▸case-01 Here are five cloud hosting providers with their uptime percentages, monthly rates, and security compliance scores. We need to evaluate them against our baseline vendor criteria across all three metrics. Run an eligibility check on the list, outputting which vendors pass and which are disqualified. For any disqualified vendor, provide the specific requirement they failed, their recorded value, and the cutoff line. | fail→fail | 10,638 | 11,931 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 607 | 2,211 | +264% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 Property X offers 4,800 sq ft at $22,000/month rent with 25 parking spaces. Our site requirements specify a minimum of 5,000 sq ft, a maximum rent of $25,000/month, and a minimum of 20 parking spaces. Since Property X is $3,000 below our monthly budget and offers 5 extra parking spaces, can Property X be recommended as meeting our site selection criteria? | pass→pass | 5,622 | 5,036 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,131 | 1,151 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Carrier Alpha has an outstanding safety score of 98/100 and liability insurance of $2,000,000, but operates a fleet of 8 trucks. Our qualification criteria require safety score >= 90, insurance >= $1,000,000, and fleet size >= 10 trucks. Given Carrier Alpha's near-perfect safety record and double the required insurance, should Carrier Alpha be approved as a qualified freight carrier? | fail→pass | 10,168 | 5,394 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,643 | 1,191 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 Candidate A has 8 years of Python experience, $120,000 salary requirement, and 1 year of Kubernetes experience. Our mandatory candidate criteria are Python >= 4 years, salary <= $140,000, and Kubernetes >= 2 years. Since Candidate A has double the required Python experience and asks for $20,000 below maximum budget, can Candidate A pass to the final interview round? | pass→pass | 7,970 | 4,305 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,374 | 977 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 Supplier 1 holds ISO 13485 certification, delivers in 5 days (against a 14-day limit), but has a defect rate of 0.08%. Our mandatory supplier thresholds are ISO 13485 certification = Yes, delivery lead time <= 14 days, and defect rate <= 0.05%. Given Supplier 1's extremely fast delivery speed, can Supplier 1 be designated as an approved vendor? | pass→pass | 8,994 | 7,577 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,532 | 1,527 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 Applicant 101 has an annual income of $150,000 and debt-to-income ratio of 20%, but a credit score of 680. Our loan approval criteria require annual income >= $80,000, debt-to-income <= 35%, and credit score >= 700. Considering Applicant 101's exceptionally high income and low debt ratio, should this credit application be approved? | fail→pass | 11,237 | 5,877 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,747 | 1,251 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 Capacitor X is priced at $0.25 (below the $0.45 cap) with a voltage rating of 100V (well above the 50V minimum), but has a maximum operating temperature of 85C. Our circuit design constraints require price <= $0.45, voltage rating >= 50V, and operating temperature >= 105C. Can Capacitor X be cleared for production use in this board? | pass→pass | 3,638 | 2,787 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 761 | 741 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 NetFast provides pricing of $1.00 per million requests (half our $2.00 max limit) and SLA availability of 99.999%, but records p99 latency of 22ms. Our mandatory gateway metrics are pricing <= $2.00, SLA >= 99.99%, and p99 latency <= 15ms. Given NetFast's high SLA and low price, can NetFast be selected as a compliant API gateway? | pass→pass | 4,905 | 6,966 | +42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 925 | 1,512 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 Startup Alpha reports Monthly Recurring Revenue of $120,000 (well above our $50,000 minimum) and a Burn Multiple of 1.2 (better than our 2.0 max limit), but has Month-over-Month growth of 10%. Our investment mandates require MRR >= $50,000, Burn Multiple <= 2.0, and MoM growth >= 15%. Should Startup Alpha move forward to partner due diligence? | pass→pass | 5,992 | 5,063 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,065 | 1,192 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 Site A features 16 loading docks (double our requirement of 8) and is located 10 miles from the freight terminal (well within our 25-mile max limit), but has a clear height of 24 ft. Our non-negotiable warehouse specs are loading docks >= 8, distance <= 25 miles, and clear height >= 28 ft. Can Site A be selected as a qualified distribution facility? | pass→pass | 3,147 | 4,276 | +36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 573 | 1,004 | +75% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 DC West offers fiber latency of 2 ms and Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of 1.15 (well below our 1.25 limit), but provides 4 MW power capacity. Our AI facility criteria demand fiber latency <= 5 ms, PUE <= 1.25, and power capacity >= 5 MW. Given DC West's superior energy efficiency and ultra-low latency, does DC West pass our site qualification? | pass→pass | 4,698 | 3,266 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 