make great work possible — six weeks, three people, and a shaped pitch force you to find the essential version.
Goal: 10/10. Rate product plans, feature scopes, and team processes 0-10 against these principles. Report the current score and the specific changes needed to reach 10/10.
Core concept: Win through deliberate omission — fewer features, fewer preferences, fewer moving parts, each done better than competitors do theirs. Build software you need yourself and solve problems you understand deeply.
Why it works: Every feature carries maintenance, cognitive, and opportunity costs forever, usually for a fraction of users. Building less keeps the product focused, the codebase manageable, and the team small.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Feature prioritization | Default answer is no | Reporting dashboard requested → ship CSV export covering 90% of use cases |
| MVP scoping | Cut until it hurts, then cut more | Drop user accounts for v1; use email magic links |
| Competitive strategy | Underdo, don't outdo | Competitor has 50 integrations; ship 3 that work flawlessly |
See references/build-less.md when deciding what to cut — curation tactics, the constraints-as-feature argument, and worked scope-cut examples.
test cases passed, vs 12 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.