Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration. Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability.
.claude/skills/agent-orchestration-multi-agent-optimize/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 96% | 224 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
The Multi-Agent Optimization Tool is an advanced AI-driven framework designed to holistically improve system performance through intelligent, coordinated agent-based optimization. Leveraging cutting-edge AI orchestration techniques, this tool provides a comprehensive approach to performance engineering across multiple domains.
The tool processes optimization arguments with flexible input parameters:
$TARGET: Primary system/application to optimize$PERFORMANCE_GOALS: Specific performance metrics and objectives$OPTIMIZATION_SCOPE: Depth of optimization (quick-win, comprehensive)$BUDGET_CONSTRAINTS: Cost and resource limitations$QUALITY_METRICS: Performance quality thresholdspythondef multi_agent_profiler(target_system): agents = [ DatabasePerformanceAgent(target_system), ApplicationPerformanceAgent(target_system), FrontendPerformanceAgent(target_system) ] performance_profile = {} for agent in agents: performance_profile[agent.__class__.__name__] = agent.profile() return aggregate_performance_metrics(performance_profile)
pythondef compress_context(context, max_tokens=4000): # Semantic compression using embedding-based truncation compressed_context = semantic_truncate( context, max_tokens=max_tokens, importance_threshold=0.7 ) return compressed_context
pythonclass MultiAgentOrchestrator: def __init__(self, agents): self.agents = agents self.execution_queue = PriorityQueue() self.performance_tracker = PerformanceTracker() def optimize(self, target_system): # Parallel agent execution with coordinated optimization with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor: futures = { executor.submit(agent.optimize, target_system): agent for agent in self.agents } for future in concurrent.futures.as_completed(futures): agent = futures[future] result = future.result() self.performance_tracker.log(agent, result)
pythonclass CostOptimizer: def __init__(self): self.token_budget = 100000 # Monthly budget self.token_usage = 0 self.model_costs = { 'gpt-5': 0.03, 'claude-4-sonnet': 0.015, 'claude-4-haiku': 0.0025 } def select_optimal_model(self, complexity): # Dynamic model selection based on task complexity and budget pass
Target Optimization: $ARGUMENTS
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.