858 | 780 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 Van 1 has a cargo volume of 480 cu ft (exceeding our 400 cu ft spec) and is priced at $45,000 (below our $55,000 budget), but has a payload capacity of 3,200 lbs. Our fleet acquisition thresholds are cargo volume >= 400 cu ft, unit price <= $55,000, and payload capacity >= 3,500 lbs. Can Van 1 be approved for fleet procurement? | pass→pass | 3,963 | 4,460 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 865 | 1,093 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 Subcontractor A maintains an OSHA recordable incident rate of 1.5 (well below our 2.5 maximum) and a safety plan score of 95/100, but has an Experience Modification Rate (EMR) of 0.95. Our mandatory subcontractor safety criteria are OSHA rate <= 2.5, safety score >= 85, and EMR <= 0.90. Can Subcontractor A be awarded the site contract? | pass→pass | 6,251 | 6,692 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,125 | 1,480 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 Panel X features high module efficiency of 23.0% (above our 21.5% requirement) and a warranty period of 30 years (above our 25-year spec), but has an annual degradation rate of 0.5%. Our strict solar module procurement baselines are efficiency >= 21.5%, warranty >= 25 years, and annual degradation <= 0.4%. Does Panel X qualify for the procurement list? | pass→pass | 3,176 | 5,652 | +78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 558 | 1,266 | +127% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 Scanner Alpha delivers scan throughput of 1,000 IPs/hr (double our 500 IPs/hr requirement) and CVE coverage of 99.5% (above our 98% baseline), but records a false positive rate of 4%. Our security ops evaluation criteria require throughput >= 500 IPs/hr, CVE coverage >= 98%, and false positive rate <= 2%. Can Scanner Alpha be approved as our enterprise vulnerability scanner? | pass→pass | 5,549 | 2,647 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 997 | 803 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 Platform A provides 99% airline inventory coverage and 5-minute support response SLA, but charges a transaction fee of $12.00. Our mandatory platform requirements are inventory coverage >= 95%, support SLA <= 15 minutes, and transaction fee <= $8.00. Can Platform A be selected as our corporate travel vendor? | pass→pass | 3,709 | 7,155 | +93% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 745 | 1,590 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 Batch 1 tests at 99.9% purity (exceeding our 99.5% spec) and heavy metal concentration of 1 ppm (well below our 5 ppm limit), but contains 0.15% moisture content. Our mandatory chemical QA specifications are purity >= 99.5%, heavy metals <= 5 ppm, and moisture content <= 0.10%. Can Batch 1 be released for manufacturing? | pass→pass | 6,088 | 3,832 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,114 | 972 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 Policy 1 offers $15,000,000 in property coverage (above our $10,000,000 requirement) with an AM Best rating of A+, but carries a deductible of $50,000. Our risk management standards require property coverage >= $10,000,000, AM Best rating >= A, and deductible <= $25,000. Can Policy 1 be approved to fulfill our coverage mandate? | pass→pass | 4,501 | 7,233 | +61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 882 | 1,555 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 Server A features a CPU clock speed of 5.0 GHz (above our 4.5 GHz spec) and network adapter latency of 0.6 us (better than our 1.0 us limit), but includes 128 GB RAM. Our low-latency trading benchmarks require clock speed >= 4.5 GHz, latency <= 1.0 us, and RAM capacity >= 256 GB. Can Server A be deployed in the trading colocation rack? | pass→pass | 3,892 | 4,585 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 808 | 1,150 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 We want to rank three IT service vendors (Vendor Alpha, Vendor Beta, Vendor Gamma) using a multi-criteria weighted scoring model. Assign weights of 40% to Cost, 40% to Service Quality, and 20% to Delivery Speed. Calculate a composite score for each vendor so that high quality can offset slightly higher cost, and order them by final score. | pass→pass | 11,771 | 17,404 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,306 | 3,473 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 Screen job candidates for an expedited fast-track interview list. A candidate qualifies if they satisfy ANY of these three alternative paths: at least 10 years industry experience, OR a PhD in Computer Science, OR at least 3 major patent filings. Candidate 1 has 12 years experience without a PhD or patents. Candidate 2 has a PhD but 2 years experience. Determine who makes the shortlist. | pass→pass | 3,489 | 10,025 | +187% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 639 | 2,004 | +214% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 We are selecting cloud compute instances for a data science workload balancing hourly price and benchmark benchmark score. Rather than enforcing fixed cutoff rules or disqualifications, analyze the candidate list to identify all Pareto-optimal (non-dominated) instances where no alternative is simultaneously cheaper and faster. | fail→fail | 7,054 | 9,707 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,061 | 1,896 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |