Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →AI and machine learning workflow covering LLM application development, RAG implementation, agent architecture, ML pipelines, and AI-powered features.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Comprehensive AI/ML workflow for building LLM applications, implementing RAG systems, creating AI agents, and developing machine learning pipelines. This bundle orchestrates skills for production AI development.
Use this workflow when:
ai-product - AI product developmentai-engineer - AI engineeringai-agents-architect - Agent architecturellm-app-patterns - LLM patternsUse @ai-product to design AI-powered featuresUse @ai-agents-architect to design multi-agent systemllm-application-dev-ai-assistant - AI assistant developmentllm-application-dev-langchain-agent - LangChain agentsllm-application-dev-prompt-optimize - Prompt engineeringgemini-api-dev - Gemini APIUse @llm-application-dev-ai-assistant to build conversational AIUse @llm-application-dev-langchain-agent to create LangChain agentsUse @llm-application-dev-prompt-optimize to optimize promptsrag-engineer - RAG engineeringrag-implementation - RAG implementationembedding-strategies - Embedding selectionvector-database-engineer - Vector databasessimilarity-search-patterns - Similarity searchhybrid-search-implementation - Hybrid searchUse @rag-engineer to design RAG pipelineUse @vector-database-engineer to set up vector searchUse @embedding-strategies to select optimal embeddingsautonomous-agents - Autonomous agent patternsautonomous-agent-patterns - Agent patternscrewai - CrewAI frameworklanggraph - LangGraphmulti-agent-patterns - Multi-agent systemscomputer-use-agents - Computer use agentsUse @crewai to build role-based multi-agent systemUse @langgraph to create stateful AI workflowsUse @autonomous-agents to design autonomous agentml-engineer - ML engineeringmlops-engineer - MLOpsmachine-learning-ops-ml-pipeline - ML pipelinesml-pipeline-workflow - ML workflowsdata-engineer - Data engineeringUse @ml-engineer to build machine learning pipelineUse @mlops-engineer to set up MLOps infrastructurelangfuse - Langfuse observabilitymanifest - Manifest telemetryevaluation - AI evaluationllm-evaluation - LLM evaluationUse @langfuse to set up LLM observabilityUse @evaluation to create evaluation frameworkprompt-engineering - Prompt securitysecurity-scanning-security-sast - Security scanningdevelopment - Application developmentdatabase - Data managementcloud-devops - Infrastructuretesting-qa - AI testing| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +68 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.