Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Implement comprehensive observability for service meshes including distributed tracing, metrics, and visualization. Use when setting up mesh monitoring, debugging latency issues, or implementing SLOs for service communication.
.claude/skills/wshobson-service-mesh-observability/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -39% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 1% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -59% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -10% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -3% | 0% |
Complete guide to observability patterns for Istio, Linkerd, and service mesh deployments.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Observability │
├─────────────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┤
│ Metrics │ Traces │ Logs │
│ │ │ │
│ • Request rate │ • Span context │ • Access logs │
│ • Error rate │ • Latency │ • Error details │
│ • Latency P50 │ • Dependencies │ • Debug info │
│ • Saturation │ • Bottlenecks │ • Audit trail │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘| Signal | Description | Alert Threshold | | -------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------- | | Latency | Request duration P50, P99 | P99 > 500ms | | Traffic | Requests per second | Anomaly detection | | Errors | 5xx error rate | > 1% | | Saturation | Resource utilization | > 80% |
Full template library and detailed worked examples live in references/details.md. Read that file when you need the concrete templates.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,775 | 2,322 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,227 | 908 | -59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 16,102 | 11,570 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,506 | 2,980 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 10,568 | 8,250 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,197 | 1,985 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 11,395 | 8,077 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,378 | 2,297 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 9,253 | 6,632 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,830 | 1,832 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 16,417 | 10,556 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,589 | 2,575 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 16,544 | 12,869 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,673 | 3,076 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 16,579 | 13,429 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,025 | 3,093 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,748 | 14,356 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,342 | 2,988 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 11,235 | 10,433 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,877 | 2,319 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 9,450 | 9,204 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,946 | 1,999 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 12,630 | 3,333 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,287 | 1,061 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 7,747 | 2,121 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,450 | 881 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 16,959 | 17,887 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,839 | 3,296 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 12,309 | 9,716 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,168 | 2,354 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→fail | 10,927 | 8,770 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,839 | 1,852 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,082 | 6,010 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,678 | 1,712 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 6,272 | 6,803 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,138 | 1,798 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,667 | 16,809 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,941 | 3,827 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 6,673 | 7,505 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,305 | 1,883 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 18,172 | 16,924 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,464 | 3,733 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 14,733 | 18,404 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,899 | 3,951 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.