Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
.claude/skills/acreadiness-policy/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Use this skill when the user asks about policies, strict mode, custom scoring, disabling checks, org standards, or CI gating of readiness.
A policy is a small JSON file with three optional sections — criteria, extras, thresholds — that customise how AgentRC scores readiness.
AgentRC ships with three example policies in examples/policies/:
| Policy | What it does | |---|---| | strict.json | 100% pass rate, raises impact on key criteria | | ai-only.json | Disables all repo-health checks, focuses on AI tooling | | repo-health-only.json | Disables AI checks, focuses on traditional quality |
Recommend these as starting points before writing a custom policy.
jsonc{ "name": "my-policy", "criteria": { "disable": ["env-example", "observability", "dependabot"], "override": { "readme": { "impact": "high", "level": 2 }, "lint-config": { "title": "Linter required" } } }, "extras": { "disable": ["pre-commit"] }, "thresholds": { "passRate": 0.9 } }
| Impact | Weight | |---|---| | critical | 5 | | high | 4 | | medium | 3 | | low | 2 | | info | 0 |
Score = 1 − (deductions / max possible weight). Grades: A ≥ 0.9, B ≥ 0.8, C ≥ 0.7, D ≥ 0.6, F < 0.6.
showList policies currently in effect (from agentrc.config.json policies array, or none).
new <name>Scaffold policies/<name>.json with sensible defaults. Walk the user through:
observability for a static site).impact to high or critical for must-haves (e.g. readme, codeowners).0.7 (lenient), 0.85 (standard), 1.0 (strict).agentrc.config.json:json { "policies": ["./policies/<name>.json"] }
apply <path-or-pkg>Run agentrc readiness --json --policy <source> and re-render the report by handing off to the assess skill / ai-readiness-reporter agent. Supports chaining:
bashnpx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --json --policy ./org-baseline.json,./team-frontend.json
Combine policies with --fail-level to enforce a minimum maturity level in CI:
yaml- run: npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --policy ./policies/strict.json --fail-level 3
JSON policies can disable, override, and set thresholds — but cannot add new criteria. For new detection logic, point users at AgentRC's TypeScript plugin system (docs/dev/plugins.md).
observability, confirm and explain the trade-off.impact over disabling. Disabling hides the gap entirely; overriding lets it still appear in the report.--policy a.json,b.json.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +82 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.