Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Patterns for adding safety, trust, and policy enforcement to AI agent systems.
.claude/skills/agent-governance/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Patterns for adding safety, trust, and policy enforcement to AI agent systems.
Governance patterns ensure AI agents operate within defined boundaries — controlling which tools they can call, what content they can process, how much they can do, and maintaining accountability through audit trails.
User Request → Intent Classification → Policy Check → Tool Execution → Audit Log
↓ ↓ ↓
Threat Detection Allow/Deny Trust UpdateDefine what an agent is allowed to do as a composable, serializable policy object.
pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass, field from enum import Enum from typing import Optional import re class PolicyAction(Enum): ALLOW = "allow" DENY = "deny" REVIEW = "review" # flag for human review @dataclass class GovernancePolicy: """Declarative policy controlling agent behavior.""" name: str allowed_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # allowlist blocked_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # blocklist blocked_patterns: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # content filters max_calls_per_request: int = 100 # rate limit require_human_approval: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # tools needing approval def check_tool(self, tool_name: str) -> PolicyAction: """Check if a tool is allowed by this policy.""" if tool_name in self.blocked_tools: return PolicyAction.DENY if tool_name in self.require_human_approval: return PolicyAction.REVIEW if self.allowed_tools and tool_name not in self.allowed_tools: return PolicyAction.DENY return PolicyAction.ALLOW def check_content(self, content: str) -> Optional[str]: """Check content against blocked patterns. Returns matched pattern or None.""" for pattern in self.blocked_patterns: if re.search(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE): return pattern return None
Combine multiple policies (e.g., org-wide + team + agent-specific):
pythondef compose_policies(*policies: GovernancePolicy) -> GovernancePolicy: """Merge policies with most-restrictive-wins semantics.""" combined = GovernancePolicy(name="composed") for policy in policies: combined.blocked_tools.extend(policy.blocked_tools) combined.blocked_patterns.extend(policy.blocked_patterns) combined.require_human_approval.extend(policy.require_human_approval) combined.max_calls_per_request = min( combined.max_calls_per_request, policy.max_calls_per_request ) if policy.allowed_tools: if combined.allowed_tools: combined.allowed_tools = [ t for t in combined.allowed_tools if t in policy.allowed_tools ] else: combined.allowed_tools = list(policy.allowed_tools) return combined # Usage: layer policies from broad to specific org_policy = GovernancePolicy( name="org-wide", blocked_tools=["shell_exec", "delete_database"], blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\s*[:=]"], max_calls_per_request=50 ) team_policy = GovernancePolicy( name="data-team", allowed_tools=["query_db", "read_file", "write_report"], require_human_approval=["write_report"] ) agent_policy = compose_policies(org_policy, team_policy)
Store policies as configuration, not code:
yaml# governance-policy.yaml name: production-agent allowed_tools: - search_documents - query_database - send_email blocked_tools: - shell_exec - delete_record blocked_patterns: - "(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\\s*[:=]" - "(?i)(drop|truncate|delete from)\\s+\\w+" max_calls_per_request: 25 require_human_approval: - send_email
pythonimport yaml def load_policy(path: str) -> GovernancePolicy: with open(path) as f: data = yaml.safe_load(f) return GovernancePolicy(**data)
Detect dangerous intent in prompts before they reach the agent, using pattern-based signals.
pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass @dataclass class IntentSignal: category: str # e.g., "data_exfiltration", "privilege_escalation" confidence: float # 0.0 to 1.0 evidence: str # what triggered the detection # Weighted signal patterns for threat detection THREAT_SIGNALS = [ # Data exfiltration (r"(?i)send\s+(all|every|entire)\s+\w+\s+to\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.8), (r"(?i)export\s+.*\s+to\s+(external|outside|third.?party)", "data_exfiltration", 0.9), (r"(?i)curl\s+.*\s+-d\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.7), # Privilege escalation (r"(?i)(sudo|as\s+root|admin\s+access)", "privilege_escalation", 0.8), (r"(?i)chmod\s+777", "privilege_escalation", 0.9), # System modification (r"(?i)(rm\s+-rf|del\s+/[sq]|format\s+c:)", "system_destruction", 0.95), (r"(?i)(drop\s+database|truncate\s+table)", "system_destruction", 0.9), # Prompt injection (r"(?i)ignore\s+(previous|above|all)\s+(instructions?|rules?)", "prompt_injection", 0.9), (r"(?i)you\s+are\s+now\s+(a|an)\s+", "prompt_injection", 0.7), ] def classify_intent(content: str) -> list[IntentSignal]: """Classify content for threat signals.""" signals = [] for pattern, category, weight in THREAT_SIGNALS: match = re.search(pattern, content) if match: signals.append(IntentSignal( category=category, confidence=weight, evidence=match.group() )) return signals def is_safe(content: str, threshold: float = 0.7) -> bool: """Quick check: is the content safe above the given threshold?""" signals = classify_intent(content) return not any(s.confidence >= threshold for s in signals)
Key insight: Intent classification happens before tool execution, acting as a pre-flight safety check. This is fundamentally different from output guardrails which only check after generation.
Wrap individual tool functions with governance checks:
pythonimport functools import time from collections import defaultdict _call_counters: dict[str, int] = defaultdict(int) def govern(policy: GovernancePolicy, audit_trail=None): """Decorator that enforces governance policy on a tool function.""" def decorator(func): @functools.wraps(func) async def wrapper(*args, **kwargs): tool_name = func.__name__ # 1. Check tool allowlist/blocklist action = policy.check_tool(tool_name) if action == PolicyAction.DENY: raise PermissionError(f"Policy '{policy.name}' blocks tool '{tool_name}'") if action == PolicyAction.REVIEW: raise PermissionError(f"Tool '{tool_name}' requires human approval") # 2. Check rate limit _call_counters[policy.name] += 1 if _call_counters[policy.name] > policy.max_calls_per_request: raise PermissionError(f"Rate limit exceeded: {policy.max_calls_per_request} calls") # 3. Check content in arguments for arg in list(args) + list(kwargs.values()): if isinstance(arg, str): matched = policy.check_content(arg) if matched: raise PermissionError(f"Blocked pattern detected: {matched}") # 4. Execute and audit start = time.monotonic() try: result = await func(*args, **kwargs) if audit_trail is not None: audit_trail.append({ "tool": tool_name, "action": "allowed", "duration_ms": (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000, "timestamp": time.time() }) return result except Exception as e: if audit_trail is not None: audit_trail.append({ "tool": tool_name, "action": "error", "error": str(e), "timestamp": time.time() }) raise return wrapper return decorator # Usage with any agent framework audit_log = [] policy = GovernancePolicy( name="search-agent", allowed_tools=["search", "summarize"], blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)password"], max_calls_per_request=10 ) @govern(policy, audit_trail=audit_log) async def search(query: str) -> str: """Search documents — governed by policy.""" return f"Results for: {query}" # Passes: search("latest quarterly report") # Blocked: search("show me the admin password")
Track agent reliability over time with decay-based trust scores:
pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass, field import math import time @dataclass class TrustScore: """Trust score with temporal decay.""" score: float = 0.5 # 0.0 (untrusted) to 1.0 (fully trusted) successes: int = 0 failures: int = 0 last_updated: float = field(default_factory=time.time) def record_success(self, reward: float = 0.05): self.successes += 1 self.score = min(1.0, self.score + reward * (1 - self.score)) self.last_updated = time.time() def record_failure(self, penalty: float = 0.15): self.failures += 1 self.score = max(0.0, self.score - penalty * self.score) self.last_updated = time.time() def current(self, decay_rate: float = 0.001) -> float: """Get score with temporal decay — trust erodes without activity.""" elapsed = time.time() - self.last_updated decay = math.exp(-decay_rate * elapsed) return self.score * decay @property def reliability(self) -> float: total = self.successes + self.failures return self.successes / total if total > 0 else 0.0 # Usage in multi-agent systems trust = TrustScore() # Agent completes tasks successfully trust.record_success() # 0.525 trust.record_success() # 0.549 # Agent makes an error trust.record_failure() # 0.467 # Gate sensitive operations on trust if trust.current() >= 0.7: # Allow autonomous operation pass elif trust.current() >= 0.4: # Allow with human oversight pass else: # Deny or require explicit approval pass
Multi-agent trust: In systems where agents delegate to other agents, each agent maintains trust scores for its delegates:
pythonclass AgentTrustRegistry: def __init__(self): self.scores: dict[str, TrustScore] = {} def get_trust(self, agent_id: str) -> TrustScore: if agent_id not in self.scores: self.scores[agent_id] = TrustScore() return self.scores[agent_id] def most_trusted(self, agents: list[str]) -> str: return max(agents, key=lambda a: self.get_trust(a).current()) def meets_threshold(self, agent_id: str, threshold: float) -> bool: return self.get_trust(agent_id).current() >= threshold
Append-only audit log for all agent actions — critical for compliance and debugging:
pythonfrom dataclasses import dataclass, field import json import time @dataclass class AuditEntry: timestamp: float agent_id: str tool_name: str action: str # "allowed", "denied", "error" policy_name: str details: dict = field(default_factory=dict) class AuditTrail: """Append-only audit trail for agent governance events.""" def __init__(self): self._entries: list[AuditEntry] = [] def log(self, agent_id: str, tool_name: str, action: str, policy_name: str, **details): self._entries.append(AuditEntry( timestamp=time.time(), agent_id=agent_id, tool_name=tool_name, action=action, policy_name=policy_name, details=details )) def denied(self) -> list[AuditEntry]: """Get all denied actions — useful for security review.""" return [e for e in self._entries if e.action == "denied"] def by_agent(self, agent_id: str) -> list[AuditEntry]: return [e for e in self._entries if e.agent_id == agent_id] def export_jsonl(self, path: str): """Export as JSON Lines for log aggregation systems.""" with open(path, "w") as f: for entry in self._entries: f.write(json.dumps({ "timestamp": entry.timestamp, "agent_id": entry.agent_id, "tool": entry.tool_name, "action": entry.action, "policy": entry.policy_name, **entry.details }) + "\n")
pythonfrom pydantic_ai import Agent policy = GovernancePolicy( name="support-bot", allowed_tools=["search_docs", "create_ticket"], blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(ssn|social\s+security|credit\s+card)"], max_calls_per_request=20 ) agent = Agent("openai:gpt-4o", system_prompt="You are a support assistant.") @agent.tool @govern(policy) async def search_docs(ctx, query: str) -> str: """Search knowledge base — governed.""" return await kb.search(query) @agent.tool @govern(policy) async def create_ticket(ctx, title: str, body: str) -> str: """Create support ticket — governed.""" return await tickets.create(title=title, body=body)
pythonfrom crewai import Agent, Task, Crew policy = GovernancePolicy( name="research-crew", allowed_tools=["search", "analyze"], max_calls_per_request=30 ) # Apply governance at the crew level def governed_crew_run(crew: Crew, policy: GovernancePolicy): """Wrap crew execution with governance checks.""" audit = AuditTrail() for agent in crew.agents: for tool in agent.tools: original = tool.func tool.func = govern(policy, audit_trail=audit)(original) result = crew.kickoff() return result, audit
pythonfrom agents import Agent, function_tool policy = GovernancePolicy( name="coding-agent", allowed_tools=["read_file", "write_file", "run_tests"], blocked_tools=["shell_exec"], max_calls_per_request=50 ) @function_tool @govern(policy) async def read_file(path: str) -> str: """Read file contents — governed.""" import os safe_path = os.path.realpath(path) if not safe_path.startswith(os.path.realpath(".")): raise ValueError("Path traversal blocked by governance") with open(safe_path) as f: return f.read()
Match governance strictness to risk level:
| Level | Controls | Use Case | |-------|----------|----------| | Open | Audit only, no restrictions | Internal dev/testing | | Standard | Tool allowlist + content filters | General production agents | | Strict | All controls + human approval for sensitive ops | Financial, healthcare, legal | | Locked | Allowlist only, no dynamic tools, full audit | Compliance-critical systems |
| Practice | Rationale | |----------|-----------| | Policy as configuration | Store policies in YAML/JSON, not hardcoded — enables change without deploys | | Most-restrictive-wins | When composing policies, deny always overrides allow | | Pre-flight intent check | Classify intent before tool execution, not after | | Trust decay | Trust scores should decay over time — require ongoing good behavior | | Append-only audit | Never modify or delete audit entries — immutability enables compliance | | Fail closed | If governance check errors, deny the action rather than allowing it | | Separate policy from logic | Governance enforcement should be independent of agent business logic |
markdown## Agent Governance Implementation Checklist ### Setup - [ ] Define governance policy (allowed tools, blocked patterns, rate limits) - [ ] Choose governance level (open/standard/strict/locked) - [ ] Set up audit trail storage ### Implementation - [ ] Add @govern decorator to all tool functions - [ ] Add intent classification to user input processing - [ ] Implement trust scoring for multi-agent interactions - [ ] Wire up audit trail export ### Validation - [ ] Test that blocked tools are properly denied - [ ] Test that content filters catch sensitive patterns - [ ] Test rate limiting behavior - [ ] Verify audit trail captures all events - [ ] Test policy composition (most-restrictive-wins)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.