Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 126% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 117% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 490% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 489% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 289% | 0% |
Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates.
/market report or /market report <domain>Before generating the report, check for any existing audit data from previous skill runs. Look for these files in the project directory:
Possible data sources:
MARKETING-AUDIT.md -- from /market auditLANDING-CRO.md -- from /market landingSEO-AUDIT.md -- from /market seoBRAND-VOICE.md -- from /market brandCOMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md -- from /market competitorsFUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md -- from /market funnelCONTENT-AUDIT.md -- from content analysisAD-AUDIT.md -- from /market adsSOCIAL-AUDIT.md -- from /market socialEMAIL-AUDIT.md -- from /market emailsIf no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to:
Score across 6 categories, each worth up to 100 points. The overall score is the weighted average.
Evaluate based on landing page analysis, CRO findings, and UX assessment.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Page load speed | 15 | Under 2s = 15, Under 3s = 10, Under 5s = 5, Over 5s = 0 | | Mobile responsiveness | 15 | Fully responsive = 15, Mostly = 10, Partially = 5, Not = 0 | | Clear value proposition | 20 | Immediately clear = 20, Takes effort = 12, Vague = 5, Missing = 0 | | CTA effectiveness | 20 | Strong and clear = 20, Present but weak = 12, Unclear = 5, Missing = 0 | | Social proof | 15 | Multiple types = 15, Some = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Form optimization | 15 | Optimized = 15, Adequate = 10, Needs work = 5, Broken = 0 |
Evaluate based on SEO audit findings.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Title tags & meta descriptions | 15 | Optimized = 15, Present = 10, Partial = 5, Missing = 0 | | Header hierarchy (H1-H6) | 10 | Proper = 10, Mostly = 7, Needs work = 3, Missing = 0 | | Content quality (E-E-A-T) | 25 | Excellent = 25, Good = 17, Average = 10, Poor = 3 | | Technical SEO | 20 | No issues = 20, Minor issues = 13, Major issues = 7, Critical = 0 | | Internal linking | 15 | Strategic = 15, Present = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Schema markup | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 |
Evaluate based on brand voice analysis and content audit.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Brand voice consistency | 20 | Consistent = 20, Mostly = 13, Inconsistent = 7, No voice = 0 | | Content quality | 25 | Expert-level = 25, Good = 17, Generic = 10, Poor = 3 | | Content variety | 15 | Multiple formats = 15, Some = 10, Limited = 5, Single = 0 | | Publishing frequency | 15 | Regular cadence = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, None = 0 | | Audience targeting | 25 | Precisely targeted = 25, Somewhat = 17, Broad = 10, Off-target = 3 |
Evaluate based on social media presence and engagement.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Platform presence | 15 | Right platforms, active = 15, Present but inactive = 8, Missing key = 3 | | Content quality | 25 | Engaging and on-brand = 25, Adequate = 15, Low quality = 7, Poor = 0 | | Engagement rate | 25 | Above benchmark = 25, At benchmark = 17, Below = 10, Negligible = 3 | | Posting consistency | 15 | Regular schedule = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, Abandoned = 0 | | Community building | 20 | Active community = 20, Some engagement = 13, Broadcast only = 7, None = 0 |
Evaluate based on email marketing assessment.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | List building mechanism | 20 | Multiple opt-ins = 20, One opt-in = 13, No visible opt-in = 5 | | Email design & content | 20 | Professional and engaging = 20, Adequate = 13, Needs work = 7 | | Automation sequences | 25 | Comprehensive = 25, Basic = 15, Minimal = 8, None = 0 | | Segmentation | 20 | Advanced = 20, Basic = 13, None = 5 | | Deliverability signals | 15 | Strong = 15, Adequate = 10, Concerning = 5, Problems = 0 |
Evaluate based on ad account audit (if applicable).
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Campaign structure | 20 | Well-organized = 20, Adequate = 13, Messy = 7, None = 0 | | Targeting quality | 25 | Precise and layered = 25, Good = 17, Broad = 10, Wasteful = 3 | | Ad creative quality | 25 | Compelling and varied = 25, Adequate = 17, Weak = 10, Poor = 3 | | Landing page alignment | 15 | Perfect match = 15, Good = 10, Misaligned = 5, Broken = 0 | | Tracking & attribution | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, Missing = 0 |
Overall Score = (Website * 0.25) + (SEO * 0.20) + (Content * 0.15) + (Social * 0.15) + (Email * 0.15) + (Paid * 0.10)Score Interpretation: | Score Range | Rating | Meaning | |---|---|---| | 85-100 | Excellent | Marketing is a competitive advantage. Optimize and scale. | | 70-84 | Good | Solid foundation with clear improvement opportunities. | | 55-69 | Average | Functional but leaving significant growth on the table. | | 40-54 | Below Average | Multiple areas need attention. Significant opportunity cost. | | 0-39 | Critical | Marketing is actively hurting growth. Immediate action required. |
For each of the 6 categories, provide:
Revenue Impact Estimation Framework:
Impact = (Estimated traffic change * Conversion rate change * Average deal value) * Confidence factor
Example:
- Current monthly traffic: 10,000
- Recommended SEO improvements could increase traffic 30%: +3,000 visits
- Current conversion rate: 2%, CRO could improve to 3%: +1% = +130 conversions
- Average deal value: $500
- Estimated monthly revenue impact: $65,000
- Confidence factor (conservative): 0.5
- Conservative estimate: $32,500/month additional revenueIf competitor data is available from /market competitors, include:
Competitive Positioning Matrix: | Factor | Client | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 | |---|---|---|---|---| | Website Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | SEO Visibility | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Content Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Social Presence | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Overall Position | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 |
Competitive Advantages: What the client does better Competitive Gaps: Where competitors outperform the client Opportunities: Spaces competitors are not addressing
Summarize content findings across all channels:
Compile all conversion-related findings:
Summarize SEO health in a scannable format:
SEO Health Snapshot:
- Title Tags: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing]
- Meta Descriptions: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing]
- H1 Tags: [Proper / Issues / Missing]
- Image Alt Text: [Complete / Partial / Missing]
- Page Speed: [Fast / Moderate / Slow]
- Mobile-Friendly: [Yes / Partially / No]
- Schema Markup: [Present / Partial / Missing]
- Robots.txt: [Configured / Issues / Missing]
- Sitemap: [Present / Issues / Missing]
- HTTPS: [Yes / No]
- Core Web Vitals: [Pass / Needs Work / Fail]Organize all recommendations into three tiers:
High impact, low effort changes. These should be implementable within 1-5 business days.
Format each item as:
- [ ] [Action item]: [Specific description]
- Impact: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
- Effort: [1-5 hours]
- Expected Result: [Specific outcome]
- Revenue Impact: [$X/month estimated]Moderate impact, moderate effort. These require 1-4 weeks.
High impact, high effort. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort.
Days 1-30: Foundation & Quick Wins
Days 31-60: Growth & Optimization
Days 61-90: Scale & Expand
Include methodology notes so the client understands how scores were derived:
Scoring Methodology:
Tools Used:
Glossary:
Generate a file called MARKETING-REPORT.md with:
markdown# Marketing Report ## [Company/Domain Name] ### Prepared by: [Agent/Agency Name] ### Date: [Date] --- ## Executive Summary ### Overall Marketing Score: [X/100] -- [Rating] [2-3 paragraph summary covering: current state assessment, top 3 findings, estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations, and recommended first steps] ### Score Breakdown | Category | Score | Rating | |---|---|---| | Website & Conversion | X/100 | [Rating] | | SEO & Organic | X/100 | [Rating] | | Content & Messaging | X/100 | [Rating] | | Social Media | X/100 | [Rating] | | Email & Automation | X/100 | [Rating] | | Paid Advertising | X/100 | [Rating] | | **Overall** | **X/100** | **[Rating]** | ### Top 3 Priority Actions 1. [Most impactful recommendation with revenue estimate] 2. [Second most impactful recommendation] 3. [Third most impactful recommendation] --- ## Detailed Findings ### 1. Website & Conversion [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis with findings, what's working, gaps, recommendations] ### 2. SEO & Organic [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 3. Content & Messaging [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 4. Social Media [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 5. Email & Automation [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 6. Paid Advertising [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] --- ## Competitor Comparison [Matrix and analysis] --- ## SEO Snapshot [Health checklist] --- ## Conversion Optimization Summary [Funnel analysis and CRO recommendations] --- ## Revenue Impact Summary | Recommendation | Estimated Monthly Impact | Confidence | Priority | |---|---|---|---| | [Rec 1] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 1 | | [Rec 2] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 2 | | ... | ... | ... | ... | | **Total Estimated Impact** | **$XX,XXX/month** | | | --- ## Prioritized Action Plan ### Quick Wins (This Week) - [ ] [Action items with impact and effort] ### Medium-Term (This Month) - [ ] [Action items] ### Strategic (This Quarter) - [ ] [Action items] --- ## 30-60-90 Day Roadmap [Week-by-week plan] --- ## Appendix ### Methodology ### Tools Used ### Glossary ### Data Sources
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.