Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Multi-CLI collaborative planning with codebase context gathering, iterative cross-verification, and execution handoff.
.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
When workflowPreferences.autoYes is true: Auto-approve plan, use recommended solution and execution method (Agent, Skip review).
Context Source: ACE semantic search + Multi-CLI analysis Output Directory: .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/ Default Max Rounds: 3 (convergence may complete earlier) CLI Tools: @cli-discuss-agent (analysis), @cli-lite-planning-agent (plan generation) Execution: Auto-hands off to workflow-lite-execute after plan approval
Phase 1: Context Gathering
└─ ACE semantic search, extract keywords, build context package
Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion (Iterative, via @cli-discuss-agent)
├─ Round N: Agent executes Gemini + Codex + Claude
├─ Cross-verify findings, synthesize solutions
├─ Write synthesis.json to rounds/{N}/
└─ Loop until convergence or max rounds
Phase 3: Present Options
└─ Display solutions with trade-offs from agent output
Phase 4: User Decision
├─ Select solution approach
├─ Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
├─ Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Codex/Agent)
└─ Route:
├─ Approve → Phase 5
├─ Need More Analysis → Return to Phase 2
└─ Cancel → Save session
Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff
├─ Generate plan.json + .task/*.json (via @cli-lite-planning-agent, two-layer output)
├─ Build executionContext with user selections and taskFiles
└─ Execute via workflow-lite-execute| Agent | Responsibility | |-------|---------------| | Orchestrator | Session management, ACE context, user decisions, phase transitions, executionContext assembly | | @cli-discuss-agent | Multi-CLI execution (Gemini/Codex/Claude), cross-verification, solution synthesis, synthesis.json output | | @cli-lite-planning-agent | Task decomposition, two-layer output: plan.json (overview with task_ids]) + .task/.json (task files) |
Session Initialization:
javascriptconst sessionId = `MCP-${taskSlug}-${date}` const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/${sessionId}` Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/rounds`)
ACE Context Queries:
javascriptconst aceQueries = [ `Project architecture related to ${keywords}`, `Existing implementations of ${keywords[0]}`, `Code patterns for ${keywords} features`, `Integration points for ${keywords[0]}` ] // Execute via mcp__ace-tool__search_context
Context Package (passed to agent):
relevant_files[] - Files identified by ACEdetected_patterns[] - Code patterns foundarchitecture_insights - Structure understandingCore Principle: Orchestrator only delegates and reads output — NO direct CLI execution. CLI calls MUST use Bash with run_in_background: true, wait for hook callback, do NOT use TaskOutput polling.
Agent Invocation:
javascriptAgent({ subagent_type: "cli-discuss-agent", run_in_background: false, description: `Discussion round ${currentRound}`, prompt: ` ## Input Context - task_description: ${taskDescription} - round_number: ${currentRound} - session: { id: "${sessionId}", folder: "${sessionFolder}" } - ace_context: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage)} - previous_rounds: ${JSON.stringify(analysisResults)} - user_feedback: ${userFeedback || 'None'} - cli_config: { tools: ["gemini", "codex"], mode: "parallel", fallback_chain: ["gemini", "codex", "claude"] } ## Execution Process 1. Parse input context (handle JSON strings) 2. Check if ACE supplementary search needed 3. Build CLI prompts with context 4. Execute CLIs (parallel or serial per cli_config.mode) 5. Parse CLI outputs, handle failures with fallback 6. Perform cross-verification between CLI results 7. Synthesize solutions, calculate scores 8. Calculate convergence, generate clarification questions 9. Write synthesis.json ## Output Write: ${sessionFolder}/rounds/${currentRound}/synthesis.json ## Completion Checklist - [ ] All configured CLI tools executed (or fallback triggered) - [ ] Cross-verification completed with agreements/disagreements - [ ] 2-3 solutions generated with file:line references - [ ] Convergence score calculated (0.0-1.0) - [ ] synthesis.json written with all Primary Fields ` })
Read Agent Output:
javascriptconst synthesis = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/rounds/${round}/synthesis.json`)) // Access top-level fields: solutions, convergence, cross_verification, clarification_questions
Convergence Decision:
javascriptif (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'converged') { // Proceed to Phase 3 } else if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'user_input_needed') { // Collect user feedback, return to Phase 2 } else { // Continue to next round if new_insights && round < maxRounds }
Display solutions from synthesis.solutions[] showing: name, source CLIs, effort/risk, pros/cons, affected files (file:line). Also show cross-verification agreements/disagreements count.
