Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →xintaofei/scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality.
Passed 0 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 24 of 24 without it.
0 fixed22 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Critical thinking is a systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks. Apply this skill for critical analysis of scientific claims.
This skill should be used when:
Only add figures when the user explicitly requests a diagram (for example, a GRADE flowchart, bias decision tree, or evidence-quality framework).
When figures help:
How to create figures:
From the scientific-schematics skill directory, with OPENROUTER_API_KEY set:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "GRADE evidence assessment flowchart with downgrade and upgrade factors" -o figures/grade_flowchart.png --doc-type report
Disclosure: AI schematic generation sends your prompt to OpenRouter (a third-party API). Do not include unpublished sensitive details unless that transmission is appropriate for your project.
test cases passed, vs 24 / 24 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.