▸case-01 I've just finished generating a client presentation deck using our automated slide builder, and I need a complete pre-delivery verification audit. Please review the PPTX file alongside its spec and source files to verify visual bounds, structural layout, and accessibility features. Provide a comprehensive QA report detailing any layout collisions, text overflows, accessibility gaps, or package errors, along with formatted exception details for any items that require sign-off. | fail→pass | 25,902 | 24,595 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,716 | 4,994 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 Before we publish this presentation package to the team drive, run our quality gate protocol on the output slide deck and its manifest. Check that the document language, slide headers, image alt text, reading order, and element alignment meet our standards. Give me a status summary showing whether all quality gates passed, along with a confirmation of all required audit artifacts. | fail→fail | 69,020 | 11,327 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,891 | 2,652 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 We encountered formatting issues in our latest slide build. Please conduct a full quality verification review against the presentation, underlying layout tree, and source references. Identify any geometry flaws or clipping that require builder spec repairs, guide the re-verification process, and return an audit breakdown listing slide-level findings and any documented exceptions. | fail→pass | 20,412 | 27,488 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,040 | 6,105 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 We are preparing to run our automated PowerPoint generation pipeline for a quarterly earnings deck. Before invoking python-pptx to generate the presentation files, we want to perform pre-generation checks on our layout JSON coordinate definitions. What step should be performed on the layout contract before running the build process? | fail→pass | 12,166 | 3,909 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,284 | 1,023 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 We need to validate the internal OpenXML package structure and integrity of a newly generated production PowerPoint deck before sending it to executive reviewers. Which validation tool and report format should be executed for production slide packages? | fail→pass | 12,215 | 2,404 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,487 | 728 | -71% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 During QA of a generated deck, our automated test environment does not currently have a slide rendering engine installed to generate preview PNGs. The test engineer proposed adding a renderer tool like soffice to the container dependencies so we can visually check for font fallback and clipping. How should this renderer dependency request be handled? | fail→pass | 15,954 | 4,079 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,212 | 1,104 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 When validating our generated pitch deck, the layout validation check flagged a text overflow on Slide 4 where text exceeds the frame boundary. The build engineer suggested marking this collision as a documented exception in the sign-off sheet to proceed with delivery. How should deterministic layout failures be handled? | pass→pass | 10,574 | 5,999 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,998 | 1,491 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 To prevent visual layout discrepancies across different PowerPoint client versions, our builder developer suggests rasterizing key content slides into high-resolution PNG images and inserting those images into the PPTX slides instead of native text frames and shape objects. Is this design approach acceptable for deliverable decks? | pass→pass | 12,217 | 7,337 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,088 | 1,624 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 An automated presentation generation job completed, and we are archiving the delivery bundle. The archiving script currently packages the final PPTX, the spec, and the build record. Which additional audit and manifest files must be kept together in the delivery artifact bundle? | fail→pass | 10,973 | 2,597 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,840 | 857 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 A client requested an intentional custom layout overlap on Slide 8 that bypasses standard geometry constraints. We need to log this as an approved exception. What specific metadata fields must be recorded for every documented exception? | pass→pass | 7,904 | 2,124 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,587 | 711 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 After generating the PPTX file, we need to compare the resulting file against our layout tree definition. What four properties must be compared between the reopened PPTX presentation and the layout tree? | fail→pass | 8,220 | 1,536 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,492 | 582 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 We are performing the accessibility audit phase on a generated presentation deck. Besides checking image alt text, what five document structure and content accessibility elements must be verified? | fail→pass | 8,791 | 4,883 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,738 | 1,111 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 A headless slide renderer is installed on our test runner, allowing us to inspect slide image previews during QA. What five specific visual defects and typography characteristics should be evaluated in these previews? | fail→pass | 8,560 | 4,380 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,529 | 1,041 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 We are writing the automated gate rule for our presentation delivery pipeline. Which five specific error types must have a count of exactly zero for the quality gate to pass? | fail→pass | 8,352 | 1,712 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,335 | 632 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 A layout geometry check failed due to a box collision on Slide 3. Describe the exact step-by-step remediation process required to resolve the failure and re-verify the slide deck. | fail→pass | 9,423 | 5,996 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,947 | 1,640 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 Our build pipeline generates both preliminary draft decks for internal review and final production decks for client delivery. How does the package validation process differ between an internal draft deck and a production deck? | fail→pass | 16,899 | 8,658 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,651 | 1,965 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 During an accessibility audit of a financial summary deck, our reviewer noticed decorative accent line graphics missing alt text. Should decorative background graphics and meaningful chart figures be treated identically regarding alt text requirements? | pass→pass | 9,492 | 9,576 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,622 | 1,839 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 We are starting a new client project and need to define a 6-color RGB color palette and font pairing for our corporate PowerPoint theme template. Please design a modern blue-and-gold color palette with primary, secondary, accent, and background hex codes along with typography recommendations. | fail→fail | 13,763 | 27,419 | +99% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,702 | 6,510 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 Write a Python script using python-pptx to programmatically insert a 4x5 table onto Slide 2, populate it with sales revenue data from a CSV file, and apply custom cell padding and background shading. | fail→fail | 16,529 | 23,323 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,080 | 6,176 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 I have a 10-slide deck ready for an upcoming keynote. Please draft persuasive speaker notes and narrative talking points for each slide to help me present the quarterly performance figures to investors. | fail→fail | 16,548 | 20,455 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,857 | 3,740 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 When reviewing the geometric coordinate contract prior to assembling the presentation, which project reference file contains the standardized checklist that must be applied? | fail→pass | 3,962 | 1,347 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 591 | 514 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 A developer wants to simplify slide generation by generating slide layouts as full-page background images and adding tiny text overlays. What is the designated role of images relative to slide content in deliverable decks? | pass→pass | 8,345 | 3,436 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,363 | 904 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |