▸case-21 We are starting a research campaign on microplastic accumulation in marine organisms. Here are ten recent PubMed abstracts. Please perform a literature review gap analysis to identify unexplored research opportunities. | fail→fail | 16,378 | 30,790 | +88% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,369 | 6,028 | +154% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 We have drafted a raw research question on quantum computing encryption: 'How does lattice-based cryptography perform against Shor's algorithm?'. We have not evaluated its feasibility, novelty, or ethical implications yet. Please conduct the initial FINER assessment and assign scores for each criterion. | pass→pass | 21,775 | 25,878 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,639 | 4,174 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-01 I've completed the preliminary evaluations and framework mappings for our machine learning project. Here are the framework files, scope assessments, sub-questions, and FINER screening scores for our candidate questions. Please combine all these intermediate assets into the final research question compilation, ensuring each entry lists its main question, framework details, scope, success metrics, sub-questions, and FINER check results. | fail→pass | 37,743 | 25,648 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,286 | 4,224 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 We are ready to wrap up the question formulation phase for our healthcare study. Attached are the framework breakdowns, scope boundary notes, sub-question dependencies, and FINER validation logs for the proposed research topics. Please process these intermediate materials into the final research question deliverable, detailing for each topic the main statement, framework breakdown, scope limits, quantitative success criteria, sub-questions, and FINER score status. | fail→fail | 53,099 | 17,244 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,135 | 2,651 | -67% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Here are the raw deliverables from our climate policy investigation: PICO framework mappings, boundary assessments, sub-question lists, and FINER evaluation records. Can you run the final synthesis step to generate our official research question set document? Please ensure each question entry clearly presents its core question statement, framework mapping, in-scope/out-of-scope boundaries, success metrics, sub-questions, and FINER pass status. | fail→pass | 37,806 | 24,835 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,621 | 4,478 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 We are assembling the final research question document for our urban transport study. Candidate Question 1 passed the PICO mapping and scored 5/5 on FINER. Candidate Question 2 completed SPIDER mapping but failed the FINER Feasibility check due to data unavailability. Please generate the final research question set document incorporating both candidate questions. | pass→fail | 19,484 | 19,000 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,446 | 3,017 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 Here are two proposed research questions for our renewable energy study: RQ1 has passed all FINER checks and includes complete PICO mapping details. RQ2 has passed all FINER checks, but the team has not yet completed its framework application mapping. Please produce the final research question set document for both. | fail→fail | 15,023 | 17,699 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,732 | 2,826 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 Our genomics team drafted three research questions. RQ1 and RQ2 underwent complete FINER screening and framework mapping. RQ3 is brand new and has not yet been submitted to FINER evaluation or framework mapping. Synthesize all three into our final research question set deliverable. | pass→pass | 28,883 | 16,940 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,942 | 2,003 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 For our clinical trial project, the preliminary main question statement for RQ1 is drafted as two sentences: 'How does Drug X impact systolic blood pressure in elderly patients over 12 weeks? We also want to observe secondary metabolic markers during this period.' Synthesize this into the final research question format, where the team prefers keeping detailed context in the main statement. | pass→pass | 15,615 | 20,199 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,493 | 2,524 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 Synthesize RQ1 for our cybersecurity study: Main question is 'What is the latency impact of zero-trust architecture on microservices?'. Scope notes mention testing Kubernetes clusters in cloud environments, while explicitly excluding legacy monolithic on-premise servers. The user suggests writing scope as a paragraph narrative. | fail→fail | 11,385 | 21,057 | +85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,129 | 2,506 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 We are finalizing RQ1 for our educational technology assessment. The current draft success criterion states: 'The platform should significantly improve user satisfaction and learning outcomes.' Please compile this into the final research question set output. | pass→pass | 14,868 | 16,696 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,665 | 2,670 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 Compile the final research question entry for our agrotech trial. The input notes state: Feasible: Yes, Interesting: Yes, Novel: Yes, Ethical: Yes, Relevant: Yes. Model reviewers suggested displaying this as a percentage score (100%) or letter grade (A+). Synthesize this entry into the final question set. | fail→fail | 24,442 | 16,117 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 932 | 2,406 | +158% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 Synthesize RQ1 for our logistics optimization project. The draft input provides a main question, framework details, scope boundaries, success criteria, and FINER pass status, but omits the sub-questions field. How should this be formatted in the final output? | pass→pass | 15,826 | 5,734 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,654 | 1,284 | -52% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 For our fintech research campaign, synthesize RQ1 using the PICO framework. The input specifies Population = retail banking app users, Intervention = biometric authentication, Comparison = password login, Outcome = login speed and fraud rate. Assemble this entry into the official research question format. | pass→pass | 9,343 | 13,033 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 672 | 1,717 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 Please synthesize our supply chain research question set. RQ1 framework specifies investigating North American freight routes, but the scope document lists Asian maritime routes as in-scope and North American routes as out-of-scope. Synthesize this into the final document. | pass→pass | 29,225 | 13,152 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,638 | 1,844 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 Synthesize RQ1 for our public health campaign. FINER log: Feasible (Pass), Interesting (Pass), Novel (Fail - duplicate study), Ethical (Pass), Relevant (Pass). The project lead asks to include RQ1 in the synthesized output anyway with a note. | fail→pass | 24,890 | 8,320 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,833 | 1,661 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Our medical research team wants to formulate a new research topic regarding hypertension management. We have a rough idea about comparing ACE inhibitors to ARBs in elderly patients. Please construct a PICO framework table and draft the initial primary question statement from scratch. | pass→pass | 10,240 | 23,087 | +125% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,920 | 3,749 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 For our autonomous vehicle safety study, combine the validated assets for RQ1 into the final research question document. A team member requested converting the 6 components into a standard 6-column CSV table. | fail→fail | 17,979 | 20,982 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,797 | 3,107 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 Synthesize two fully validated research questions (one on pediatric asthma triggers, one on adult diabetes monitoring) into our medical study final output document. | fail→pass | 22,696 | 18,079 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,187 | 3,048 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 Synthesize RQ1 for our water treatment research. The dependency graph indicates Sub-question 1.1 must precede Sub-question 1.2. Combine the framework, scope, success metrics, sub-questions, and FINER results into the deliverable. | pass→pass | 19,179 | 9,239 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,903 | 1,891 | -35% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 Synthesize RQ1 for our qualitative sociology paper using the SPIDER framework (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type). All FINER criteria passed. Format the framework entry appropriately. | pass→pass | 13,248 | 9,245 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,742 | 1,838 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Synthesize RQ1 for our AI ethics investigation. In-scope elements include large language models released between 2022 and 2024. Out-of-scope elements include computer vision models and rule-based expert systems. Compile this into the final research question set document. | pass→pass | 10,946 | 24,198 | +121% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,848 | 2,289 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |