Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →yogsoth-ai/anomaly-characterization
SOP: Describe and classify anomalous phenomena that existing theory cannot explain
Passed 15 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 3 of 23 without it.
and 17 more in the full report
15 fixed0 passed either way5 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 15 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
The system behavior feels strange today and users are reporting odd results compared to normal expected behavior of 99.9% uptime. Please provide a JSON characterization of this anomaly.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Indicates that the anomaly description is insufficient. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Systematically describe and classify anomalous phenomena to provide a precise starting point for abductive reasoning.
Not satisfied → stop and return error: anomaly description insufficient, concrete observation and reference baseline required.
{
"anomaly_id": "A1",
"phenomenon": "Precise description of what was observed",
"expected": "What theory or prior evidence predicted",
"deviation": {
"direction": "higher | lower | absent | present | different_pattern",
"magnitude": "Quantitative or qualitative estimate",
"frequency": "Isolated | recurring | systematic"
},
"excluded_explanations": [
{"explanation": "...", "reason_excluded": "..."}
],
"anomaly_type": "unexpected_absence | unexpected_presence | unexpected_magnitude | unexpected_pattern | unexpected_timing",
"severity": "minor | moderate | major",
"notes": "Additional context"
}
test cases passed, vs 3 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.