Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →yogsoth-ai/assumption-negation
Classic reductio ad absurdum: negate the core claim, derive logical consequences, seek contradiction or absurdity.
Passed 19 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 21 without it.
and 6 more in the full report
9 fixed14 passed either way0 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
If the evaluation of derived consequence chains reveals no contradiction or absurdity, which fallback subagent is dispatched to handle the uncontradicted claim?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Dispatches the claim-refinement subagent | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
| Size | Negation chains | Max derivation depth |
|---|---|---|
| S | 3 | 5 steps |
| M | 6 | 8 steps |
| L | 10 | 12 steps |
claim-negation to produce formal negationdeductive-chain to derive consequencescontradiction-detection to evaluate resultsclaim-refinement for weakened versiontest cases passed, vs 13 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.