javascriptAskUserQuestion({ questions: [ { question: "Which solution approach?", header: "Solution", multiSelect: false, options: solutions.map((s, i) => ({ label: `Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}`, description: `${s.effort} effort, ${s.risk} risk` })).concat([ { label: "Need More Analysis", description: "Return to Phase 2" } ]) }, { question: "Execution method:", header: "Execution", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" }, { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" }, { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" } ] }, { question: "Code review after execution?", header: "Review", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Skip", description: "No review" }, { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" }, { label: "Codex Review", description: "Codex CLI: prompt-based code quality review (--mode analysis)" }, { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" } ] } ] })
Routing:
TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 Decision):
javascriptconst executionLabel = userSelection.execution_method // "Agent" / "Codex" / "Auto" TodoWrite({ todos: [ { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "completed", activeForm: "Gathering context" }, { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Running discussion" }, { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "completed", activeForm: "Presenting options" }, { content: `Phase 4: User Decision [${executionLabel}]`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Decision recorded" }, { content: `Phase 5: Plan Generation [${executionLabel}]`, status: "in_progress", activeForm: `Generating plan [${executionLabel}]` } ]})
Step 1: Build Context-Package (Orchestrator responsibility):
javascriptconst contextPackage = { solution: { name: selectedSolution.name, source_cli: selectedSolution.source_cli, feasibility: selectedSolution.feasibility, effort: selectedSolution.effort, risk: selectedSolution.risk, summary: selectedSolution.summary }, implementation_plan: selectedSolution.implementation_plan, dependencies: selectedSolution.dependencies || { internal: [], external: [] }, technical_concerns: selectedSolution.technical_concerns || [], consensus: { agreements: synthesis.cross_verification.agreements, resolved_conflicts: synthesis.cross_verification.resolution }, constraints: userConstraints || [], task_description: taskDescription, session_id: sessionId } Write(`${sessionFolder}/context-package.json`, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2))
Step 2: Invoke Planning Agent:
javascriptAgent({ subagent_type: "cli-lite-planning-agent", run_in_background: false, description: "Generate implementation plan", prompt: ` ## Schema Reference Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/task-schema.json ## Output Format: Two-Layer Structure - plan.json: Overview with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files (NO tasks[] array) - .task/TASK-*.json: Independent task files following task-schema.json plan.json required: summary, approach, task_ids, task_count, _metadata (with plan_type) Task files required: id, title, description, depends_on, convergence (with criteria[]) Task fields: files[].change (not modification_points), convergence.criteria (not acceptance), test (not verification) ## Context-Package (from orchestrator) ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)} ## Execution Process 1. Read plan-overview-base-schema.json + task-schema.json for output structure 2. Read project-tech.json and specs/*.md 3. Parse context-package fields: - solution: name, feasibility, summary - implementation_plan: tasks[], execution_flow, milestones - dependencies: internal[], external[] - technical_concerns: risks/blockers - consensus: agreements, resolved_conflicts - constraints: user requirements 4. Use implementation_plan.tasks[] as task foundation 5. Preserve task dependencies (depends_on) and execution_flow 6. Expand tasks with convergence.criteria (testable completion conditions) 7. Create .task/ directory and write individual TASK-*.json files 8. Generate plan.json with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files ## Output - ${sessionFolder}/plan.json (overview with task_ids[]) - ${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-*.json (independent task files) ## Completion Checklist - [ ] plan.json has task_ids[] and task_count (NO embedded tasks[]) - [ ] .task/*.json files preserve task dependencies from implementation_plan - [ ] Task execution order follows execution_flow - [ ] Key_points reflected in task descriptions - [ ] User constraints applied to implementation - [ ] convergence.criteria are testable - [ ] plan.json follows plan-overview-base-schema.json - [ ] Task files follow task-schema.json ` })
