Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
.claude/skills/alirezarezvani-ma-playbook/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 40% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -24% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -44% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 55% | 0% |
Frameworks for both sides of M&A: acquiring companies and being acquired.
M&A, mergers and acquisitions, due diligence, acquisition, acqui-hire, integration, deal structure, valuation, LOI, term sheet, earnout
Acquiring: Start with strategic rationale → target screening → due diligence → valuation → negotiation → integration.
Being Acquired: Start with readiness assessment → data room prep → advisor selection → negotiation → transition.
| Domain | Key Questions | Red Flags | |--------|--------------|-----------| | Financial | Revenue quality, customer concentration, burn rate | >30% revenue from 1 customer | | Technical | Code quality, tech debt, architecture fit | Monolith with no tests | | Legal | IP ownership, pending litigation, contracts | Key IP owned by individuals | | People | Key person risk, culture fit, retention risk | Founders have no lockup/earnout | | Market | Market position, competitive threats | Declining market share | | Customers | Churn rate, NPS, contract terms | High churn, short contracts |
The ranges below are illustrative, not current market data — always verify against current market comps before using them in a model or negotiation.
Sources to verify against (check the latest edition): the SaaS Capital Index (private SaaS revenue multiples, updated monthly), Software Equity Group (SEG) Annual/Quarterly SaaS M&A Reports (transaction multiples), and Aventis Advisors' SaaS valuation multiples reports. Cross-check at least two before anchoring a price.
See references/integration-playbook.md for the 100-day integration plan.
| Term | What to Watch | Your Leverage | |------|--------------|---------------| | Valuation | Earnout traps (unreachable targets) | Multiple competing offers | | Earnout | Milestone definitions, measurement period | Cash-heavy vs earnout-heavy split | | Lockup | Duration, conditions | Your replaceability | | Rep & warranties | Scope of liability | Escrow vs indemnification cap | | Employee retention | Who gets offers, at what terms | Key person dependencies |
This skill frames the deal; two sibling skills verify it. Hand off — don't duplicate:
general-counsel-advisor: run the LOI/term sheet through ../general-counsel-advisor/scripts/term_sheet_analyzer.py (12-dimension 0-100 score) and the definitive docs through ../general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py (12 founder-killer patterns: earnout traps, uncapped indemnity, vague IP, etc.). Any 🔴 finding goes to outside counsel before signing.chief-data-officer-advisor: run ../chief-data-officer-advisor/scripts/ai_training_data_audit.py (training-data rights, GDPR Art. 6 basis) and ../chief-data-officer-advisor/scripts/data_asset_valuator.py (data-asset value, M&A multiplier with carve-out penalties) on the target's data estate. Undocumented consent provenance is a price-reduction or walk-away item.cfo-advisor tools for the quantitative model; this playbook stays qualitative.Loop the findings back into the negotiation-points table above before the next counter.
| Role | Contribution to M&A | |------|-------------------| | CEO | Strategic rationale, negotiation lead | | CFO | Valuation, deal structure, financing | | GC | LOI/term sheet review, contract risk scan, regulatory triggers | | CDO | Data diligence: training-data rights, data-asset valuation | | CTO | Technical due diligence, integration architecture | | CHRO | People due diligence, retention planning | | COO | Integration execution, process merge | | CPO | Product roadmap impact, customer overlap |
references/integration-playbook.md — 100-day post-acquisition integration planreferences/due-diligence-checklist.md — comprehensive DD checklist by domain../general-counsel-advisor/SKILL.md — term sheet analyzer + contract risk scanner../chief-data-officer-advisor/SKILL.md — data diligence + data-asset valuation| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 22,642 | 18,460 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,115 | 4,513 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 18,765 | 16,864 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,227 | 4,502 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 19,380 | 20,237 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,168 | 5,367 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,255 | 14,567 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,557 | 4,041 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 14,493 | 16,300 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,848 | 4,645 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 11,783 | 8,786 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,980 | 2,893 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 13,203 | 8,792 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,352 | 2,797 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 12,340 | 8,744 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,017 | 2,813 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 12,206 | 13,569 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,200 | 3,594 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,217 | 11,280 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,928 | 3,459 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,750 | 11,141 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,479 | 3,349 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 12,927 | 8,021 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,336 | 2,690 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 16,483 | 3,949 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,952 | 2,258 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 20,432 | 4,767 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,032 | 2,261 | -44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 15,624 | 13,021 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,773 | 3,478 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 12,664 | 12,648 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,252 | 3,609 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 12,212 | 6,995 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,130 | 2,524 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 8,579 | 5,116 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,456 | 2,256 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,321 | 11,475 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,231 | 3,257 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 10,225 | 11,811 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,732 | 3,370 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 11,430 | 8,667 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,048 | 2,785 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 10,152 | 6,592 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,694 | 2,412 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 7,809 | 1,202 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,333 | 1,548 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 7,764 | 2,821 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,333 | 1,820 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 12,406 | 7,925 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,027 | 2,746 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +24 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.