Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Resume a paused experiment. Checkout the experiment branch, read results history, continue iterating. Use when the user runs /ar:resume or asks to pick up a previously started autoresearch experiment.
.claude/skills/alirezarezvani-resume/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -56% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 21% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -32% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -18% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -38% | 0% |
Resume a paused or context-limited experiment. Reads all history and continues where you left off.
/ar:resume # List experiments, let user pick
/ar:resume engineering/api-speed # Resume specific experimentIf no experiment specified:
bashpython {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list
Show status for each (active/paused/done based on results.tsv age). Let user pick.
bash# Checkout the experiment branch git checkout autoresearch/{domain}/{name} # Read config cat .autoresearch/{domain}/{name}/config.cfg # Read strategy cat .autoresearch/{domain}/{name}/program.md # Read full results history cat .autoresearch/{domain}/{name}/results.tsv # Read recent git log for the branch git log --oneline -20
Summarize for the user:
Resuming: engineering/api-speed
Target: src/api/search.py
Metric: p50_ms (lower is better)
Experiments: 23 total — 8 kept, 12 discarded, 3 crashed
Best: 185ms (-42% from baseline of 320ms)
Last experiment: "added response caching" → KEEP (185ms)
Recent patterns:
- Caching changes: 3 kept, 1 discarded (consistently helpful)
- Algorithm changes: 2 discarded, 1 crashed (high risk, low reward so far)
- I/O optimization: 2 kept (promising direction)How would you like to continue?
1. Single iteration (/ar:run) — I'll make one change and evaluate
2. Start a loop (/ar:loop) — Autonomous with scheduled interval
3. Just show me the results — I'll review and decideIf the user picks loop, hand off to /ar:loop with the experiment pre-selected. If single, hand off to /ar:run.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 6,395 | 5,265 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,015 | 772 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 9,878 | 1,799 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,678 | 741 | -56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 10,931 | 4,808 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,722 | 801 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 11,551 | 3,573 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,062 | 650 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 6,522 | 4,521 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,031 | 726 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 10,026 | 4,667 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,689 | 696 | -59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 4,921 | 3,010 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 782 | 784 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 7,165 | 4,851 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,272 | 732 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 4,271 | 2,189 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 828 | 925 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 7,733 | 6,517 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,191 | 1,059 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 7,149 | 7,196 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,163 | 827 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 13,381 | 11,052 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,180 | 2,646 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 10,493 | 5,001 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,753 | 1,414 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 8,513 | 2,748 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,470 | 999 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 5,553 | 2,130 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,104 | 904 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 12,902 | 5,310 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,264 | 1,543 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 6,985 | 1,375 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,251 | 772 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 6,135 | 1,839 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,213 | 797 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 11,220 | 1,944 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,050 | 919 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 13,673 | 3,202 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,815 | 1,018 | -64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 1,879 | 3,943 | +110% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 329 | 720 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,208 | 2,518 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,558 | 955 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 15 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 15 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.