Step 3: Build executionContext:
javascriptconst plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`)) const taskFiles = plan.task_ids.map(id => `${sessionFolder}/.task/${id}.json`) // Build executionContext (same structure as lite-plan) executionContext = { planObject: plan, taskFiles: taskFiles, // Paths to .task/*.json files (two-layer format) explorationsContext: null, // Multi-CLI doesn't use exploration files explorationAngles: [], explorationManifest: null, clarificationContext: null, // Store user feedback from Phase 2 if exists executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method, // From Phase 4 codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool, // From Phase 4 originalUserInput: taskDescription, executorAssignments: null, session: { id: sessionId, folder: sessionFolder, artifacts: { explorations: [], // No explorations in multi-CLI workflow explorations_manifest: null, plan: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`, task_dir: plan.task_ids ? `${sessionFolder}/.task/` : null, synthesis_rounds: Array.from({length: currentRound}, (_, i) => `${sessionFolder}/rounds/${i+1}/synthesis.json` ), context_package: `${sessionFolder}/context-package.json` } } }
Step 4: Hand off to Execution:
javascriptSkill({ skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory" }) // executionContext is passed via global variable to workflow-lite-execute (Mode 1: In-Memory Plan)
json{ "round": 1, "solutions": [{ "name": "Solution Name", "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"], "feasibility": 0.85, "effort": "low|medium|high", "risk": "low|medium|high", "summary": "Brief analysis summary", "implementation_plan": { "approach": "High-level technical approach", "tasks": [ {"id": "T1", "name": "Task", "depends_on": [], "files": [], "key_point": "..."} ], "execution_flow": "T1 → T2 → T3", "milestones": ["Checkpoint 1", "Checkpoint 2"] }, "dependencies": {"internal": [], "external": []}, "technical_concerns": ["Risk 1", "Blocker 2"] }], "convergence": { "score": 0.85, "new_insights": false, "recommendation": "converged|continue|user_input_needed" }, "cross_verification": { "agreements": [], "disagreements": [], "resolution": "..." }, "clarification_questions": [] }
Initialization (Phase 1 start):
javascriptTodoWrite({ todos: [ { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Gathering context" }, { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running discussion" }, { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "pending", activeForm: "Presenting options" }, { content: "Phase 4: User Decision", status: "pending", activeForm: "Awaiting decision" }, { content: "Phase 5: Plan Generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating plan" } ]})
.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{MCP-task-slug-YYYY-MM-DD}/
├── session-state.json # Session tracking (orchestrator)
├── rounds/
│ ├── 1/synthesis.json # Round 1 analysis (cli-discuss-agent)
│ ├── 2/synthesis.json # Round 2 analysis (cli-discuss-agent)
│ └── .../
├── context-package.json # Extracted context for planning (orchestrator)
├── plan.json # Plan overview with task_ids[] (NO embedded tasks[])
└── .task/ # Independent task files
├── TASK-001.json # Task file following task-schema.json
├── TASK-002.json
└── ...| Error | Resolution | |-------|------------| | ACE search fails | Fall back to Glob/Grep for file discovery | | Agent fails | Retry once, then present partial results | | CLI timeout (in agent) | Agent uses fallback: gemini → codex → claude | | No convergence | Present best options, flag uncertainty | | synthesis.json parse error | Request agent retry | | User cancels | Save session for later resumption |
| Flag | Default | Description | |------|---------|-------------| | --max-rounds | 3 | Maximum discussion rounds | | --tools | gemini,codex | CLI tools for analysis | | --mode | parallel | Execution mode: parallel or serial | | --auto-execute | false | Auto-execute after approval |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.