Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Coach the user through actually selling: finding the champion and the buyer, running the first sales conversations, demoing their use case, handling "let me think about it," and closing the first paying customers yourself. Use when developers love it but nobody pays, you've never sold anything and freeze on the conversation, or deals keep stalling on "we'll think about it."
.claude/skills/aidevgtm-founder-led-sales/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 34% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 47% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 67% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 40% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
> Nobody can sell it before you can. The first ten deals are not a hire, they are how you learn what you are actually selling and to whom. Do them yourself, badly at first, until the motion repeats.
Use this when: developers love it and live in the free tier but nobody pays, you have never sold anything and freeze on the actual conversation, every deal dies on "let me think about it," or you are tempted to hire a salesperson to do the part you have not figured out yet.
market-to-devs-sell-to-buyers told you who to sell to (the dev adopts, the boss pays). pricing set the number. This is the part nobody warns technical founders about: actually doing it. And it is not slimy. Selling a dev tool well is discovery plus helping a champion get budget. You are not convincing anyone of anything false, you are finding the people who already have the pain and making it easy for them to say yes.
One rule under all of it: do this yourself until it repeats. You cannot outsource a motion you have not cracked. Founders who hire a rep at deal one hire someone to fail at a job that does not exist yet.
If any one is missing, it is not a deal, it is a conversation. Your job is to find out which is missing.
1. Start with who is already engaged. Do not cold-blast strangers. Your first customers are hiding in your own usage data: the team with three seats on the free tier, the person who filed four issues, the account that hit a limit. They have already shown you the pain.
2. Reach out like a founder, not a sequence. One short, human message to a real person about a specific thing you noticed. If it could have gone to a thousand people, do not send it.
3. The first call is discovery, not a pitch. Talk 30 percent, listen 70. Learn: what are they using it for, what did they do before, what is the pain costing them, who else feels it, who owns the budget. Founders pitch too early and too much. The person asking the best questions controls the conversation.
4. Demo their use case, not your feature list. Show the product doing their job with their kind of data, and get them to the win (see time-to-first-value). A feature tour is not a demo. "Here is your exact problem, solved" is.
5. Frame value for the buyer, not the dev. The developer feels the hours saved (Chronos). The buyer approves budget for the outcome: a release cycle back, an incident avoided, a compliance box checked, a competitor not winning (Kairos). Translate the dev's love into a business result the boss can defend.
6. Arm the champion to sell internally. You are rarely in the room when the yes happens. Give your champion the one-paragraph business case, the number, and the answer to "why now," so they can walk it to their boss. This is the middle-out motion: an excited dev plus a buyer who sees the ROI.
7. Always leave with a specific next step and a date. This is how you kill the stall before it starts.
It is a missing next step, or a concern you did not surface. Do not accept it and leave. Ask, gently: "Totally fair. What would you need to be sure of to move forward?" Then you learn the real blocker (budget, a stakeholder, a missing feature, timing) and can actually address it. A vague yes-later is a no you have not diagnosed.
pricing).Built from real dev-tool GTM experience, with frameworks from Adam Frankl (The Developer-Facing Startup) and Jakub Czakon (markepear.dev). When a framework can't make the call, that's what a human is for: The DevTool GTM Company.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 19,183 | 15,022 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,736 | 3,661 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 19,326 | 15,964 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,777 | 4,082 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 11,252 | 8,470 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,652 | 2,695 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 15,231 | 14,738 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,083 | 3,671 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 14,783 | 7,016 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,080 | 2,498 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 14,390 | 14,346 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,064 | 3,680 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 18,829 | 18,801 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,646 | 3,722 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 18,756 | 20,098 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,632 | 4,425 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 8,311 | 6,967 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,305 | 2,505 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 15,832 | 10,053 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,154 | 2,943 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 18,152 | 19,858 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,641 | 4,178 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 17,169 | 12,741 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,614 | 3,250 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 18,527 | 16,720 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,447 | 3,799 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 15,281 | 14,512 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,262 | 3,544 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 14,989 | 17,681 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,246 | 3,836 | +71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 16,675 | 13,533 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,522 | 3,490 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 17,349 | 15,854 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,216 | 3,706 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,161 | 11,436 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,257 | 3,230 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 19,707 | 18,551 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,815 | 3,944 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 16,090 | 12,022 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,200 | 3,074 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 25,412 | 26,119 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,033 | 5,251 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 63,437 | 28,165 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,214 | 6,043 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 25,322 | 20,249 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,516 | 4,349 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +26 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.