Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Guide agent-driven parameter optimization for configurable systems with measurable objectives. Use for HPO, inference tuning, simulations, or RL/control experiments.
.claude/skills/sickn33-optim-agent/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -6% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 82% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 5% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 8% | 0% |
Use this skill to optimize configurable systems against a measurable scalar objective. It helps an agent turn vague tuning requests into bounded experiments with a defined search space, budget, baseline, and evidence-backed recommendation.
Tune learning rate, regularization, and tree depth for a credit-default model. Track validation AUC for each trial, compare against the default configuration, and recommend the best setting only if it improves the baseline under the agreed trial budget.
Tune retrieval depth, temperature, and reranker threshold for a RAG workflow. Optimize answer quality under a latency or cost ceiling, then report the best configuration with quality, latency, and cost tradeoffs.
Tune controller gains or environment parameters for a simulator. Optimize reward or error while logging failed trials separately so unstable configurations do not bias the recommendation.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 15,448 | 13,383 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,206 | 3,732 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 14,916 | 8,873 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,676 | 2,519 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 13,806 | 8,668 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,736 | 2,273 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 29,302 | 7,841 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,182 | 2,147 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 9,544 | 6,553 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,871 | 1,942 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 11,937 | 6,921 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,183 | 2,088 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 13,817 | 8,866 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,358 | 2,379 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 11,554 | 7,078 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,795 | 1,886 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 10,182 | 5,704 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,825 | 1,613 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 9,928 | 6,433 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,604 | 1,797 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 12,579 | 9,769 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,153 | 2,316 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 23,842 | 8,411 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 985 | 2,182 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,612 | 8,518 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,195 | 2,264 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 15,136 | 9,260 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,658 | 2,363 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 9,959 | 7,843 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,799 | 2,140 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 11,503 | 7,378 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,028 | 2,039 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→fail | 29,768 | 10,388 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,710 | 2,600 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,064 | 9,010 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,768 | 2,202 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 9,732 | 6,646 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,755 | 1,833 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 8,905 | 5,843 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,468 | 1,695 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 9,058 | 4,798 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,465 | 1,582 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 11,422 | 7,700 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,040 | 2,038 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 8,984 | 2,970 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,789 | 1,161 | -35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | 12,889 | 6,839 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,271 | 1,838 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | fail→pass | 8,597 | 7,581 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,600 | 2,006 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted, and 23 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +28 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.