Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Cloud infrastructure and DevOps workflow covering AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, Terraform, CI/CD, monitoring, and cloud-native development.
.claude/skills/cloud-devops/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Comprehensive cloud and DevOps workflow for infrastructure provisioning, container orchestration, CI/CD pipelines, monitoring, and cloud-native application development.
Use this workflow when:
cloud-architect - Cloud architectureaws-skills - AWS developmentazure-functions - Azure developmentgcp-cloud-run - GCP developmentterraform-skill - Terraform IaCterraform-specialist - Advanced TerraformUse @cloud-architect to design multi-cloud architectureUse @terraform-skill to provision AWS infrastructurekubernetes-architect - Kubernetes architecturedocker-expert - Docker containerizationhelm-chart-scaffolding - Helm chartsk8s-manifest-generator - K8s manifestsk8s-security-policies - K8s securityUse @kubernetes-architect to design K8s architectureUse @docker-expert to containerize applicationUse @helm-chart-scaffolding to create Helm chartdeployment-engineer - Deployment engineeringcicd-automation-workflow-automate - CI/CD automationgithub-actions-templates - GitHub Actionsgitlab-ci-patterns - GitLab CIdeployment-pipeline-design - Pipeline designUse @cicd-automation-workflow-automate to set up CI/CD pipelineUse @github-actions-templates to create GitHub Actions workflowobservability-engineer - Observability engineeringgrafana-dashboards - Grafana dashboardsprometheus-configuration - Prometheus setupdatadog-automation - Datadog integrationsentry-automation - Sentry error trackingUse @observability-engineer to set up observability stackUse @grafana-dashboards to create monitoring dashboardscloud-penetration-testing - Cloud pentestingaws-penetration-testing - AWS securityk8s-security-policies - K8s securitysecrets-management - Secrets managementmtls-configuration - mTLS setupUse @cloud-penetration-testing to assess cloud securityUse @secrets-management to configure secretscost-optimization - Cloud cost optimizationdatabase-cloud-optimization-cost-optimize - Database cost optimizationUse @cost-optimization to reduce cloud costsincident-responder - Incident responseincident-runbook-templates - Runbook creationpostmortem-writing - Postmortem documentationUse @incident-runbook-templates to create runbooksSkills: aws-skills, aws-serverless, aws-penetration-testing
Services: EC2, Lambda, S3, RDS, ECS, EKSSkills: azure-functions, azure-ai-projects-py, azure-monitor-opentelemetry-py
Services: Functions, App Service, AKS, Cosmos DBSkills: gcp-cloud-run
Services: Cloud Run, GKE, Cloud Functions, BigQuerydevelopment - Application developmentsecurity-audit - Security testingdatabase - Database operationstesting-qa - Testing workflows| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +68 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.